Trademark Dilution Assignment

timer Asked: Nov 20th, 2016

Question description

“TRADEMARK DILUTION,” available at ttps:// The film is approximately 30 minutes in length.

  1. Does the owner of a famous trademark have to prove economic harm of its mark prior to filing a dilution cause of action? What section of the Lanham Act specifically addresses this question?
  2. What kind of evidence does the modern trademark owner normally submit to the court in order to prove that its mark has achieved fame?
  3. How specifically did the 2006 Trademark Dilution Revision Act change the Lanham Act with respect to a dilution cause of action?
  4. Do you agree with the 2011 Starbucks court’s decision on remand that there was only a “loose connection” between the defendant’s mark CHARBUCKS and the plaintiff’s mark STARBUCKS, despite evidence of the defendant’s bad intent? Why or why not?
  5. Do you think the plaintiff’s design mark used on its jeans in Levi Strauss v. Abercrombie Fitch is distinctive pursuant to Section 45 of the Lanham Act? Why or why not?
  6. Do you think that the defendant in Harris Research, Inc. v. Lydon has a valid defense that its CHEM WHO? mark is a parody? Why or why not?

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students
flag Report DMCA
Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags
Study Guides

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors