Description
What do you think are the most important reasons for low public trust in government? How could public trust in government be increased?
Must be at lest 200 words
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
Running Head: PUBLIC TRUST IN GOVERNMENT
Public Trust in Government
Institution Affiliation
Date:
1
PUBLIC TRUST IN GOVERNMENT
2
According to surveys done in the USA, it was found that the trust the public has in the
government has been declining. Americans today are not content with their government thus
making them unable to trust the said government. The majority of the American...
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Just what I was looking for! Super helpful.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
Synthesis Paper – Leadership Style
Synthesis is the act of creating something new from multiple existing entities. Synthesis of research, then, is creating a ...
Synthesis Paper – Leadership Style
Synthesis is the act of creating something new from multiple existing entities. Synthesis of research, then, is creating a new idea from existing ideas. It is a process developed through time and practice. In this assignment, you will apply the synthesis process to the course journal readings and your selected readings. As you synthesize, consider how leadership style influences leadership practice and results. For example, leadership style effects followers through the choice of public vs. private engagement or the use of public praise vs. active coaching. In some cases, what a leader does not say or do can have a significant effect on both the sense of value and the motivation of group members.General Requirements:Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Refer to the annotated bibliography and outline you created in the Module 2 assignment along with the assignment feedback from your instructor.
Locate at least two additional, topically-related, empirical articles. Use "Empirical Research Checklist" to guide your selection.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:Locate the annotated bibliography and outline you created in the Module 2 assignment. Using the outline you developed, the information from the annotated bibliography, and the feedback provided by your instructor, write a paper (2,000-2,250 words) that synthesizes three of the articles assigned in the first two modules of this course with the two (or more) topically-related, empirical articles you selected. Do that by including the following:
A statement of at least three common themes addressed in all of the articles.
A statement of the conclusions that can be drawn when the articles are taken together as a single entity. What is the overall message of the group of articles? Focus specifically on the connection between leadership style and leadership theory in areas such as individual identity, culture, and worldview. What are the potential effects of these and other individual leadership characteristics and style; how do they influence the methods leaders choose to guide groups or organizations?Attached below are the articles. Once the assignment is posted, I will add the teacher comments and etc that is mentioned in the information above.
Philosophy on Primal Religions Paper
Requirements:1- Each answer must have 250 words or more 2- You must read the article BEFORE answering. Do not copy anyth ...
Philosophy on Primal Religions Paper
Requirements:1- Each answer must have 250 words or more 2- You must read the article BEFORE answering. Do not copy anything from the internet. They must be YOUR Own Thoughts.4- Do not cite too much. With one or two citations is enough. Note: Do not use outside resources besides the one that I give you. EACH ANSWER HAVE THEIR OWN book.5- Read the articles.6- critical thinking. Please1- In what sense are primal religions primal?Resource: Huston Smith: The world Religion “ the primal religion”2- What is Pals’ reservation about explaining religion using an “aggressively reductionist functionalism”? Which theorists are supposed to fall under that description? Resource Daniel l pals : eight theories of religion: Society as sacred: Emile Durkheim3- Though Smith warns against romanticizing the primal religions, it is hard to see that he has avoided the tendency. Yes or no? What is it about primal religion that so much draws his admiration?Resource: Huston Smith: The world Religion “ the primal religion”4- Armstrong describes two versions of the Flood Myth – from the Artrahasis and the Gilgamesh. How do you explain the differences she describes? In particular, how would you describe the implicit contrast with the Flood Myth as it appears in Genesis? Resource Karen Armstrong: A short history of myth “ the early civilization”5- Importantly, Smith claims that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are each “historical” religions, in a way that Hinduism and Buddhism are not. What does he have in mind by “historical” if the idea is supposed to distinguish the Eastern and Western Religious traditions?Resource: Huston Smith: The world Religion “ judaism ”6- Very often Christians will read backwards from Christianity to Judaism, and when they do that they usually light onto the idea of “Messiah”. How close is the Judaic idea of Messiah to the idea as it later is used by Christians? If there is more than one idea of ‘Messiah’ or ‘Messianic Ideal’ around, how are they distinguished from one another? Resource: Huston Smith: The world Religion “ judaism ”7- One idea of Judaism that regularly draws fire is the idea of a “chosen people”. Why is that such a hot-button? Smith is anxious to interpret that idea in a way that defuses it? How does he try to do that, and how successful would you say he is?Resource: Huston Smith: The world Religion “ judaism ”
4 pages
Latin America Security Issues Final Finaal
Which of the definitions of security are most relevant to the nations in Latin America? How Ideally, security when defined ...
Latin America Security Issues Final Finaal
Which of the definitions of security are most relevant to the nations in Latin America? How Ideally, security when defined represents a ...
