Samuel becomes frustrated with his boat and yells I will sell my boat to anyone for $5. John says I accept and takes $5 out of his wallet. Does a contract exist? Group of answer choicesNo, the offer was not made with serious objective intentYes, because the offer was communicated to offereeYes, the terms are reasonably certainYes, the Freedom to Contract policy would applyFlag this QuestionQuestion 20.8 ptsYour grandma promises you a gift of $100 for your birthday.Later, she decides she doesn't want to give you the money. Is this a breach of a contract?Group of answer choicesYes, she promised you, so she must follow throughYes, gifts are always contractsYes, grandmas have to give grandchildren gifts of $100 on their birthdayNo, gifts are not contractsFlag this QuestionQuestion 30.8 ptsAn acceptance in the case of a unilateral contract requires?Group of answer choicesPromise as acceptanceReturn promiseComplete perrformanceWritten acceptanceFlag this QuestionQuestion 40.8 ptsIf both parties are merchants, then additional terms automatically become part of the contract under the UCC unless what? Group of answer choicesThe offeror rejects the additional termsThe additional terms are considered to "materially alter" the contractThe orginal offer prohibited additional termsAll of the choices listed would prevent an additional term from becoming part of a contract under the UCCFlag this QuestionQuestion 50.8 ptsA(n) _______ is valid as soon as it is put in the mail?Group of answer choicesConsiderationOfferAcceptanceRevocationMike, who is 16 years old, bets his father $100 that he will abstain from drinking until he is 21. State law prohibits drinking of alcohol by anyone under age 21. Mike does not drink alcohol until age 21. Is his father liable to pay him? Group of answer choicesNo, due to illegality of underage drinkingNo, his father provided no considerationNo, Mike is a minorNo, It is illegal for Mike to drink AND his father gave no considerationFlag this QuestionQuestion 20.8 ptsA sober student offers his very drunk friend $20 for his laptop. The extremely drunk student says "Okay, just come over tomorrow." Which of the following statements is true?Group of answer choicesThe contract is void.There is a contract, but only if a third party was present.Drunk people cannot form contracts.The contract is voidable at the option of the intoxicated person.Flag this QuestionQuestion 30.8 ptsJames is 16 years old and wants to purchase a cell phone plan without his parents knowledge. He signs the contract, and then realizes he can't afford it. This contract isGroup of answer choicesVoidVoidableFully enforceableUneforceableFlag this QuestionQuestion 40.8 ptsIn terms of value of consideration, courts are not interested in the significance of the value of consideration unless it is but aGroup of answer choicesWritten contractPromisePeppercornNovationFlag this QuestionQuestion 50.8 ptsWhat agreements are enforceable without additional consideration?Group of answer choicesIf one foresee's the event that would cause the contract to changeIf there is no detriment that occuredTwo parties of a contract governed by the UCC may modify the terms of the contract without providing new consideration.If there is no promise to pay for past debtWhich of the following is an example of duress?Group of answer choicesJoe tells Bob to enter his contract or else they're no longer friendsJoe tells Bob to enter his contract or else he will smash Bob's pictureJoe tells Bob to enter his contract or else he will kill himJoe tells Bob to enter his contract or else he will punch him in one weekFlag this QuestionQuestion 20.8 ptsAn old man is selling a car you are interested in, he states the car has 57,000 miles on it. The car actually had 157,000 miles on it. The man selling the car did not know of this since he had bought it from a previous owner did not tell him of the additional 100,000 miles. What is this an example of?Group of answer choicesInnocent misrepresentation.Unilateral mistakeDuressFraudulent misrepresentationFlag this QuestionQuestion 30.8 ptsWhy does undue influence make a contract voidable?Group of answer choicesBecause expert advice tends to be made upBecause influencing someone to do something is never legalBecause of the constitutional amendmentsBecause the unfairness of certain relationships results where one party has a great amount of influence may be able to overcome the other person's free willFlag this QuestionQuestion 40.8 ptsBilly is showing his old camper to a prospective buyer. Billy has had issues with the waste system in the camper in the past. When the buyer asks about the sanitary waste system in the camper Billy avoids the question and moves on. Does the buyer have a defense against contract enforcement?Group of answer choicesYes, misrepresentation may be used a defense against contract enforcementYes, but only if the buyer brought it up multiple timesNo, Billy is not required to provide the status of his machinery.No, because silence is not a way of making a misrepresentationFlag this QuestionQuestion 50.8 ptsWhich of the following is true in regards to a mistake of value?Group of answer choicesMistakes of value generally have no legal significance under contract lawA mistake of value occurs when a person buys a good and sell it for a higher priceA mistake of value occurs when a person is mistaken as to the legality of contract formationA mistake of value is always a valid defense against contract enforcementIn a contract that benefits a third party, who can sue to enforce the contract?Group of answer choicesIntended BeneficiaryBreaching partyIncidental BeneficiaryDelegatorFlag this QuestionQuestion 20.8 ptsWhen a contact is made for the express purpose of giving a gift to a third party, the third party can sue the promisor directly to enforce the promise. Which of the following best describes the third party in this situation?Group of answer choicesIntended beneficiaryDonee beneficiaryCreditor beneficiaryBoth an intended and donee beneficiaryFlag this QuestionQuestion 30.8 ptsWhat duties cannot be delegated?Group of answer choicesSome personal service contractsThose duties that the contract prohibits delegation forWhen the third party cannot perform to the level of delegatorAll of these answers are correctFlag this QuestionQuestion 40.8 ptsDino believes his company can fulfill an order of 3,000 handmade bracelets for a customer. His employees are all then accidentally killed in a fire so Dino won't be able to make the bracelets for his customers. Assume no other employees can be hired and trained in the necessary time frame. This is possibly an example of?Group of answer choicesDischarge by incompetenceDischarge by lawDischarge by alteration of contractDischarge by impossibility of performanceFlag this QuestionQuestion 50.8 ptsWhen a condition operates to terminate a party's absolute promise to perform once it is no longer met, it is called a(n)Group of answer choicesCondition PrecedentCondition SubsequentImplied ConditionConcurrent Condition

From the beginning of this course, you've learned how an integrative bargaining approach to a negotiation is preferable when the parties want to preserve a relationship. In our project scenario, Michelle wants to continue working at the call center, and more importantly wants to maintain the good working relationship that she has cultivated with her boss, Nikki. Neither party wants the schedule dispute to derail that relationship. Nikki knows that Michelle has started bad mouthing her to the other employees because she thinks that Nikki's approach to scheduling people based on seniority was a lazy rather than fair. Michelle's emotions were running high when she did this, but unfortunately the remarks started to damage Nikki's reputation as being a good supervisor. As a result, the relationship between the supervisor and employee is now strained.For this final part of the project you will address the following questions in your paper:Analyze and discuss the critical role of reputation, trust, and fairness as it pertains to this situation.After meeting and discussing the issue, the two women were able to work out a schedule for Michelle that would solve her daycare issues and would be fair to the other employees. Now that the issue has been resolved, based on your readings, synthesize a plan for how the two women can work towards rebuilding their relationship.In your paper, follow standard mechanics in grammar, punctuation, and spelling1-2 pages 

Part 1:Construct a 3 to 5-year strategic plan that is related to a specified health care organization of your choice. The organization may be not-for-profit or for-profit. Complete a SWOT analysis, and include the following:Internal strengths are related to resources and capabilities that effectively and efficiently allow an organization to accomplish its stated mission. Write out and discuss 8 to 10 strengths that you consider the highest priority for the organization of choice. Internal weaknesses are related to deficiencies in resources and capabilities that hinder an organization’s ability to accomplish its mandate or mission. Write out and discuss 8 to 10 weaknesses that you consider the highest priority for the organization of choice. External opportunities are outside factors or situations that can affect your organization in a favorable way. Write out and discuss 8 to 10 opportunities that you consider of highest priority for the organization of choice. External threats are outside factors or situations that can affect your organization in a negative way. Write out and discuss 8 to 10 threats that you consider of highest priority for the organization of choice.Part 2:In the health care industry, change occurs quickly and many times without warning. In an effort to address such changes, contingency planning is a key step in the strategic planning process. Contingency planning follows a 7-step process to achieve maximum effectiveness. Assume that you are formulating the contingency plans for an outpatient surgical center.Identify the 7 steps in the contingency planning process, and explain how each step will be addressed for the surgical center.Be sure to provide a properly cited response that includes references.