Description
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Thank you for the opportunity to help you with your question!
A.level of support the interface needs to provide
Please let me know if you need any clarification. I'm always happy to answer your questions.Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Great! 10/10 would recommend using Studypool to help you study.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Ashford University Virtuous Action and Moral Standards Essay
Assignment Three: Individual-Developed Essay Due : Open Assignment The third essay is to be designed by the individual st ...
Ashford University Virtuous Action and Moral Standards Essay
Assignment Three: Individual-Developed Essay Due : Open Assignment The third essay is to be designed by the individual student. The only stipulation is that it be based in the philosophy of ethics and ethical theory. A research paper is not required; a personal essay is acceptable for this assignment. In the event that you'd rather not develop your own question, I have included several prompts below:Potential PapersBelow are a couple prompts you might use if your imagination otherwise fails you.Remember: you can design your own prompts and write your papers on any relevant topic within the very large realm of the Philosophy of Ethics. (1) In the Nicomachean Ethics – in Book I, Chapter 4 (1105a30-35 and 1105b7-10) and Book I, Chapter 3 (1104b5-10) – Aristotle identifies four conditions that an action must satisfy to count as virtuous. (Roughly, the act must be done knowingly, as the result of the actor having decided on the act because it was virtuous, from a firm and unchanging state, and with enjoyment.) Drawing on the writings of one or more of the following, critique or defend one of these conditions as a necessary condition for an action being virtuous: Julia Annas, John Doris, John Stuart Mill, Immanuel Kant (or any other author you prefer).A successful answer to question (1) might look something like this. (You do not need to follow this outline as long as you answer the stated question.)Offer a short statement in your own words of the condition that you will be defending or criticizing as necessary for an action to be virtuous, followed by the claim that you will be making about it (e.g. “In this paper, drawing on the work of X, I will argue that Y is (not) a necessary condition for an action to be virtuous.”)Provide a paragraph explaining Aristotle’s reasons for identifying the condition as necessary. (Don’t just quote here: make it clear that you understand how Aristotle’s position here fits into his more general views about the nature of virtue.)Offer a defense or criticism of this condition, drawing on one or more of the authors listed above, followed by your own assessment of this defense or criticism.Offer one or perhaps two (critical or supportive) response (s) to this defense or criticism, either one(s) that you yourself devise, or one (s) that draw(s) on one or more of the readings we have done. These may be theoretical responses, or they might be examples or counterexamples that you describe or construct whose connection to the argument you make clear and explicit.Evaluate this response.Present a retort on behalf of Aristotle (or his imagined critic) to the response(s) thatyou have presented.Evaluate this retort.Evaluate the dialectic (though it’s fine if your paper ends in aporia...) (2) Using two or more of the authors we've discussed over the eight weeks, identify one of the roles that principles might play in the explanation or justification of moral action, and criticize or defend the claim that principles play that role. So, for example, you might discuss Daniel Batson’s suggestion that principles serve primarily as devices of rationalization in light of writings by Robert Nozick, or John Stuart Mill, or Immanuel Kant, or Judith Thomson (or vice versa, for one of the claims of one of those authors.) Or you might consider one or more of the principles that Judy Thomson extracts from her discussion of trolley cases in light of the writings of Cass Sunstein, or Fiery Cushman, or Josh Greene. (If you would like to draw on the work of a different author instead, check with your TF first to make sure that your proposal will work.) A successful answer to question (2) might look something like this. (You do not need to follow this outline as long as you answer the stated question.)Articulate the view about the role of principles in explaining or justifying moral action that you plan to defend or criticize, and briefly articulate the grounds on which you intend to defend or criticize this view.Explain your position more precisely, and offer one or more arguments on its behalf: either one(s) that you yourself devise, or one (s) that draw(s) on one or more of the readings we have done. These may be theoretical arguments, or they might be examples or counterexamples that you describe or construct whose connection to the dialectic you make clear and explicit.Response to these arguments (again, perhaps drawing on the work of one or more of our authors.)Evaluate this response, and offer a retort to it.Evaluate this retort.Evaluate the dialectic (though it’s fine if your paper ends in aporia...)(3) Drawing on at least two of the authors that we have read this semester, present and defend a view about the morally correct action in one of the following cases: Bernard Williams’ Jim case, Bernard Williams’ George case, or Judy Thomson’s fat man case. Identify and explain at least one implication of this view for one or more of the moral theories we have discussed.A successful answer to question (3) might look something like this. (You do not need to follow this outline as long as you answer the stated question.)An articulation of the view that you intend to defend. E.g. “In this paper, I will argue that in the X case, the right thing to do is Y. I will show that this means that moral theory M is incorrect (alternatively: that moral theory N is importantly correct) because it assumes that in X-like cases the correct thing to do is [blah].”Offer reasons for your view.Explain why someone might hold the opposite view about the case you areconsidering, and identify the reasoning that lies behind this alternative picture.Identify what you take to be a flaw in that reasoning, and explain why you think youralternative account avoids that flaw.Evaluate this response, and offer a retort to it.Evaluate this retort.Explain the implications of your discussion for one or more of the moral theories wehave discussed.Evaluate the dialectic (though it’s fine if your paper ends in aporia...)
United States History Essay
Essay: Provide a 1-3 page response (written) to the following question.There are a total of ten (10) possible points for t ...
United States History Essay
Essay: Provide a 1-3 page response (written) to the following question.There are a total of ten (10) possible points for this section.We began our class talking about “America the exception.”In other words, America was an exception to the great civilizations of the past (ancient China, Rome, Egypt, etc.) in that American society was not ruled by a monarch or religious official but by the people.The years between the establishment of the Constitution and the Civil War posed a significant challenge to the concept of the “people’s rule” in America.Construct an argumentative essay that discusses the challenges that the expansion of the federal government, the Industrial Revolution, and, most importantly, chattel slavery posed to American freedom and democracy.Why were these issues so challenging and what did America do to “restore” power to the people?
SOC 350 CNUAS Analytic Memo Research Paper
I am too lazy to do this and am I fear of the coronavirus pandemic Please help me! All instructions are attached!
SOC 350 CNUAS Analytic Memo Research Paper
I am too lazy to do this and am I fear of the coronavirus pandemic Please help me! All instructions are attached!
Grand Canyon University Comparing Piagetian and Vygotskian Theories Essay
Cognition refers to the inner processes and products of the mind that lead to knowing. Cognitive development is the proces ...
Grand Canyon University Comparing Piagetian and Vygotskian Theories Essay
Cognition refers to the inner processes and products of the mind that lead to knowing. Cognitive development is the process of identifying new knowledge through problem-solving and decision-making throughout childhood. The physical and cognitive development of children affects social, emotional, linguistic, and moral development. Gains in physical development and brain growth lead to increases in cognitive abilities such as attending, remembering, symbolizing, categorizing, planning, reasoning, problem-solving, creating, and fantasizing.For this assignment, use "Views on Child Development Venn Diagram" to compare and contrast Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s views on child development.Include information regarding the following theoretical differences and similarities:Role of languageEnvironmental, biological, and cultural influences on developmentThe influence child development has on the learning process according to both theoristsBeneath the diagram, write a 250-500 word reflection on what principles from Piaget and Vygotsky you would like to incorporate into your own teaching practice. Describe the educational implications for classroom practice.Include 3-5 scholarly resources to support your research.
University of Alabama Find Your Greatness Nike Advertisement Discussion Response
I have attached the peer review assignment sheet as well as the two peers i will be evaluating. We are answering the quest ...
University of Alabama Find Your Greatness Nike Advertisement Discussion Response
I have attached the peer review assignment sheet as well as the two peers i will be evaluating. We are answering the questions on the assignment sheet according to the essay drafts i attached. So basically you should have two separate word docs for each draft.
2 pages
A Work Of Visual Art
The Harvesters is the art masterpiece of interest. It depicts a group of harvesters, in a wheat estate. Some harvesters ar ...
A Work Of Visual Art
The Harvesters is the art masterpiece of interest. It depicts a group of harvesters, in a wheat estate. Some harvesters are lying under a tree after a ...
Similar Content
Written Case Analysis discuss the case in terms of finding common ground in the diversity of interests you identify, philosophy homework help (200 words)
Provide a Written Case Analysis approximately 200 words. Identify the moral issues and the parties involved, and infer the...
.…… of which group into India influenced the early beginnings of Vedic
a. Aryans
b. Alamanni c. Akkadians d. Aramaeans
...
I need the answers now to question below comp now dq wk4
Which strategy do you think would be most effective for the conclusion paragraph in your process analysis essay, and why? ...
UBC Urban Planning Collaborative Initiative Discussion
Hi, the questions in yellow is my part that need to be answered. You could take a look on what we have so far and answer t...
Walden University Client Therapy Relationship Age & Ability Discussion
This week begins the preparation for the in-residence component of this course. The Learning Resources for this week explo...
Analyzing Peter Rubens painting using Baroque style from
The work that distinguishes the Baroque period
is stylistically complex, even contradictory. In general, however, the des...
Provincetown
Provincetown (“PTown”) is a unique town with diverse communities. The large Portuguese population in the town originat...
Response To Peer 1 2
Juana's situation is very demanding that she needs someone she can share her problems with to avoid running into depressio...
Public Opinion
Public opinion is the collective individual views, attitudes, and beliefs on a certain topic relevant to a particular comm...
Related Tags
Book Guides
As I Lay Dying
by William Faulkner
American Gods
by Neil Gaiman
Cry the Beloved Country
by Alan Paton
The Old Man and the Sea
by Ernest Hemmingway
Night
by Elie Wiesel
Frankenstein
by Mary Shelley
How to Win at the Sport of Business
by Mark Cuban
The Knife of Never Letting Go
by Patrick Ness
Don Quixote
by Miguel de Cervantes
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Ashford University Virtuous Action and Moral Standards Essay
Assignment Three: Individual-Developed Essay Due : Open Assignment The third essay is to be designed by the individual st ...
Ashford University Virtuous Action and Moral Standards Essay
Assignment Three: Individual-Developed Essay Due : Open Assignment The third essay is to be designed by the individual student. The only stipulation is that it be based in the philosophy of ethics and ethical theory. A research paper is not required; a personal essay is acceptable for this assignment. In the event that you'd rather not develop your own question, I have included several prompts below:Potential PapersBelow are a couple prompts you might use if your imagination otherwise fails you.Remember: you can design your own prompts and write your papers on any relevant topic within the very large realm of the Philosophy of Ethics. (1) In the Nicomachean Ethics – in Book I, Chapter 4 (1105a30-35 and 1105b7-10) and Book I, Chapter 3 (1104b5-10) – Aristotle identifies four conditions that an action must satisfy to count as virtuous. (Roughly, the act must be done knowingly, as the result of the actor having decided on the act because it was virtuous, from a firm and unchanging state, and with enjoyment.) Drawing on the writings of one or more of the following, critique or defend one of these conditions as a necessary condition for an action being virtuous: Julia Annas, John Doris, John Stuart Mill, Immanuel Kant (or any other author you prefer).A successful answer to question (1) might look something like this. (You do not need to follow this outline as long as you answer the stated question.)Offer a short statement in your own words of the condition that you will be defending or criticizing as necessary for an action to be virtuous, followed by the claim that you will be making about it (e.g. “In this paper, drawing on the work of X, I will argue that Y is (not) a necessary condition for an action to be virtuous.”)Provide a paragraph explaining Aristotle’s reasons for identifying the condition as necessary. (Don’t just quote here: make it clear that you understand how Aristotle’s position here fits into his more general views about the nature of virtue.)Offer a defense or criticism of this condition, drawing on one or more of the authors listed above, followed by your own assessment of this defense or criticism.Offer one or perhaps two (critical or supportive) response (s) to this defense or criticism, either one(s) that you yourself devise, or one (s) that draw(s) on one or more of the readings we have done. These may be theoretical responses, or they might be examples or counterexamples that you describe or construct whose connection to the argument you make clear and explicit.Evaluate this response.Present a retort on behalf of Aristotle (or his imagined critic) to the response(s) thatyou have presented.Evaluate this retort.Evaluate the dialectic (though it’s fine if your paper ends in aporia...) (2) Using two or more of the authors we've discussed over the eight weeks, identify one of the roles that principles might play in the explanation or justification of moral action, and criticize or defend the claim that principles play that role. So, for example, you might discuss Daniel Batson’s suggestion that principles serve primarily as devices of rationalization in light of writings by Robert Nozick, or John Stuart Mill, or Immanuel Kant, or Judith Thomson (or vice versa, for one of the claims of one of those authors.) Or you might consider one or more of the principles that Judy Thomson extracts from her discussion of trolley cases in light of the writings of Cass Sunstein, or Fiery Cushman, or Josh Greene. (If you would like to draw on the work of a different author instead, check with your TF first to make sure that your proposal will work.) A successful answer to question (2) might look something like this. (You do not need to follow this outline as long as you answer the stated question.)Articulate the view about the role of principles in explaining or justifying moral action that you plan to defend or criticize, and briefly articulate the grounds on which you intend to defend or criticize this view.Explain your position more precisely, and offer one or more arguments on its behalf: either one(s) that you yourself devise, or one (s) that draw(s) on one or more of the readings we have done. These may be theoretical arguments, or they might be examples or counterexamples that you describe or construct whose connection to the dialectic you make clear and explicit.Response to these arguments (again, perhaps drawing on the work of one or more of our authors.)Evaluate this response, and offer a retort to it.Evaluate this retort.Evaluate the dialectic (though it’s fine if your paper ends in aporia...)(3) Drawing on at least two of the authors that we have read this semester, present and defend a view about the morally correct action in one of the following cases: Bernard Williams’ Jim case, Bernard Williams’ George case, or Judy Thomson’s fat man case. Identify and explain at least one implication of this view for one or more of the moral theories we have discussed.A successful answer to question (3) might look something like this. (You do not need to follow this outline as long as you answer the stated question.)An articulation of the view that you intend to defend. E.g. “In this paper, I will argue that in the X case, the right thing to do is Y. I will show that this means that moral theory M is incorrect (alternatively: that moral theory N is importantly correct) because it assumes that in X-like cases the correct thing to do is [blah].”Offer reasons for your view.Explain why someone might hold the opposite view about the case you areconsidering, and identify the reasoning that lies behind this alternative picture.Identify what you take to be a flaw in that reasoning, and explain why you think youralternative account avoids that flaw.Evaluate this response, and offer a retort to it.Evaluate this retort.Explain the implications of your discussion for one or more of the moral theories wehave discussed.Evaluate the dialectic (though it’s fine if your paper ends in aporia...)
United States History Essay
Essay: Provide a 1-3 page response (written) to the following question.There are a total of ten (10) possible points for t ...
United States History Essay
Essay: Provide a 1-3 page response (written) to the following question.There are a total of ten (10) possible points for this section.We began our class talking about “America the exception.”In other words, America was an exception to the great civilizations of the past (ancient China, Rome, Egypt, etc.) in that American society was not ruled by a monarch or religious official but by the people.The years between the establishment of the Constitution and the Civil War posed a significant challenge to the concept of the “people’s rule” in America.Construct an argumentative essay that discusses the challenges that the expansion of the federal government, the Industrial Revolution, and, most importantly, chattel slavery posed to American freedom and democracy.Why were these issues so challenging and what did America do to “restore” power to the people?
SOC 350 CNUAS Analytic Memo Research Paper
I am too lazy to do this and am I fear of the coronavirus pandemic Please help me! All instructions are attached!
SOC 350 CNUAS Analytic Memo Research Paper
I am too lazy to do this and am I fear of the coronavirus pandemic Please help me! All instructions are attached!
Grand Canyon University Comparing Piagetian and Vygotskian Theories Essay
Cognition refers to the inner processes and products of the mind that lead to knowing. Cognitive development is the proces ...
Grand Canyon University Comparing Piagetian and Vygotskian Theories Essay
Cognition refers to the inner processes and products of the mind that lead to knowing. Cognitive development is the process of identifying new knowledge through problem-solving and decision-making throughout childhood. The physical and cognitive development of children affects social, emotional, linguistic, and moral development. Gains in physical development and brain growth lead to increases in cognitive abilities such as attending, remembering, symbolizing, categorizing, planning, reasoning, problem-solving, creating, and fantasizing.For this assignment, use "Views on Child Development Venn Diagram" to compare and contrast Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s views on child development.Include information regarding the following theoretical differences and similarities:Role of languageEnvironmental, biological, and cultural influences on developmentThe influence child development has on the learning process according to both theoristsBeneath the diagram, write a 250-500 word reflection on what principles from Piaget and Vygotsky you would like to incorporate into your own teaching practice. Describe the educational implications for classroom practice.Include 3-5 scholarly resources to support your research.
University of Alabama Find Your Greatness Nike Advertisement Discussion Response
I have attached the peer review assignment sheet as well as the two peers i will be evaluating. We are answering the quest ...
University of Alabama Find Your Greatness Nike Advertisement Discussion Response
I have attached the peer review assignment sheet as well as the two peers i will be evaluating. We are answering the questions on the assignment sheet according to the essay drafts i attached. So basically you should have two separate word docs for each draft.
2 pages
A Work Of Visual Art
The Harvesters is the art masterpiece of interest. It depicts a group of harvesters, in a wheat estate. Some harvesters ar ...
A Work Of Visual Art
The Harvesters is the art masterpiece of interest. It depicts a group of harvesters, in a wheat estate. Some harvesters are lying under a tree after a ...
Earn money selling
your Study Documents