We have explored the tension between your preferences of ideal leader attributes and those expressed by others. We have reflected on the importance of inclusivity in collective leadership as a means of cultivating collective genius in order to address adaptive challenges. Explain in detail all 5 questions. How organizational prototypes and individual preferred leadership traits can be both stabilizing and dangerous? Why it is important to trouble our acceptance of prototypes within organizations and encourage the inclusion of those who are non-prototypical? How cybernetic/traditional leadership approaches contrast with emergent, collective, and relational ones and why the later ones require more courageous leadership? Explain how through the use of appreciative inquiry, design thinking, and humble inquiry, collective leadership can address adaptive challenges and cultivate a collective genius?  How does your own leader identity contrast or complement this call for collective leadership and how will you target your own leader identity development?