1.Capstone Case: Montana v. EgelhoffIn July 1992, while camping out in the Yaak region of northwestern Montana, Respondent Egelhoff made friends with Roberta Pavola and John Christenson. On Sunday, July 12, the three spent much of the day and evening drinking, in bars and at a private party. At about midnight that night, officers of the Lincoln County, Montana, sheriff’s department, responding to reports of a possible drunk driver, discovered Christenson’s station wagon stuck in a ditch along U.S. Highway 2. In the front seat were Pavola and Christenson, each dead from a single gunshot to the head. In the rear of the car lay Egelhoff, alive and yelling obscenities. His blood-alcohol content measured .36 percent over one hour later. After being charged with two counts of homicide, Engelhoff attempted to assert an intoxication defense, but this was denied by the trial court.How does a claim that (a) an intoxicated defendant should not be held responsible for his or her criminal activity because of the inability to form the requisite mens rea for a specific crime differ from the claim that (b) an intoxicated defendant should be excused because he or she had lowered inhibitions and impaired judgment as a consequence of ingesting alcohol? Do both claims carry the same moral weight?Do you believe that, as a matter of fundamental due process rights, a defendant should be given the opportunity to present “all relevant evidence to rebut the State’s evidence on all elements of the offense charged”? Why or why not?Minimum word count of 600, not including references. Cite references in APA format. include intext refernces.2.Read the Court’s opinion in Carter v. State, 710 So. 2d 110 (Fla. App. 1998). Based on this opinion, explain why involuntary intoxication is treated differently from voluntary intoxication as a criminal defense.Minimum word count of 500, not including references. Cite references in APA format. include intext refernces.3.Capstone Case: Commonwealth v. SchnoppsOn October 13, 1979, Marilyn R. Schnopps was fatally shot by her estranged husband George A. Schnopps. A jury convicted Schnopps of murder in the first degree, and he was sentenced to the mandatory term of life imprisonment. Schnopps claims that the trial judge erred by refusing to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter. Schnopps claimed that he was provoked into killing his wife after learning of her marital infidelity.Were the wife’s comments so shocking as to be tantamount to the defendant’s actually catching her in an adulterous act with her lover?What are the implications of extending the provocation doctrine in infidelity cases from actually witnessing a spouse committing adultery to learning about it verbally?Minimum word count of 500, not including references. Cite references in APA format. include intext refernces.4.Read the two other “provocation” cases in your textbook—People v. McCarthy, 547 N. E. 2d 459 (Ill. 1989) and Girouard v. State, 583 A. 2d 718 (Md. App. 1991)—where defendants asserted victim provocation as mitigation against homicide charges. What conditions or circumstances do the courts identify as being adequate enough to constitute possible reduced charges in homicide cases?Minimum word count of 500, not including references. Cite references in APA format. include intext refernces.

W2PA1-1Go back through the business press ( Fortune, The Economist, BusinessWeek, etc. and any other LIRN-based articles) and find at least three articles related to either downsizing, implementation of a new technology, or a merger or acquisition. In a 2 page, APA formatted in single spaceRequirements:In about 2 pages Needs to be done strongly ORIGINAL work:In APA 6th edition  format a mustCitations and reference list a must (please use MS Word’s “References” tab to insert Citation)Answers all questions need to be completely demonstrating knowledge and understanding of key concepts, ability to think critically, and has included original examples in response.It is required that the textbook and/or scholarly research be included to justify and/or solidify any argument or reasoningTextbook info: International Business Competing in the Global Marketplace 2016, 11th edition, by Charles W.L. Hill G. Tomas M HultWrite a 2-page paper in single space in response to a case study or similar assignment provided by your professor. Answers are to be clear, well-organized, and specific. Provide a concise, cogent argument and include details to support your response. Follow  following requirements:o Content  rich, all questions and their parts have been answered and communicates substantive, accurate, and evidence-based analysis and critical thought.o Effective in supporting the student's argument. The student provides supporting evidence for the argumento Well organized with a logical flow, contains correct grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.o Follow all formatting guidelines, including page-length and APA formatting requirements.o The student is able to effectively demonstrate the ability to draw logical and valid conclusions based on the supporting researched based evidence presented.o Use at least 5 quality peer-reviewed and scholarly resources (non-website based) outside of the textbook to support your argument.Here questions:1. What were the key frontline experiences listed in relation to your chosen change?2. How do they relate to those listed in Chapter 4?   2.1. Did you identify new ones confronting change managers?3. How would you prioritize these experiences?    3.1. Do any stand out as "deal breakers”?    3.2. Why?4. What new insights into implementing this type of change emerges  from this?

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.Step 1) Refer to Refer to "Pitney Bowes: Employer Health Strategy."Step 2) Write a paper of at least 750 words written in the third person voice using the requirements below. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. You must address the following topics using the section headers (labels) in bold in order:Section 1- Introduction- In this section, describe what the memo is going to be about; it mentions the upcoming sections.Section 2- Rationale For Expenditures in Health- Why was Pitney Bowes spending so much on employee health at a time when most organizations were cutting health benefits?Section 3- The Value of Health & Wellness Program- How did the company's health and wellness programs add value?Section 4- Evaluation of the Company’s Health Plan and Pharmacy Benefits- Evaluate the company's approach to selecting and designing a health plan, and pharmacy benefits.Section 5- Improvements & Constraints to Address- How would you improve the company's plan? What challenges and constraints must be addressed?Section 6- References- has at least 2 peer-reviewed/scholarly references from the databases within the library. The references are also integrated within the paper.Organization / Development RequirementsThe 6 required sections are organized separately in sequence as listed above.The memo is at least 750 words in length (excluding references and headers) size 12 Times New Roman font with double spacing text.Each section is labelled with the section header prescribed above.Mechanical RequirementsFormatting or layout and graphics must be pleasing to the eye (font, colors, spacing).Rules of grammar, word usage, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling are followed.Sentences are complete, clear, varied, and concise with proper syntax.Size 12 Times New Roman font for main body text and References is used.Double spacing between sentences and in References section is used.