COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION PROJECTthis is an APA style research essay. Instructions attached along with grading criteria

Part1:These short weekly reading journal posts (400-500 words) will be your opportunity to reflect critically on the readings assigned for that week. These posts are an exercise in engaging all of the reading questions provided using evidence from the reading and also beginning to ask your own questions. Each response should include at least 2-3 pieces of evidence for your ideas from the reading you are responding to; at least 1-2 statements of your own analysis of the reading; and (overall for the entire post) at least 1-2 questions that you have identified as thought-provoking or interesting to you in the readings. Please number your answers indicating your response to each question. The lowest reading journal post grade will be dropped.You must include page numbers in each post. I do not require any specific citation format. Just include (author last name, page number) at the end of the relevant sentences. Please note that you must cite when you draw any ideas from the text, whether or not you explicitly quote it. And you must draw your ideas from the text because that is the assignment. Please be sure that if and when you use a direct quotation from the reading, you also explain what that quotation means in your own words.Mutua argues that the grandiosity of the human rights movement is underpinned by the savages-victims-saviors (SVS) metaphor. What does the SVS construction say? How is it used?What is the tension between local and universal that Mutua discusses, and what does he say tends to happen between the local and universal in the context of colonialism and its legacies?What is Mutua's critique of "the metaphor of the victim" in human rights discourse?What were the four castes/classes, in other words the social groupings of people, (that Knight describes) in Haiti leading up to the revolution? Next to each class, list the kinds of rights they were demanding.Part 2: These short weekly reading journal posts (400-500 words) will be your opportunity to reflect critically on the readings assigned for that week. These posts are an exercise in engaging all of the reading questions provided using evidence from the reading and also beginning to ask your own questions. Each response should include at least 2-3 pieces of evidence for your ideas from the reading you are responding to; at least 1-2 statements of your own analysis of the reading; and (overall for the entire post) at least 1-2 questions that you have identified as thought-provoking or interesting to you in the readings. Please number your answers indicating your response to each question. The lowest reading journal post grade will be dropped.You must include page numbers in each post. I do not require any specific citation format. Just include (author last name, page number) at the end of the relevant sentences. Please note that you must cite when you draw any ideas from the text, whether or not you explicitly quote it. And you must draw your ideas from the text because that is the assignment. Please be sure that if and when you use a direct quotation from the reading, you also explain what that quotation means in your own words.What is the "transnational legal space" on which Dale focuses in this chapter?Dale talks about the "discursive ambivalence toward human rights" exhibited by corporate and state actors. What does he mean?What is Falk's notion of the citizen-pilgrim?What is Falk proposing with his notion of the "global parliament"?For our in-class discussion, please review Falk's explanation of the horizons of feasibility, horizons of necessity, and horizons of desire. (No need to write anything here; just review for yourself before our class session).