Description
Question:Discuss Aristotle’s function argument.
following the requirement and read the documents, I provided the example how to write this short-paper and what I did my draft 1, but my own is not good. So I need you help me write a new one. My professor comment my essay:" There are several significant issues with this paper. There isn't a dedicated presentation of the function argument. What are the claims/premises, and how do they lead to the conclusion? Some of the general ideas appear in this paper, but we need a careful step-by-step reconstruction of the argument. The paper does not technically complete the assignment because it is lacking in a presentation an objection to the function argument. As such, the paper cannot receive a passing grade. There are also serious issues with the writing, so we should discuss whether this course is the right fit for you.”
.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
Done. Let me know incase of anything.
Running Head: Aristoles Function Argument
Aristoles Function Argument
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Running Head: Aristoles Function Argument
Eudaimonia is a human good that everyone needs to have in life and action. It entails happiness,
flourishing and well-being, but many people often don’t agree about what it entails. Aristole
argues that a clearer view of happiness can be arrived at by first ascertaining the ergo of an
individual. The argument involves an explanation of how people achieve good life. He justifies
that good resides in the function for all things that have a function. The function argument
involves the claim that all things entail a nature that is functional in regards to their kind. It can
be explained that clothes can be referred to as clothes because they can be worn by people,
restaurants can be determined as restaurant be...