Valdosta State University Literature Comparison Discussion
Write an essay of at least 1000 words,MLA formatting Select any two (2) works from Unit 2 and/or Unit 3, and compare them ...
Valdosta State University Literature Comparison Discussion
Write an essay of at least 1000 words,MLA formatting Select any two (2) works from Unit 2 and/or Unit 3, and compare them through the selected works’ genre(s), such as travel literature, essay, drama, novel, and/or satire. Consider how the form and the content inform each other in each work. (You are only selecting 2 works.)use Johnathan Swift " A modest proposal for Unit 2, and Matsua Basho Unit 3 https://youtu.be/90-2Dg2CJdw
PSY 626 SNHU Applying Feedback and Expanding Your Case Research Report
Attached is the rubric and apa 7 format guidelines also an example of how the milestone one is suppose to look like is att ...
PSY 626 SNHU Applying Feedback and Expanding Your Case Research Report
Attached is the rubric and apa 7 format guidelines also an example of how the milestone one is suppose to look like is attached as well. Attached is also the PSY 622(Interview journal screening one) screening please edit and change anything that needs to be changed there was no feedback on it except a good job done. Please follow this teachers rubric and example to fix the paper/write it based on the PSY 622 screening. Also Milestone one from PSY 622 is attached. The correct APA 6th edition citation for your course textbook is as follows: Skeem, J. L., Douglas, K. S., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (Eds.). (2009). Science in the courtroom: Consensus and controversy. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. The matching in-text citation would read (Skeem, Douglas, & Lilienfeld, 2009).Week 2 Announcement: Assignment RemindersMilestone OneThis week your first milestone assignment is due (“Applying Feedback and Expanding Your Case Report”). Components of your paper that should have already been completed at the most basic level in PSY622 include the following: Client Capacity (Daubert Standard, Interview Information, Collateral Information, Recommendations, Ethical Standards), Risk Assessment (Daubert, Interview Information, Collateral Information, Recommendations, Ethical Guidelines). Given that you have ethical standards in the PSY 622 case report, you will be substantially expanding on these sections. Remember, this is a completely different class from 622 and these assignments should be treated as new assignments, using only the basic content from the 622 Case Report as a framework to build on in this class. There is no exact way to complete these milestones, so feel free to be creative and also use the milestone examples sent via email in Week 1 if you are feeling stuck on what kind of content to include. Remember, it’s a good idea to model your sections after the rubric to ensure that you have included all sections (the theories section, for example, is sometimes forgotten in student submissions).Also as a reminder, ONLY include the sections being requested for this assignment (risk assessment; Daubert Standard as it applies to risk assessment; ethical considerations). You can include information from the interview if it is relevant to this milestone topic (risk assessment). o Please, do not submit your entire case report or you will be asked to resubmit the assignment that addresses the content due for only the milestone being requested. When working on your risk assessment section, do not include “recommendations” or other content that does not pertain to risk (such as general psychological assessment, therapy/interventions, etc.), because the rubric is not addressing these sections. Please do not submit a working copy of your final paper where you continually add sections to the final paper and submit as a milestone – you will be asked to resubmit only the content being request.Roles and Responsibilities. Remember, the psychologist/evaluator is not the only role/party involved. Don’t forget about the client, attorney/retaining party, CPS, and other parties involved. Thoroughly explain all roles of all parties involved and expand on the responsibilities and ethical considerations for each. It’s strongly recommended that all parties be organized by section for clarity. For example, a level 1 subheader may be “roles and responsibilities” while a level 2 subheader may be “client role and responsibility”, “evaluator role and responsibility”, and “retaining party role and responsibility.”Ethical Considerations. Refrain from saying an assessment "is an ethical assessment" but instead describe specific standards of the ethics codes (Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct with 2016 Amendments; Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology). Be sure the ethical guidelines you are suggesting in line with those of a professional psychology association (for example: American Psychological Association Code of Ethics and/or Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology) and substantiate your claims with specific examples. Feel free to use both ethical codes of conduct to enrich your discussion, but ensure that the code you are discussing are relevant to testing/assessment. Additionally, please do not simply list the name of the code without explaining what it is and why it is relevant. Paradoxically, do not describe the standard without listing the name and code. Make sure to clearly designate your sections with APA formatted subheaders (i.e. “Risk Assessment”; “Ethical Considerations”).Discuss the ethics pertaining to risk assessment such as mandated reporting, privacy/confidentiality/privilege, scoring and interpretation, practicing within the field of expertise/competence, use of appropriate methods/selection and use of appropriate assessment procedures, provision of assessment feedback, use of multiple sources of information, opinions of persons not being examined, focus on legally relevant factors, avoid causing harm to clients, impartiality, cooperating with other professionals, third party requests/involvement, etc.Risk Assessment(s). Risk assessments involve assessing for risk via statistics (actuarial), static factors (historic), and/or dynamic factors (current situational factors). Typical risk assessments involve suicide risk, violence/homicide risk, risk of victimization, risk for recidivism, etc. For this Milestone, you should be specifically talking about risk assessment (all the risk assessments administered for your chosen case study, beyond the one that was discussed in PSY 622) and expanding much more on the risk assessment testing used for this case: such as adding information on validity and reliability, reasons the assessment is classified as a risk assessment, why this type of risk assessment is appropriate for your chosen client, what type of risk the assessment is assessing (prediction v. correlation), and other test properties (norms, time to administer, qualification level of the administrator/who can give the test, what the test measures - scales/subscales, etc.). Also don’t forget to include the client results/data from the risk assessment in this section.Remember, this is an evaluation – client data/results must be included. Examples of risk assessments that may actually be included in your case or are recommendations of tests to include in your case include the following: CAPI (child abuse risk), SARA (spousal abuse/assault risk). Examples of tests that were not included in the original vignettes, but could be expanded on/recommended for your client include the following: Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) and Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD), Historical, Clinical, Risk Management-20 (HCR-20), and assessment of risk of suicide, violence, or recidivism via Clinical Interview. If you are confused about what tests in your case study are risk assessments, be sure to check out the Week 2 Announcement “Guide to Milestones.”IMPORTANT: The MMPI, SA-45, PAI, and other assessments are psychological assessments, not risk assessments, and will be discussed in Milestone Two. See more information below about describing assessments in a manner that is consistent with clinical assessment of risk. Daubert Standard. With regard to the risk assessment, you will discuss risk assessment/testing and how the selected risk assessment(s) must meet Daubert Standard (discuss validity/reliability for the test, for example). Writing “this assessment meets the Daubert Standard”, but failing to explain why it meets the standard, is insufficient for this assignment.Classic and Contemporary Theories. You will be applying psychological theories of risk assessment to your explanation. Remember, the theories must pertain specifically to risk assessment/testing – not psychological assessment in general. Classic and contemporary theories must pertain to the tests used, but also may include broader theories that pertain to risk assessment in general: such as static and dynamic risk factors and other theories of risk that pertain to your client and the type of test you are discussing. For example: discussing psychoanalytic theory would not be relevant to testing/assessment for risk, but would be a relevant theory to discuss for a future milestone (treatment), unless you are discussing the ego versus the id and the role of disinihibition (id) in increased risk. Risk typology (for example: beta risk) can be discussed as a contemporary theory, but be sure to discuss multiple classic/contemporary theories that are relevant to show good understanding of theoretical foundations. One mistake students often make is identifying one theory, but not another. For example, describing a classic theory but not a contemporary one.APA Formatting. Make sure to post in double-spacing with current APA formatting. As always, all formal papers must have a properly formatted title page and references page. While this is addressed in the course expectations, do your best to refrain from using direct quotes and instead use paraphrasing to put content into your own words. If you find that you must cite a direct quote, the quote location has to be included in the in-text citation. This is discussed in the helpful formatting/APA style document I created for my students, which can be found in the Week 1 announcements (the Credible Hulk). As a friendly reminder, please use headers/subheaders to organize academic content. Feel free to use Level 2 subheaders to further organize content. It’s strongly recommended that content be organized by section (Section III and V, for example) and further organized by rubric section (to ensure that all rubric grading sections are included). Be sure to cite all content that is not your own original idea/discovery, including school content (vignettes/case studies). It's best practice to include in-text citations in all paragraphs that contain content that is not your own original idea/discovery. Please do not use citation generators of any kind, as they show up like this on Brightspace [CITATION Dra09 \l 1033]. Instead, be sure to continue to learn how to cite properly using the manual (and not a generator) as they are sometimes inaccurate and impossible to read on SNHU's learning management system. Failing to have content identified and in the correct sections may constitute for missed points. This paper is 2-3 pages of only the content addressed (not including title page or references page).DESCRIBING ASSESSMENT RESULTS: Always start off by talking about the validity scales first because a test is either valid or invalid and, if the test is invalid, then explain what reasons (Ms. Z's test results were unable to be interpreted due to the clinically significant elevation of one or more validity scales (L Scale; F = 78) indicating that the client attempted to present herself in a favorable light. Try to refrain from describing the validity scales as "faking good" or "defensiveness" because the true names for the scales are L and K scales. In the description, you can say that the individual presented with elevated defensiveness, which affects the interpretation of overall scores. When describing tests results, describe what validity and clinical scales had elevations (score reported was higher than a T Score of 65, for example). If all scales are within normal limits for the case you are choosing to use, you would indicated that none of the described clinical scales were in the clinically significant range for pathology. If you did describe a clinical scale, you would say, Ms. Z scored in the clinically significant range on the depression scale (T=78).Remember, nearly all psychological assessments with the exception of forensic and neuropsychological testing are patient self-report. Therefore, the results may not match collateral history. For example, Mr. X scores within normal limits on the psychopathic deviate scale (Pd, T score = 65), but has a history of history of legal dysfunction as evidenced by multiple instances of police contact involving violence against others (intimate partner violence), notable criminal offenses (charges and/or convictions) including violent offenses, drug possession and sales, history of incarceration, forcing another to consume/ingest/become under the influence of drugs with the purpose of sexual intercourse, and lying. Symptoms are not due to symptoms associated with a psychotic disorder (hallucinations or delusions) or another primary mental illness. These symptoms would suggest that the client meets criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder despite the PD score being within normal limits. Lastly, make sure you describe what type of assessments you are qualified to administer (Qualification Level B and/or C) depending on the credentials you present yourself as having in these documents (can be fictitious credentials).Still feeling stuck? Feel free to review the examples provided in the Week 1 email full of helpful past student examples and – of course – reach out to me. Have an excellent week, dear students! I know that this is a lot of information, but the purpose of being clear and descriptive is to reduce anxiety/stress associated with the unknown and provided better direction for what is expected. Last, but not least: be sure to take some time for self-care, family, and friends!Yours in Learning, Dr. Holtgrave
PSY 3738 Rasmussen College Social Media Theory And Schema Paper
Deliverable 2 - Social Media Theory and SchemaCompetencyEvaluate psychological theories and their insights into the widely ...
PSY 3738 Rasmussen College Social Media Theory And Schema Paper
Deliverable 2 - Social Media Theory and SchemaCompetencyEvaluate psychological theories and their insights into the widely varying opinions and attitudes that are expressed through social media.InstructionsWe have been looking at different psychological theories and the way we can use them to better examine social media. For this assignment, you should choose yourself or another person (such as a celebrity or a politician). Spend some time looking through your/their social media accounts: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, etc. Then write your analysis, being sure to cover these points:A good introduction including who your subject is and a good overview of them and their social media useExamples and discussion of schema/script theory in your subjectExamples and discussion of cultivation theory in your subjectExamples and discussion of agenda-setting theory in your subjectExamples and discussion of social learning in your subjectExamples and discussion of uses and gratifications theory in your subjectConclusionsGrading RubricFFCBA01234Not SubmittedNo PassCompetenceProficiencyMasteryNot SubmittedFailed to provide a general introductionGave a bit of introduction, but you need to provide more details or make other corrections as described by the feedback you are receiving.Gave a good, basic introduction.Gave a strong, in-depth introduction.Not SubmittedFailed to provide examples and discussion of schemas / script theory.Briefly mentioned examples and discussion of schemas / script theory., but you need to provide more details or make other corrections as described by the feedback you are receiving.Gave several examples of schemas / script theory and considered in some depth.Gave several good examples of schemas / script theory and an insightful analysis of impact.Not SubmittedFailed to provide examples and discussion of cultivation theoryBriefly mentioned examples and discussion of cultivation theory, but you need to provide more details or make other corrections as described by the feedback you are receiving.Gave several examples of cultivation theory and considered in some depth.Gave several good examples of cultivation theory and an insightful analysis of impact.Not SubmittedFailed to provide examples and discussion of agenda setting theoryBriefly mentioned examples and discussion of agenda setting theory. but you need to provide more details or make other corrections as described by the feedback you are receiving.Gave several examples of agenda setting theory and considered in some depth.Gave several good examples of agenda setting theory and an insightful analysis of impact.Not SubmittedFailed to provide examples and discussion of social learning theoryBriefly mentioned examples and discussion of social learning theory, but you need to provide more details or make other corrections as described by the feedback you are receiving.Gave several examples of social learning theory and considered in some depth.Gave several good examples of social learning theory and an insightful analysis of impact.Not SubmittedFailed to provide examples and discussion of uses and gratifications theoryBriefly mentioned examples and discussion of uses and gratifications theory, but you need to provide more details or make other corrections as described by the feedback you are receiving.Gave several examples of uses and gratifications theory and considered in some depth.Gave several good examples of uses and gratifications theory and an insightful analysis of impact.Not SubmittedFailed to give a conclusionGave a bit of conclusion, but you need to provide more details or make other corrections as described by the feedback you are receiving.Gave a basic conclusionGave a thorough, insightful conclusion.
Similar Content
ENGL 1101 Augusta Technical College Mediation Essay
ENGL 1101 (Lutz)
Graded Essay Standards
•
•
•
•
All essays must contain at least 5 total paragraphs (intro, 3 bo...
smoking causes cancer, philosophy question help
It is often claimed that smoking causes cancer. This is usually presented as a reason why people should either give up smo...
Social Science Professional Conduct Discussion
You will find the documentaries online1. Write an essay in which you discuss the lessons learned in the following document...
Henderson State University Chapter 9 Summary Anthropology Essay
You will summarize and discuss the reading for Chapter 8 (starting on pg 189). The reading reflection should be a page or ...
Arizona State University Cultural Hybridity and The Agricultural Revolution Essay
Help with answering 2 questions!1 The principal goal of our course is to appreciate contact and encounter between societie...
What is Foundations of Mythology?, philosophy homework help
Write a 600- to 875-word paper, in which you answer the following questions:How is the word myth used popularly? For examp...
Edict Of Milan
The Edict of Milan was a document issued by Emperor Constantine the Great that proclaimed The document was directed to a w...
History Questions Final
The federal government used different approaches towards the plain Indian. First the federal government tried to fix triba...
Political
What is the problem of collective action? Give a precise definition. Give theoretical and real-life examples. Outline some...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
Synthesis Paper – Leadership Style
Synthesis is the act of creating something new from multiple existing entities. Synthesis of research, then, is creating a ...
Synthesis Paper – Leadership Style
Synthesis is the act of creating something new from multiple existing entities. Synthesis of research, then, is creating a new idea from existing ideas. It is a process developed through time and practice. In this assignment, you will apply the synthesis process to the course journal readings and your selected readings. As you synthesize, consider how leadership style influences leadership practice and results. For example, leadership style effects followers through the choice of public vs. private engagement or the use of public praise vs. active coaching. In some cases, what a leader does not say or do can have a significant effect on both the sense of value and the motivation of group members.General Requirements:Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Refer to the annotated bibliography and outline you created in the Module 2 assignment along with the assignment feedback from your instructor.
Locate at least two additional, topically-related, empirical articles. Use "Empirical Research Checklist" to guide your selection.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:Locate the annotated bibliography and outline you created in the Module 2 assignment. Using the outline you developed, the information from the annotated bibliography, and the feedback provided by your instructor, write a paper (2,000-2,250 words) that synthesizes three of the articles assigned in the first two modules of this course with the two (or more) topically-related, empirical articles you selected. Do that by including the following:
A statement of at least three common themes addressed in all of the articles.
A statement of the conclusions that can be drawn when the articles are taken together as a single entity. What is the overall message of the group of articles? Focus specifically on the connection between leadership style and leadership theory in areas such as individual identity, culture, and worldview. What are the potential effects of these and other individual leadership characteristics and style; how do they influence the methods leaders choose to guide groups or organizations?Attached below are the articles. Once the assignment is posted, I will add the teacher comments and etc that is mentioned in the information above.
Philosophy on Primal Religions Paper
Requirements:1- Each answer must have 250 words or more 2- You must read the article BEFORE answering. Do not copy anyth ...
Philosophy on Primal Religions Paper
Requirements:1- Each answer must have 250 words or more 2- You must read the article BEFORE answering. Do not copy anything from the internet. They must be YOUR Own Thoughts.4- Do not cite too much. With one or two citations is enough. Note: Do not use outside resources besides the one that I give you. EACH ANSWER HAVE THEIR OWN book.5- Read the articles.6- critical thinking. Please1- In what sense are primal religions primal?Resource: Huston Smith: The world Religion “ the primal religion”2- What is Pals’ reservation about explaining religion using an “aggressively reductionist functionalism”? Which theorists are supposed to fall under that description? Resource Daniel l pals : eight theories of religion: Society as sacred: Emile Durkheim3- Though Smith warns against romanticizing the primal religions, it is hard to see that he has avoided the tendency. Yes or no? What is it about primal religion that so much draws his admiration?Resource: Huston Smith: The world Religion “ the primal religion”4- Armstrong describes two versions of the Flood Myth – from the Artrahasis and the Gilgamesh. How do you explain the differences she describes? In particular, how would you describe the implicit contrast with the Flood Myth as it appears in Genesis? Resource Karen Armstrong: A short history of myth “ the early civilization”5- Importantly, Smith claims that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are each “historical” religions, in a way that Hinduism and Buddhism are not. What does he have in mind by “historical” if the idea is supposed to distinguish the Eastern and Western Religious traditions?Resource: Huston Smith: The world Religion “ judaism ”6- Very often Christians will read backwards from Christianity to Judaism, and when they do that they usually light onto the idea of “Messiah”. How close is the Judaic idea of Messiah to the idea as it later is used by Christians? If there is more than one idea of ‘Messiah’ or ‘Messianic Ideal’ around, how are they distinguished from one another? Resource: Huston Smith: The world Religion “ judaism ”7- One idea of Judaism that regularly draws fire is the idea of a “chosen people”. Why is that such a hot-button? Smith is anxious to interpret that idea in a way that defuses it? How does he try to do that, and how successful would you say he is?Resource: Huston Smith: The world Religion “ judaism ”
4 pages
Latin America Security Issues Final Finaal
Which of the definitions of security are most relevant to the nations in Latin America? How Ideally, security when defined ...
Latin America Security Issues Final Finaal
Which of the definitions of security are most relevant to the nations in Latin America? How Ideally, security when defined represents a ...
Valdosta State University Literature Comparison Discussion
Write an essay of at least 1000 words,MLA formatting Select any two (2) works from Unit 2 and/or Unit 3, and compare them ...
Valdosta State University Literature Comparison Discussion
Write an essay of at least 1000 words,MLA formatting Select any two (2) works from Unit 2 and/or Unit 3, and compare them through the selected works’ genre(s), such as travel literature, essay, drama, novel, and/or satire. Consider how the form and the content inform each other in each work. (You are only selecting 2 works.)use Johnathan Swift " A modest proposal for Unit 2, and Matsua Basho Unit 3 https://youtu.be/90-2Dg2CJdw
PSY 626 SNHU Applying Feedback and Expanding Your Case Research Report
Attached is the rubric and apa 7 format guidelines also an example of how the milestone one is suppose to look like is att ...
PSY 626 SNHU Applying Feedback and Expanding Your Case Research Report
Attached is the rubric and apa 7 format guidelines also an example of how the milestone one is suppose to look like is attached as well. Attached is also the PSY 622(Interview journal screening one) screening please edit and change anything that needs to be changed there was no feedback on it except a good job done. Please follow this teachers rubric and example to fix the paper/write it based on the PSY 622 screening. Also Milestone one from PSY 622 is attached. The correct APA 6th edition citation for your course textbook is as follows: Skeem, J. L., Douglas, K. S., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (Eds.). (2009). Science in the courtroom: Consensus and controversy. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. The matching in-text citation would read (Skeem, Douglas, & Lilienfeld, 2009).Week 2 Announcement: Assignment RemindersMilestone OneThis week your first milestone assignment is due (“Applying Feedback and Expanding Your Case Report”). Components of your paper that should have already been completed at the most basic level in PSY622 include the following: Client Capacity (Daubert Standard, Interview Information, Collateral Information, Recommendations, Ethical Standards), Risk Assessment (Daubert, Interview Information, Collateral Information, Recommendations, Ethical Guidelines). Given that you have ethical standards in the PSY 622 case report, you will be substantially expanding on these sections. Remember, this is a completely different class from 622 and these assignments should be treated as new assignments, using only the basic content from the 622 Case Report as a framework to build on in this class. There is no exact way to complete these milestones, so feel free to be creative and also use the milestone examples sent via email in Week 1 if you are feeling stuck on what kind of content to include. Remember, it’s a good idea to model your sections after the rubric to ensure that you have included all sections (the theories section, for example, is sometimes forgotten in student submissions).Also as a reminder, ONLY include the sections being requested for this assignment (risk assessment; Daubert Standard as it applies to risk assessment; ethical considerations). You can include information from the interview if it is relevant to this milestone topic (risk assessment). o Please, do not submit your entire case report or you will be asked to resubmit the assignment that addresses the content due for only the milestone being requested. When working on your risk assessment section, do not include “recommendations” or other content that does not pertain to risk (such as general psychological assessment, therapy/interventions, etc.), because the rubric is not addressing these sections. Please do not submit a working copy of your final paper where you continually add sections to the final paper and submit as a milestone – you will be asked to resubmit only the content being request.Roles and Responsibilities. Remember, the psychologist/evaluator is not the only role/party involved. Don’t forget about the client, attorney/retaining party, CPS, and other parties involved. Thoroughly explain all roles of all parties involved and expand on the responsibilities and ethical considerations for each. It’s strongly recommended that all parties be organized by section for clarity. For example, a level 1 subheader may be “roles and responsibilities” while a level 2 subheader may be “client role and responsibility”, “evaluator role and responsibility”, and “retaining party role and responsibility.”Ethical Considerations. Refrain from saying an assessment "is an ethical assessment" but instead describe specific standards of the ethics codes (Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct with 2016 Amendments; Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology). Be sure the ethical guidelines you are suggesting in line with those of a professional psychology association (for example: American Psychological Association Code of Ethics and/or Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology) and substantiate your claims with specific examples. Feel free to use both ethical codes of conduct to enrich your discussion, but ensure that the code you are discussing are relevant to testing/assessment. Additionally, please do not simply list the name of the code without explaining what it is and why it is relevant. Paradoxically, do not describe the standard without listing the name and code. Make sure to clearly designate your sections with APA formatted subheaders (i.e. “Risk Assessment”; “Ethical Considerations”).Discuss the ethics pertaining to risk assessment such as mandated reporting, privacy/confidentiality/privilege, scoring and interpretation, practicing within the field of expertise/competence, use of appropriate methods/selection and use of appropriate assessment procedures, provision of assessment feedback, use of multiple sources of information, opinions of persons not being examined, focus on legally relevant factors, avoid causing harm to clients, impartiality, cooperating with other professionals, third party requests/involvement, etc.Risk Assessment(s). Risk assessments involve assessing for risk via statistics (actuarial), static factors (historic), and/or dynamic factors (current situational factors). Typical risk assessments involve suicide risk, violence/homicide risk, risk of victimization, risk for recidivism, etc. For this Milestone, you should be specifically talking about risk assessment (all the risk assessments administered for your chosen case study, beyond the one that was discussed in PSY 622) and expanding much more on the risk assessment testing used for this case: such as adding information on validity and reliability, reasons the assessment is classified as a risk assessment, why this type of risk assessment is appropriate for your chosen client, what type of risk the assessment is assessing (prediction v. correlation), and other test properties (norms, time to administer, qualification level of the administrator/who can give the test, what the test measures - scales/subscales, etc.). Also don’t forget to include the client results/data from the risk assessment in this section.Remember, this is an evaluation – client data/results must be included. Examples of risk assessments that may actually be included in your case or are recommendations of tests to include in your case include the following: CAPI (child abuse risk), SARA (spousal abuse/assault risk). Examples of tests that were not included in the original vignettes, but could be expanded on/recommended for your client include the following: Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) and Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD), Historical, Clinical, Risk Management-20 (HCR-20), and assessment of risk of suicide, violence, or recidivism via Clinical Interview. If you are confused about what tests in your case study are risk assessments, be sure to check out the Week 2 Announcement “Guide to Milestones.”IMPORTANT: The MMPI, SA-45, PAI, and other assessments are psychological assessments, not risk assessments, and will be discussed in Milestone Two. See more information below about describing assessments in a manner that is consistent with clinical assessment of risk. Daubert Standard. With regard to the risk assessment, you will discuss risk assessment/testing and how the selected risk assessment(s) must meet Daubert Standard (discuss validity/reliability for the test, for example). Writing “this assessment meets the Daubert Standard”, but failing to explain why it meets the standard, is insufficient for this assignment.Classic and Contemporary Theories. You will be applying psychological theories of risk assessment to your explanation. Remember, the theories must pertain specifically to risk assessment/testing – not psychological assessment in general. Classic and contemporary theories must pertain to the tests used, but also may include broader theories that pertain to risk assessment in general: such as static and dynamic risk factors and other theories of risk that pertain to your client and the type of test you are discussing. For example: discussing psychoanalytic theory would not be relevant to testing/assessment for risk, but would be a relevant theory to discuss for a future milestone (treatment), unless you are discussing the ego versus the id and the role of disinihibition (id) in increased risk. Risk typology (for example: beta risk) can be discussed as a contemporary theory, but be sure to discuss multiple classic/contemporary theories that are relevant to show good understanding of theoretical foundations. One mistake students often make is identifying one theory, but not another. For example, describing a classic theory but not a contemporary one.APA Formatting. Make sure to post in double-spacing with current APA formatting. As always, all formal papers must have a properly formatted title page and references page. While this is addressed in the course expectations, do your best to refrain from using direct quotes and instead use paraphrasing to put content into your own words. If you find that you must cite a direct quote, the quote location has to be included in the in-text citation. This is discussed in the helpful formatting/APA style document I created for my students, which can be found in the Week 1 announcements (the Credible Hulk). As a friendly reminder, please use headers/subheaders to organize academic content. Feel free to use Level 2 subheaders to further organize content. It’s strongly recommended that content be organized by section (Section III and V, for example) and further organized by rubric section (to ensure that all rubric grading sections are included). Be sure to cite all content that is not your own original idea/discovery, including school content (vignettes/case studies). It's best practice to include in-text citations in all paragraphs that contain content that is not your own original idea/discovery. Please do not use citation generators of any kind, as they show up like this on Brightspace [CITATION Dra09 \l 1033]. Instead, be sure to continue to learn how to cite properly using the manual (and not a generator) as they are sometimes inaccurate and impossible to read on SNHU's learning management system. Failing to have content identified and in the correct sections may constitute for missed points. This paper is 2-3 pages of only the content addressed (not including title page or references page).DESCRIBING ASSESSMENT RESULTS: Always start off by talking about the validity scales first because a test is either valid or invalid and, if the test is invalid, then explain what reasons (Ms. Z's test results were unable to be interpreted due to the clinically significant elevation of one or more validity scales (L Scale; F = 78) indicating that the client attempted to present herself in a favorable light. Try to refrain from describing the validity scales as "faking good" or "defensiveness" because the true names for the scales are L and K scales. In the description, you can say that the individual presented with elevated defensiveness, which affects the interpretation of overall scores. When describing tests results, describe what validity and clinical scales had elevations (score reported was higher than a T Score of 65, for example). If all scales are within normal limits for the case you are choosing to use, you would indicated that none of the described clinical scales were in the clinically significant range for pathology. If you did describe a clinical scale, you would say, Ms. Z scored in the clinically significant range on the depression scale (T=78).Remember, nearly all psychological assessments with the exception of forensic and neuropsychological testing are patient self-report. Therefore, the results may not match collateral history. For example, Mr. X scores within normal limits on the psychopathic deviate scale (Pd, T score = 65), but has a history of history of legal dysfunction as evidenced by multiple instances of police contact involving violence against others (intimate partner violence), notable criminal offenses (charges and/or convictions) including violent offenses, drug possession and sales, history of incarceration, forcing another to consume/ingest/become under the influence of drugs with the purpose of sexual intercourse, and lying. Symptoms are not due to symptoms associated with a psychotic disorder (hallucinations or delusions) or another primary mental illness. These symptoms would suggest that the client meets criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder despite the PD score being within normal limits. Lastly, make sure you describe what type of assessments you are qualified to administer (Qualification Level B and/or C) depending on the credentials you present yourself as having in these documents (can be fictitious credentials).Still feeling stuck? Feel free to review the examples provided in the Week 1 email full of helpful past student examples and – of course – reach out to me. Have an excellent week, dear students! I know that this is a lot of information, but the purpose of being clear and descriptive is to reduce anxiety/stress associated with the unknown and provided better direction for what is expected. Last, but not least: be sure to take some time for self-care, family, and friends!Yours in Learning, Dr. Holtgrave
PSY 3738 Rasmussen College Social Media Theory And Schema Paper
Deliverable 2 - Social Media Theory and SchemaCompetencyEvaluate psychological theories and their insights into the widely ...
PSY 3738 Rasmussen College Social Media Theory And Schema Paper
Deliverable 2 - Social Media Theory and SchemaCompetencyEvaluate psychological theories and their insights into the widely varying opinions and attitudes that are expressed through social media.InstructionsWe have been looking at different psychological theories and the way we can use them to better examine social media. For this assignment, you should choose yourself or another person (such as a celebrity or a politician). Spend some time looking through your/their social media accounts: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, etc. Then write your analysis, being sure to cover these points:A good introduction including who your subject is and a good overview of them and their social media useExamples and discussion of schema/script theory in your subjectExamples and discussion of cultivation theory in your subjectExamples and discussion of agenda-setting theory in your subjectExamples and discussion of social learning in your subjectExamples and discussion of uses and gratifications theory in your subjectConclusionsGrading RubricFFCBA01234Not SubmittedNo PassCompetenceProficiencyMasteryNot SubmittedFailed to provide a general introductionGave a bit of introduction, but you need to provide more details or make other corrections as described by the feedback you are receiving.Gave a good, basic introduction.Gave a strong, in-depth introduction.Not SubmittedFailed to provide examples and discussion of schemas / script theory.Briefly mentioned examples and discussion of schemas / script theory., but you need to provide more details or make other corrections as described by the feedback you are receiving.Gave several examples of schemas / script theory and considered in some depth.Gave several good examples of schemas / script theory and an insightful analysis of impact.Not SubmittedFailed to provide examples and discussion of cultivation theoryBriefly mentioned examples and discussion of cultivation theory, but you need to provide more details or make other corrections as described by the feedback you are receiving.Gave several examples of cultivation theory and considered in some depth.Gave several good examples of cultivation theory and an insightful analysis of impact.Not SubmittedFailed to provide examples and discussion of agenda setting theoryBriefly mentioned examples and discussion of agenda setting theory. but you need to provide more details or make other corrections as described by the feedback you are receiving.Gave several examples of agenda setting theory and considered in some depth.Gave several good examples of agenda setting theory and an insightful analysis of impact.Not SubmittedFailed to provide examples and discussion of social learning theoryBriefly mentioned examples and discussion of social learning theory, but you need to provide more details or make other corrections as described by the feedback you are receiving.Gave several examples of social learning theory and considered in some depth.Gave several good examples of social learning theory and an insightful analysis of impact.Not SubmittedFailed to provide examples and discussion of uses and gratifications theoryBriefly mentioned examples and discussion of uses and gratifications theory, but you need to provide more details or make other corrections as described by the feedback you are receiving.Gave several examples of uses and gratifications theory and considered in some depth.Gave several good examples of uses and gratifications theory and an insightful analysis of impact.Not SubmittedFailed to give a conclusionGave a bit of conclusion, but you need to provide more details or make other corrections as described by the feedback you are receiving.Gave a basic conclusionGave a thorough, insightful conclusion.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents