nstructionsUsing class material, the articles listed below, and research where appropriate develop a 6-8-page research paper that addresses the relationship of structure to culture in creating an effective and efficient place to work. For this assignment, you will evaluate the strategies managers can utilize to impact organizational structure and culture. Address the following in your paper:Explain how organizational structure interfaces with organizational culture to create a smooth work and decision-making flow. Be sure to include a discussion of how organizational purpose relates to the relationship between the integration of structure and culture.Select two organizations from the best places to work. Research and describe their structures and cultures.Select two organizations from the worst places to work. Research and describe their structures and cultures.Identify and explain why the structure and culture work well in those organizations that are deemed best places to work. Identify and explain what does not work well in structure and culture in those organizations that are not favored by their employees.In the case of the disliked organizations, recommend three strategic ways a manager could improve the interface of structure and culture.Finally, many large organizations are trying to transition to smaller more flexible structures. Suggest at least three management strategies that can make a bureaucratic organization a more team-oriented, collaborative, and inclusive culture.Use of at least five scholarly articles and other professional sources to support your work. Additional Requirements and How to Prepare the SubmissionAPA formatting with in-text citations and a reference list is required.Read the grading rubric for the assignmentCheck the instructions to make sure all elements of the assignment have been covered.Third-person writing is required. Third-person means that there are no words such as “I, me, my, we, or us” (first-person writing), nor is there use of “you or your” (second-person writing). If uncertain how to write in the third person, view this link: https://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/gramma... .Contractions are not used in business writing, so the expectation is that students do not use contractions in assignments.Paraphrase and do not use direct quotation marks. This means you do not use more than four consecutive words from a source document, put a passage from a source document into your own words and attribute the passage to the source document. Provide the page or paragraph number. Note that a reference within a reference list cannot exist without an associated in-text citation and vice versa.Do not use books as source material.Students are expected to use a variety as well as multiple course readings and research to support ideas, reasoning, and conclusions.Submit the final project into the appropriate assignment submission folder. NOTE: All submitted work is to be your original work. You may not use any work from another student, the Internet or an online clearinghouse. You are expected to understand the Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism Policy and know that it is your responsibility to learn about instructor and general academic expectations with regard to proper citation of sources as specified in the APA Publication Manual, 7th Ed. (Students are held accountable for in-text citations and an associated reference list only). Additional Sources may include:The Best Companies to Work For10 Unmistakeable Signs of a Toxic CultureForbes Just CompaniesForbes Best EmployersForbes Best CompaniesMoney Worst Companies to Work For100 Great Places to WorkDue DateOct 6, 2020 11:59 PMHide Rubrics Rubric Name: Org Structure- 10% This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. Criteria ExcellentGoodDevelopingNeeds ImprovementFailingCriterion Score Analysis of structure and culture design interfaces to make a more efficient/effective organization Add Feedback 2 points Analysis of interface was logically concluded by using ideas that were supported from a thorough use of class material; reflects an insightful and complex understanding of how together they make efficient and effective organizations(1.8-2.0) 1.7 points Analysis of interface was logically concluded by using ideas that were supported from a thorough use of class and research material; reflects a good understanding of how together they make efficient and effective organizations but either structure or culture was underdeveloped.(1.6-1.799) 1.5 points Analysis of interface was mostly logically concluded by using ideas that were supported from an adequate use of class and research material; reflected a general understanding of how together they make efficient and effective organizations but was underdeveloped overall. (1.4-1.599) 1.3 points Discussion attempt was poor because of lack of support from class material, and research. Examples were not always present and criteria were weakly or incorrectly addressed.(1.2-1.39) 0 points Explanation was not made or minimal depth to the explanation leaving the impression of an incorrect or unsupported understanding of the concepts.(0- 1.19) / 2 / 2 * Criterion score has been overridden Evaluation of 2 "good to work for" companies Add Feedback 0.5 points Selections were clearly and definitively made with evaluation. (.45-.50) 0.425 points Selections were clearly made and reasoning was slightly underdeveloped(.40-.449) 0.37555 points Selections were clearly made but reasoning contained opinion and was underdeveloped overall.(.35-.399) 0.325 points Discussion about both exists but discussion of why was vague and not illustrated well(.30-.349) 0 points No choice offered or missing selection reasoning.(0.299) / 0.5 / 0.5 * Criterion score has been overridden Evaluation of 2 "not good to work for" focusing on the company's culture and structure design Add Feedback 0.5 points Selections were clearly and definitively made with detailed evaluation and reasoning focusing on structure and culture(.45-.50) 0.425 points Selections were clearly made and reasoning was slightly underdeveloped(.40-.449) 0.375 points Selections were clearly made but reasoning contained opinion and was underdeveloped overall.(.35-.399) 0.25 points Discussion about both exists but discussion of why was vague and not illustrated well (.30-.349 0 points No choice offered or missing selection reasoning. (0-.299) / 0.5 / 0.5 * Criterion score has been overridden Critical analysis of culture and structure work well in good workplaces Add Feedback 1 point Excellent critical analysis of when culture and structure work well in good workplaces were logically concluded by using ideas that were supported from a thorough use of class material; reflects an insightful and complex understanding of how together they make efficient and effective organizations(.90-1.0) 0.85 points Explanation and examples of why culture and structure work well in good workplaces were concluded by using ideas that were supported from a thorough use of class and research material; reasoning shows a good understanding of how together they make efficient and effective organizations but either structure or culture was underdeveloped.(.80- .899) 0.75 points Explanation and examples of why culture and structure work well in good workplaces were supported from an adequate use of class and research material; discussion reflected a general understanding of how structure and culture work together but was underdeveloped overall.(.70-.799) 0.65 points Discussion attempt was poor because of lack of support from class material, and research. Examples were not always present and criteria were weakly or incorrectly addressed.(.60-.699) 0 points Explanation was not made or minimal depth to the explanation leaving the impression of an incorrect or unsupported understanding of the concepts.(0- .59) / 1 / 1 * Criterion score has been overridden Critical analysis of culture and structure do not work well in bad workplaces Add Feedback 1 point Excellent critical analysis of when culture and structure do not work well in bad workplaces were logically concluded by using ideas that were supported from a thorough use of class material; reflects an insightful and complex understanding of how together they make inefficient and ineffective organizations(.90-1.0) 0.85 points Explanation and examples of why culture and structure do not work well in bad workplaces were concluded by using ideas that were supported from a thorough use of class and research material; reasoning shows a good understanding of how together they make efficient and effective organizations but either structure or culture was underdeveloped.(.80- .899) 0.75 points Explanation and examples of why culture and structure do not work well in bad workplaces were supported from an adequate use of class and research material; discussion reflected a general understanding of how structure and culture work together but was underdeveloped overall.(.70-.799) 0.65 points Discussion attempt was poor because of lack of support from class material, and research. Examples were not always present and criteria were weakly or incorrectly addressed.(.60-.699) 0 points Explanation was not made or minimal depth to the explanation leaving the impression of an incorrect or unsupported understanding of the concepts.(0- .59) / 1 / 1 * Criterion score has been overridden Specific strategies for improvement for the bad companies with support Add Feedback 2 points Strategies for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were thoroughly supported by course and research material and showed insightful and complex understanding as to how the improvement recommendations will lead to success(1.8-2.0) 1.7 points Recommendations for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material but 1 to 2 minor areas in the discussion were underdeveloped because of missing connections between either structure or culture (1.6-1.799) 1.5 points Most recommendations for improvement are concluded using logical reasoning (justification) that were supported by course and research material with missing connections.(1.4-1.599) 1.3 points Attempt was made to make recommendations but most were missing; those presented were either unclear or implied; conclusions derived from logical reasoning supported by the facts, class material and research was minimal or not present.(1.2-1.39) 0 points (0- 1.19) / 2 / 2 * Criterion score has been overridden Analysis of reading materials for recommendations of how companies can move from bureaucratic to flexible companies and why it is necessary Add Feedback 1 point Analysis was insightful, comprehensive, and the reasoning justified the need for the recommendations given. All was supported by class material and research.(.90-1.0) 0.85 points .Analysis was, comprehensive, and the reasoning mostly justified the need for the recommendations given, but some aspects were underdeveloped. All was supported by class material and research. (.80-.899) 0.75 points Analysis was, general and the reasoning sufficiently justified the need for the recommendations given, but some most aspects were underdeveloped. All was supported by class material and research.(.70-.799) 0.65 points Attempt was made to justify recommendations made but those presented were either unclear or implied; those conclusions present were rarely derived from logical reasoning supported by the facts, class material and research or not present(.60-.699) 0 points Explanation was not made or minimal depth to the explanation leaving the impression of an incorrect or unsupported understanding of the concepts.(0-.59) / 1 / 1 * Criterion score has been overridden Outside Research Selection: materials used show academic validity and are appropriate for the topic intended Add Feedback 1 point More than the required sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion. (.90-1.0) 0.85 points Required outside sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion(.80- .899) 0.75 points Required outside sources were used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and they mostly were of academic quality and demonstrated appropriate application to the topic under discussion. . (.70-.799) 0.65 points Less than the required outside research source was used to support the ideas and conclusions drawn throughout the paper and/or the academic quality was not valid or failed to be appropriate to the topic under discussion.(.60-.699) 0 points No outside reference material was used.(0- .599) / 1 / 1 * Criterion score has been overridden Writing Mechanics Add Feedback 0.5 points Strictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English using paragraphs and sentence rather than bullets, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic errors, spelling and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used. 0 to 2 errors noted.(.45-.50) 0.425 points Excellently adheres to standard usage of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 3 to 6 errors noted.(.40-.449) 0.375 points Satisfactorily adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. 7 to 10 errors noted.(.35-.399) 0.325 points Minimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. More than 10 errors found.(.30-.349) 0 points Does not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics: conventions of written English largely incomprehensible; or errors are too plentiful to count.(0-.299) / 0.5 / 0.5 * Criterion score has been overridden APA Style (7th ed.) Add Feedback 0.5 points One to 2 APA style or usage errors; Proper citation of source material is used throughout paper; Reference titles follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized.(.45-.50) 0.425 points Attempts in-text citations and reference list but 3 - 4 APA style errors noted or fails to use APA citations when appropriate 1-2 times.(.40-.449) 0.375 points Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; APA style errors are noted throughout document with 5-6 errors noted; Fails to use APA citations when appropriate 3 - 4 times in document.(.35-.399) 0.325 points Attempts in-text citations and reference lists; Fails to use APA citation when appropriate 5-6 times; Fails to use APA citations when appropriate 5-6 times in document or presents a total of 1-2 in-text citations and reference list in a paper when requires APA citations are needed throughout the document.(.30-.349) 0 points No attempt at APA style; or attempts either in-text citations or reference list but omits the other.(0-.299) / 0.5 / 0.5 * Criterion score has been overridden Rubric Total Score Total Total Score Clear Override / 10 / 10

Deliverable 7 - Senior Risk Analyst PresentationCompetenciesConstruct a framework for identifying, evaluating, and categorizing risk and risk management tools.Appraise the relationship between a heightened regulatory environment and corporate governance.Evaluate the components of operational risk and the application of corresponding risk management plans.Evaluate the principles of risk and reward in the investment sector and its applications to the broader area of risk management.ScenarioLTD Acceptance is a private property and auto insurance carrier that specializes in sports cars and motorcycles. This organization is owned by LTD Capital, a large equity group with over 15 holdings. LTD Acceptance is the parent company's single largest holding as it drives 70% of total revenue. Due to the inherent risk involved in that segment of the market, many of LTD Acceptance's competitors do not offer policies for sports cars or motorcycles. This market segment is underserved which is why the organization has 20,000 active policies for a sports car or a motorcycle.LTD is headquartered in Houston, TX. LTD does not sell insurance directly to the public. Instead, it uses third-party agents to sell its policies. LTD handles all customer service needs including claims intake, policy services, and general questions. The company operates in four states: California, Texas, Louisiana, and Florida. Currently, LTD does not have an active system in place to ensure that its agents are in fact using LTD guidelines to screen potential policyholders. However, no evidence of negligence has emerged so far as the organization has yet to have a year in which it was not profitable. LTD has also had the good fortune of not suffering losses because of natural disasters or catastrophic events.InstructionsYou have been hired for the role of Senior Risk Analyst. This means that you are responsible for overseeing and managing the organization's all risk management activities. Before you can design a plan to manage risks, your first task is to identify the primary risk exposures the organization should acknowledge. The organization is also concerned about threats to its operational efficacy. Therefore, you need to also identify operational risk exposures and explain why operational losses must be categorized. The board is also seeking your input on the relationship between risk and reward and how it pertains to the company's investment portfolio. Your supervisor has asked you to create a PowerPoint presentation of your report. Remember your audience when crafting your presentation, and include the following slides:Title slideEvaluate the significance of identifying risks and address the ramifications of failing to do so.Identify two insurance regulations and analyze their roles in managing risks within the insurance industry.Identify the market, business, and compliance risks LTD encounters.Explain why the operational losses cannot be broadly managed. Why do they have to be categorized?Examine the relationship between risk and reward and how it pertains to investing.Explain why effective financial management correlates with risk management.Your conclusion slide should include at least three risk management activities relevant to insurance (and your rationale for choosing them specifically) and how they link to enhanced organizational effectiveness.Grading RubricFFCBA01234Not SubmittedNo PassCompetenceProficiencyMasteryNot SubmittedAt least one slide requirement is missing.All required slides are included.All required slides are included, along with any supporting explanations or examples.All required slides are included, along with any supporting explanations or examples and are professionally presented.Not SubmittedInaccurate discussion on the importance of identifying risks is included OR no discussion on the importance of identifying risks is included OR appropriate consequences of failing to identify risks are not included.Accurate discussion on the importance of identifying risks is included AND appropriate consequences of failing to identify each risk mentioned are included.Accurate discussion that utilizes specific examples of the importance of identifying risks is included AND appropriate consequences of failing to identify each risk mentioned are included.Thorough and accurate discussion that utilizes specific examples of the importance of identifying risks is included AND appropriate consequences of failing to identify each risk mentioned are fully explained.Not SubmittedLess than two insurance regulations are accurately analyzed in their role in managing risk in the insurance industry.Two insurance regulations (laws or acts) are accurately analyzed in their role in managing risk in the insurance industry.Two insurance regulations (laws or acts) are thoroughly and accurately analyzed in their role in managing risk in the insurance industry.More than two insurance regulations (laws or acts) are thoroughly and accurately analyzed in their role in managing risk in the insurance industry.Not SubmittedNo valid risks are identified for at least one area (market, compliance, and business).At least one valid risk relevant to LTD is identified for each area (market, compliance, and business).At least one valid risk relevant to LTD is identified and explained for each area (market, compliance, and business).More than one valid risk relevant to LTD is identified and explained for each area (market, compliance, and business).Not SubmittedInaccurate discussion of why operational losses must be categorized is included OR no discussion of why operational losses must be categorized is included.Accurate discussion of why operational losses must be categorized is included.Accurate explanation that utilizes specific examples of why operational losses must be categorized is included.Thorough and accurate explanations that utilize specific examples of why operational losses must be categorized are included.Not SubmittedInaccurate discussion of how the relationship between risk and reward relates to investing is included OR no discussion of how the relationship between risk and reward relates to investing is included.Accurate discussion of how the relationship between risk and reward relates to investing.Accurate explanation that utilizes specific examples of how the relationship between risk and reward relates to investing.Thorough and accurate explanations that utilize specific examples of how the relationship between risk and reward relates to investingNot SubmittedInaccurate discussion that utilizes specific examples to explain how effective financial management correlates with risk management OR no discussion to explain how effective financial management correlates with risk management.Accurate discussion of how effective financial management correlates with risk management.Accurate explanation that utilizes specific examples to examine how effective financial management correlates with risk management.Thorough and accurate explanations that utilize specific examples to examine how effective financial management correlates with risk management.Not SubmittedConclusion slide(s) does not summarize at least three pertinent risk management activities OR does not describe how at least one affects organizational effectiveness.Conclusion slide(s) summarizes at least three pertinent risk management activities AND describes how each affects organizational effectiveness. Includes rationale for selection.Conclusion slide(s) thoroughly summarizes the details of at least three pertinent risk management activities AND explains how each affects organizational effectiveness. Includes rationale for selection.Conclusion slide(s) thoroughly summarizes the details of more than three pertinent risk management activities AND provides deep and meaningful insight on how each affects organizational effectiveness. Includes rationale for selection