discussion questions

User Generated

Wbrzbr

Other

Description

1. "Interviewing and Interrogating" Please respond to the following:

  • Determine the fundamental difference between interrogating and interviewing under the circumstance of criminal investigation. Provide one (1) example of a situation or scenario when each of these would be used.

  • * From the e-Activity, and based on Figure 7.5 Linear Use-of-force Continuum in Chapter 7 of the textbook, support or critique the argument that a police officer should use an Electronic Countermeasures (ECM) and / or taser before the utilization of deadly force when making arrests. Provide a rationale to support your response.
  • View the video below and respond to the questions on the video.

2. "White-Collar Crimes Do Hurt" Please respond to the following:

  • Suggest three (3) key elements of identifying white-collar crimes. Next, determine at least two (2) federal criminal statutes that government agencies commonly use to convict white-collar criminals then specify two (2) main reasons why government agencies commonly use the statutes in question. Justify your response.
  • Review three (3) types of costs (i.e., financial, physical, and social) that result from white-collar crime. Next, debate which costs you believe result in the greatest loss to society. Provide support for your response.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hi, please find the attached

1

Running Head: WHITE COLLAR CRIME

White Collar Crime

Name of Institution

Student Name

Lecturer

Date

WHITE COLLAR CRIME

2

Interrogating versus Interviewing in Criminal Investigation
During a criminal investigation, there are two procedures that have to take place; people
have to be interviewed, while others have to be interrogated. When it comes to interviewing,
this is the non-accusatory procedure whereby a person, such as a witness, victim or even a
suspect (Levensen, 2016). These are asked non-accusatory questions whereby the whole
procedure is conducted outside the lock. The aim of an interview in an investigation
circumstance is to try and elicit any behavioral responses from the interviewee. The interview
may be used to find out what happened and if they were involved in any way (Peterson,
2012).
It is a way to for the investigator to maintain a neutral ground so as to identify if the
interviewee exhibits indicators of deception or even if they are lying. The investigator must
not become accusatory as they may lead to the victim, suspect or witness relenting to forward
crucial information that may give a lead to the investigation. This is a chance where most of
the talking should be given to the interviewee as the investigator talks for just about 20% of
the conversation (Peterson, 2012). The process involves keeping the questions succinct,
without letting the interviewee learn much about the investigation. It is all based on evoking
emotions and leads without any prior accusations. A good example is where a person
witnesses a murder but he or she is too scared to identify t...


Anonymous
This is great! Exactly what I wanted.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags