Free will and compatibilism

Anonymous
timer Asked: Nov 6th, 2016

Question description

Very few philosophers still believe in free will, although most students and ordinary people do. That is because it is very difficult to deny that our actions can be explained by some combination of genes and environment, or that changes in brain chemistry alter behavior. So, the question is whether it still makes sense to talk about morality. Stace claims that morality and ethics are compatible with determinism, while Pereboom claims they are not, although Pereboom claims that we could still praise and blame people for their actions. What is Stace's argument for compatibilism? How would Pereboom criticize Stace’s solution and argue for incompatibilism? And how could praise and blame still be possible with incompatibilism, according to Pereboom?

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Studypool Tutor
School: University of Maryland
Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students
flag Report DMCA
Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags
Study Guides

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors