Description
i need a simple definition of cultural linguistic around 3 lines
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
Anonymous
Great! Studypool always delivers quality work.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
2 pages
Printmaking
Printmaking is the process by which a work of art can be created over and over again, from a single picture that is usuall ...
Printmaking
Printmaking is the process by which a work of art can be created over and over again, from a single picture that is usually prepared from a plate of wood, metal, paper or fabric. There is a wide variety of techniques that can be used in printmaking, and this art is one of the oldest forms of art in the world.
EN 106 Park University Unit 3 Models for Formulating a Working Thesis Discussion
Welcome to the unit discussion area for EN106. This area will fill up quickly with lively interchanges among you, your col ...
EN 106 Park University Unit 3 Models for Formulating a Working Thesis Discussion
Welcome to the unit discussion area for EN106. This area will fill up quickly with lively interchanges among you, your colleagues and your instructor. Check back often!Important! Most units, you are required to post your own responses before you can see your classmates' responses. The reason for this is that your instructor and classmates are interested in your thoughts on the subject! Remember, most of the topics in discussion have to do with your analysis and interpretation, not an objective right/wrong answer. Your unit discussion responses are graded not only for accuracy but also for creativity and insight. See the Grading and Assessment page for more details.Due Dates: Your initial (first) post is due no later than Thursday Noon Central Standard Time (CST), with the expectation that you will return between Thursday and Sunday to converse with your peers.Assessment: See the Grading and Assessment content item under Course Information.For all references, use an appropriate form of documentation (MLA, APA, or another standard academic style discussed in Easy Writer.)Discussion TopicWe will use this discussion to generate and respond to working thesis statements for Essay #2.Greene and Lidinsky present four helpful models for formulating a working thesis:The Misinterpretations model: "Although many have argued X, a careful examination suggests Z."The Gap model: "Although others have noted X, they have overlooked the importance of Y."The Modification model: "Although I agree with the X and Y ideas of other writers, it is important to extend/refine/limit their ideas in this way..."The Hypothesis-testing model: "While some writers explain X by suggesting Y, a close analysis of the problem reveals several competing explanations…"These thesis models are certainly not the only options available to you, but they do offer ways to enter an academic conversation and make a contribution that extends beyond merely summarizing or echoing someone else's ideas.In your initial post, do the following:Use two of the thesis models above to craft two potential working thesis statements you could use in this unit's essayWrite a paragraph or so defining the audience you plan to write your essay to. Explain who this audience is, why you have chosen this audience, and what techniques you plan to use in your essay to connect with this audience.In your follow-up posts, respond to at least two classmate's posts by doing both of the following:Explain the types of supporting evidence you would expect to see for each working thesis statement. Suggest at least one way your classmate could appeal to their chosen audience for Essay #2.A NOTE ABOUT ACADEMIC HONESTY: This unit, we will brainstorm, draft, and respond to potential thesis statements for your essays. Please do not assume that other students' thesis statements are "up for grabs." There are a many possibilities for thesis statements and while you may glean tips and strategies for yours from this unit's interaction, you should be careful not to claim another student's thesis wording as your own.
Bolsanaro Brazil An Environmental Perspective Discussion
Select one of the prompts listed below and construct a thoughtful, well-reasoned analysis of the issue.
1. What is the val ...
Bolsanaro Brazil An Environmental Perspective Discussion
Select one of the prompts listed below and construct a thoughtful, well-reasoned analysis of the issue.
1. What is the value of philosophy?
In the United States of America many philosophy programs (and humanities programs more broadly) have seen their funding cut because it is not perceived to provide any concrete value. Drawing on specific points from the course readings, construct an argument defending the value of philosophy. (If you choose this option, please be sure to be specific – that means avoiding platitudes such as, “philosophy makes people critical thinkers,” without offering specific ways in which that happens).
2. Evaluate an argument from the media (speech, article, op-ed, documentary)
Choose a speech or article on a sociopolitical topic, and then analyze and evaluate the argument being made according to the principles outlined in your Critical Thinking module. This means doing the following:
Find an argument in media
Summarize the argument being made – what is their thesis (the point they’re making)?
State and explain the reasons provided in defense of the position
Identify any fallacies being committed
Give you overall assessment of the position
(For #2, there is no requirement regarding the topic being discussed; the only requirement is that the source (article, speech, campaign commercial, etc.) is making an argument, which therefore allows you to analyze and evaluate that argument)
3. What are the Forms and how does Aristotle critique the theory of the Forms?
Plato famously set forth his theory of the Forms when attempting to explain the nature of both reality and knowledge. Integrating evidence from the course content, provide a detailed account of what the Forms are, what purpose they serve, and why Plato placed such a high value on them. Then, provide a detailed account of how and why Aristotle critiqued the theory of the Forms.
4. Is there sufficient evidence to prove God’s existence?
Since the inception of philosophy, philosophers have spent a considerable amount of time thinking about God/the Gods, and whether we can know anything about It/Them. During the middle ages, this occupied a central place in the philosophical tradition, as philosophers explored the question of whether there is sufficient evidence to prove the existence of God. To explore this question, some thinkers constructed deductive arguments, others attempted inductive arguments; in response, others adopted a more skeptical outlook, claiming belief requires a “leap of faith;” and, of course, others challenged the existence of God by referring to what they thought to be various contradictions of creation, such as the problem of evil. Referring to the content covered in your learning module, construct an argument in response to the question: Is there sufficient evidence to prove God’s existence?
5. Who offers a more accurate theory regarding how human knowledge is acquired, the rationalists or the empiricists?
In your learning module on Rationalism and Empiricism, you were given the chance to explore one of the most contentious philosophical debates of the Renaissance and the Enlightenment periods in the Western tradition. Recognizing that neither theory is conclusive regarding the question of how we acquire knowledge, construct an argument in favor of either rationalism or empiricism. To do this you’ll have to state and explain the main reasons provided in defense of each theory, incorporating some of the key thinkers and ideas into your paper. Additionally, you will have to construct an argument defending which of the two theories provides better reasons.
6. How does Kant attempt to resolve the rationalist-empiricist debate?
Upon reading David Hume, Immanuel Kant famously declared, “Hume awoke me from my dogmatic slumber,” and from that point on he set out to address the problems posed by Hume’s skepticism. Specifically, Kant sought to resolve the rationalist-empiricist debate by combining certain elements of each. Incorporating evidence from the readings, explain in your own words how Kant attempts to resolve this debate through the concept of “synthetic a priori faculties.”
Saint Leo University Ethics of Care Personal Relations & Moral Thinking Discussion
In this week's module we saw that the ethics of care views human life in terms of cycles of attachment. Overlapping relati ...
Saint Leo University Ethics of Care Personal Relations & Moral Thinking Discussion
In this week's module we saw that the ethics of care views human life in terms of cycles of attachment. Overlapping relations and cycles of relations make up who we are as individuals. We do not get a sense of who we are by detaching ourselves from our relations with others. This contrasts with the conception of defining the self in separation from and even opposition to others. Do you agree with the idea that we are who we are in terms of our relations, and that we are neither independent nor separate?In the AVP for this week we also saw that Gilligan rejects Kohlberg's assumption of a hierarchical ordering that places abstract thinking above thinking in terms of narratives involving human relations when trying to gauge the moral development of individuals. Do you see her critique as a strong one? And if so, what might the success of her critique suggest about employing similar feminist approaches to other areas of the Western philosophical tradition beyond just ethics—such as metaphysics or epistemology? These disciplines too, have tacitly assumed—at least since the Enlightenment—that genuine insight into the nature of reality and the structure of truth is to be arrived at via a penchant for abstract thinking, universalizable principles, and a strict adherence to rationality. For instance, how might a feminist, or what other philosopher's have called a “Communitarian”, approach to the metaphysical question concerning the nature of the individual, or self—and what it means to be one—contrast with what Hobbes or Kant took the self to be?Ethical Choices, 2nd edition:Introduction, pp. 249-250The Care Perspective, pp. 253-256Foundations of and Ethics of Care, pp. 257-260Care and Virtue, pp. 261-262
SOC 350 California National University Microagression Analytic Memo
Hi all the instructions are attached! I need a paper written on this specific topic
SOC 350 California National University Microagression Analytic Memo
Hi all the instructions are attached! I need a paper written on this specific topic
project topic is casual sex
Conduct some research on your project topic through the Online Library. Find at least 4 articles that discuss your topic a ...
project topic is casual sex
Conduct some research on your project topic through the Online Library. Find at least 4 articles that discuss your topic and create a reference page. Use the Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality as a possible source. Be sure to cite your resources in APA format.
Similar Content
what is the outcome?
Assignment 2: RA 2: Case ScenarioBackground:The defendant is a forty-year-old, single, black female charged with a first-d...
UoG Ability to Make Laws Political Science Question
...
Journal as diaries
Here is what has been said about the assignment in the syllabus :"Journals is personal documentation of AD - 227 related i...
Roles Differences Between Intelligence Sources & Gatherers Comparative Essay
What are the differences in perspectives and roles between intelligence analysts and military commanders? What are the sim...
University of Maryland Eastern Psychology Research Study Questions Research
Please read the following psychological research study methodology, Then answer the following questionReading: Exercise Re...
Grantham University The Nature of Arguments Paper
Need help with writing assignment, must be in first person 500- 700 words, need back by Tuesday noon, ...
Gene Doping.edited
Drug taking is nothing new in sports. In the past athletes has been known to use a lot of methods to enhance their perform...
20201201044749guitar Concert Assignment 1 1
World Music Optional Concert for Concert Report – Guitar and World Music Traditions by Watch the YouTube concert and ans...
Literature Review
The relationship between depression and social development of adolescents (14-17 Does CBT improve social development in ad...
Related Tags
Book Guides
The Scarlet Letter
by Nathaniel Hawthorne
The Great Gatsby
by Francis Scott Key Fitzgerald
The Prince
by Niccolò Machiavelli
East of Eden
by John Steinback
One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest
by Ken Kesey
The Calcutta Chromosome
by Amitav Ghosh
Death Of A Salesmen
by Arthur Miller
Invisible Man
by Ralph Ellison
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
2 pages
Printmaking
Printmaking is the process by which a work of art can be created over and over again, from a single picture that is usuall ...
Printmaking
Printmaking is the process by which a work of art can be created over and over again, from a single picture that is usually prepared from a plate of wood, metal, paper or fabric. There is a wide variety of techniques that can be used in printmaking, and this art is one of the oldest forms of art in the world.
EN 106 Park University Unit 3 Models for Formulating a Working Thesis Discussion
Welcome to the unit discussion area for EN106. This area will fill up quickly with lively interchanges among you, your col ...
EN 106 Park University Unit 3 Models for Formulating a Working Thesis Discussion
Welcome to the unit discussion area for EN106. This area will fill up quickly with lively interchanges among you, your colleagues and your instructor. Check back often!Important! Most units, you are required to post your own responses before you can see your classmates' responses. The reason for this is that your instructor and classmates are interested in your thoughts on the subject! Remember, most of the topics in discussion have to do with your analysis and interpretation, not an objective right/wrong answer. Your unit discussion responses are graded not only for accuracy but also for creativity and insight. See the Grading and Assessment page for more details.Due Dates: Your initial (first) post is due no later than Thursday Noon Central Standard Time (CST), with the expectation that you will return between Thursday and Sunday to converse with your peers.Assessment: See the Grading and Assessment content item under Course Information.For all references, use an appropriate form of documentation (MLA, APA, or another standard academic style discussed in Easy Writer.)Discussion TopicWe will use this discussion to generate and respond to working thesis statements for Essay #2.Greene and Lidinsky present four helpful models for formulating a working thesis:The Misinterpretations model: "Although many have argued X, a careful examination suggests Z."The Gap model: "Although others have noted X, they have overlooked the importance of Y."The Modification model: "Although I agree with the X and Y ideas of other writers, it is important to extend/refine/limit their ideas in this way..."The Hypothesis-testing model: "While some writers explain X by suggesting Y, a close analysis of the problem reveals several competing explanations…"These thesis models are certainly not the only options available to you, but they do offer ways to enter an academic conversation and make a contribution that extends beyond merely summarizing or echoing someone else's ideas.In your initial post, do the following:Use two of the thesis models above to craft two potential working thesis statements you could use in this unit's essayWrite a paragraph or so defining the audience you plan to write your essay to. Explain who this audience is, why you have chosen this audience, and what techniques you plan to use in your essay to connect with this audience.In your follow-up posts, respond to at least two classmate's posts by doing both of the following:Explain the types of supporting evidence you would expect to see for each working thesis statement. Suggest at least one way your classmate could appeal to their chosen audience for Essay #2.A NOTE ABOUT ACADEMIC HONESTY: This unit, we will brainstorm, draft, and respond to potential thesis statements for your essays. Please do not assume that other students' thesis statements are "up for grabs." There are a many possibilities for thesis statements and while you may glean tips and strategies for yours from this unit's interaction, you should be careful not to claim another student's thesis wording as your own.
Bolsanaro Brazil An Environmental Perspective Discussion
Select one of the prompts listed below and construct a thoughtful, well-reasoned analysis of the issue.
1. What is the val ...
Bolsanaro Brazil An Environmental Perspective Discussion
Select one of the prompts listed below and construct a thoughtful, well-reasoned analysis of the issue.
1. What is the value of philosophy?
In the United States of America many philosophy programs (and humanities programs more broadly) have seen their funding cut because it is not perceived to provide any concrete value. Drawing on specific points from the course readings, construct an argument defending the value of philosophy. (If you choose this option, please be sure to be specific – that means avoiding platitudes such as, “philosophy makes people critical thinkers,” without offering specific ways in which that happens).
2. Evaluate an argument from the media (speech, article, op-ed, documentary)
Choose a speech or article on a sociopolitical topic, and then analyze and evaluate the argument being made according to the principles outlined in your Critical Thinking module. This means doing the following:
Find an argument in media
Summarize the argument being made – what is their thesis (the point they’re making)?
State and explain the reasons provided in defense of the position
Identify any fallacies being committed
Give you overall assessment of the position
(For #2, there is no requirement regarding the topic being discussed; the only requirement is that the source (article, speech, campaign commercial, etc.) is making an argument, which therefore allows you to analyze and evaluate that argument)
3. What are the Forms and how does Aristotle critique the theory of the Forms?
Plato famously set forth his theory of the Forms when attempting to explain the nature of both reality and knowledge. Integrating evidence from the course content, provide a detailed account of what the Forms are, what purpose they serve, and why Plato placed such a high value on them. Then, provide a detailed account of how and why Aristotle critiqued the theory of the Forms.
4. Is there sufficient evidence to prove God’s existence?
Since the inception of philosophy, philosophers have spent a considerable amount of time thinking about God/the Gods, and whether we can know anything about It/Them. During the middle ages, this occupied a central place in the philosophical tradition, as philosophers explored the question of whether there is sufficient evidence to prove the existence of God. To explore this question, some thinkers constructed deductive arguments, others attempted inductive arguments; in response, others adopted a more skeptical outlook, claiming belief requires a “leap of faith;” and, of course, others challenged the existence of God by referring to what they thought to be various contradictions of creation, such as the problem of evil. Referring to the content covered in your learning module, construct an argument in response to the question: Is there sufficient evidence to prove God’s existence?
5. Who offers a more accurate theory regarding how human knowledge is acquired, the rationalists or the empiricists?
In your learning module on Rationalism and Empiricism, you were given the chance to explore one of the most contentious philosophical debates of the Renaissance and the Enlightenment periods in the Western tradition. Recognizing that neither theory is conclusive regarding the question of how we acquire knowledge, construct an argument in favor of either rationalism or empiricism. To do this you’ll have to state and explain the main reasons provided in defense of each theory, incorporating some of the key thinkers and ideas into your paper. Additionally, you will have to construct an argument defending which of the two theories provides better reasons.
6. How does Kant attempt to resolve the rationalist-empiricist debate?
Upon reading David Hume, Immanuel Kant famously declared, “Hume awoke me from my dogmatic slumber,” and from that point on he set out to address the problems posed by Hume’s skepticism. Specifically, Kant sought to resolve the rationalist-empiricist debate by combining certain elements of each. Incorporating evidence from the readings, explain in your own words how Kant attempts to resolve this debate through the concept of “synthetic a priori faculties.”
Saint Leo University Ethics of Care Personal Relations & Moral Thinking Discussion
In this week's module we saw that the ethics of care views human life in terms of cycles of attachment. Overlapping relati ...
Saint Leo University Ethics of Care Personal Relations & Moral Thinking Discussion
In this week's module we saw that the ethics of care views human life in terms of cycles of attachment. Overlapping relations and cycles of relations make up who we are as individuals. We do not get a sense of who we are by detaching ourselves from our relations with others. This contrasts with the conception of defining the self in separation from and even opposition to others. Do you agree with the idea that we are who we are in terms of our relations, and that we are neither independent nor separate?In the AVP for this week we also saw that Gilligan rejects Kohlberg's assumption of a hierarchical ordering that places abstract thinking above thinking in terms of narratives involving human relations when trying to gauge the moral development of individuals. Do you see her critique as a strong one? And if so, what might the success of her critique suggest about employing similar feminist approaches to other areas of the Western philosophical tradition beyond just ethics—such as metaphysics or epistemology? These disciplines too, have tacitly assumed—at least since the Enlightenment—that genuine insight into the nature of reality and the structure of truth is to be arrived at via a penchant for abstract thinking, universalizable principles, and a strict adherence to rationality. For instance, how might a feminist, or what other philosopher's have called a “Communitarian”, approach to the metaphysical question concerning the nature of the individual, or self—and what it means to be one—contrast with what Hobbes or Kant took the self to be?Ethical Choices, 2nd edition:Introduction, pp. 249-250The Care Perspective, pp. 253-256Foundations of and Ethics of Care, pp. 257-260Care and Virtue, pp. 261-262
SOC 350 California National University Microagression Analytic Memo
Hi all the instructions are attached! I need a paper written on this specific topic
SOC 350 California National University Microagression Analytic Memo
Hi all the instructions are attached! I need a paper written on this specific topic
project topic is casual sex
Conduct some research on your project topic through the Online Library. Find at least 4 articles that discuss your topic a ...
project topic is casual sex
Conduct some research on your project topic through the Online Library. Find at least 4 articles that discuss your topic and create a reference page. Use the Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality as a possible source. Be sure to cite your resources in APA format.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents