Conclusion.. 1 page paper

User Generated

oynmvalryyn

Humanities

Description

Just need conclusion paper. 1 page paper.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

PSY 211 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric Overview: For this milestone, you will articulate your final thoughts around your review of the literature and proposed research design. This milestone can be used as the final section of your Research Investigation final project submission. You will review the instructor feedback and incorporate into your final project submission in Module Eight. The final project is meant for you to propose a hypothetical study. You are not and should not be conducting human subjects research for this project. It is not necessary for the purposes of this assignment. All human subjects research requires written approval from the SNHU COCE Institutional Review Board in order to protect the welfare and ensure ethical treatment of the subjects. The following elements must be addressed as outlined in the Final Project Guidelines and Rubrics document: A. Explain why you believe the identified gap in the research should be explored in future research. B. Explain how the claims made by the authors of the studies presented in your chosen track would logically inform future research into your identified gap. C. Explain the benefit of the research you have proposed to the field of psychology. Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a one-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, oneinch margins. Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions. Critical Elements Conclusions: Explored Exemplary (100%) Meets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates keen insight into the importance of exploring gaps in research Proficient (85%) Explains why the gap in the research should be explored in future research Conclusions: Further Research Meets “Proficient” criteria and analysis demonstrates keen insight regarding how gaps in resources influence future research Explains how the claims made by the authors of the studies presented in the chosen track would logically inform future research into identified gap Needs Improvement (55%) Explains why the gap in the research should be addressed in future research, but explanation is cursory or illogical Explains how the claims made by the authors of the studies presented in the chosen track would logically inform future research into identified gap, but is cursory or illogical Not Evident (0%) Does not explain why the gap in the research should be addressed Does not explain how the claims made by the authors of the studies presented in the chosen track would logically inform future research into identified gap Value 30 30 Conclusions: Benefit Articulation of Response Meets “Proficient” criteria and explanation demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of the potential value of the proposed research to the field of psychology Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-toread format Explains the benefit of the research that has been proposed to the field of psychology Explains the benefit of the research that has been proposed to the field of psychology, but explanation is cursory or illogical Does not explain the benefit of the research that has been proposed to the field of psychology 30 Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100%
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: HIV Intervention Plan

1

Conclusion

It is crucial to understand that there exist programs that would get incorporated within
the intervention schemes to establish the relevance or importance of the intervention plan, or just
to determine the outcomes of the intervention as explained in Adimora et al., (2013). The
indicators act to show the level of accountability and performance of the programs. The research
identified some of these evaluation programs to determine the areas that still required attention
and how to raise awareness among teens ad young generations.

The implementation of evaluation required the assistance of several stakeholders in the
health sector, from physicians, medics, counselor...


Anonymous
I use Studypool every time I need help studying, and it never disappoints.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags