The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy “Presidents (Ronald Regan) ‘Doctrines,’ (Ronald Reagan 1981–1989 Sponsor Anti-Communist guerrillas who are trying to overthrow pro-Soviet regimes). Roskin, M. G. (2017). IR, 11th Edition Then write a three to five (3-5) page paper on the Ronald Regan doctrine that a president used. Your research must include at least four (4) credible sources, apart from your textbook. Your paper must address the following: Summarize a situation that required U.S. diplomatic efforts during the president’s time in office. Explicate the diplomatic doctrine the president followed, with reference to specific actions or events that occurred. Describe the effects of these diplomatic efforts for the U.S. and other countries. Assess, in conclusion, the advantages and disadvantages of the particular doctrine that was followed. Cite at least four (4) reputable sources in addition to the textbook, not including Wikipedia, encyclopedias, or dictionaries. The specific research associated with this assignment are: Identify the cultural, economic, and political context of information resources, and interpret information in light of that context. Use technology and information resources to research issues in international problems. Write clearly and concisely about international problems using proper writing mechanics. Your assignment must: Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Textbook Strayer, Robert. Eric Nelson. (2019) Ways of the World with Sources Volume 2. Boston. Bedford/St. Martins.Choose one of the question-clusters below to address in your essay:Read carefully the primary sources found in the “Working with Evidence” section at the end of Chapter 20. Write an essay addressing the following question: In what ways did these authors find fault with mainstream western societies and their political and social values? How did their solutions depart from mainstream political and social values? Be sure that your essay shows awareness of the chapter as a whole.Read carefully the primary sources found in the “Working with Evidence” section at the end of Chapter 20. Write an essay addressing the following question: To what extent were the ideas in these documents new and revolutionary? To what extent did their ideas reflect long-standing traditions in their societies? What aspects of modern life did they accept and what aspects of it did they reject? Be sure that your essay shows awareness of the chapter as a whole.Expectations:Submit to the Dropbox by 11.59 p.m., SundayYour thesis statement should reflect the question-cluster you have chosen. Be sure to base your response on the documents themselves and the information provided in the preceding chapter. As you plan your essay, be sure to pay attention to format instruction on the syllabus, and to the guide document on essays, located in the Course Overview page in the Start Here module.The essay must be: Between 1000 and 1200 words in lengthDouble-spaced, using a normal-sized font, such as Times New Roman 12-pointProperly cited: Cite sources—whether directly quoted, paraphrased or summarized--using Chicago-Style citationUse appropriate scholarly sources rather than dubious sources such as WikipediaPlagiarism free: Contain no plagiarism whatsoever; any plagiarized material will receive zero points and may result in further action as per College policySubmitted to the course Dropbox in Word .doc, .docx, or in .rtf format Be sure that your essay actually points to evidence from the documents. Show me, don’t just tell me.