Purpose: To apply what you have learned in this course to a test case, considering what makes something a religion.Process:You will be placed in (or select) a group and use the group discussion board. The discussion will be focused on one or another movement that may or may not be considered a religion. Each of you will locate, read and view online resources (essays, videos) presenting alternative viewpoints and arguments (pro and con) regarding the status of that movement to help you determine is it is or is not a religion. Groups will discuss and debate the strengths and weaknesses of the arguments and then each group member will compose and post a summary of the group discussion. The best summary for each group may appear on the main class discussion board. Then you can read the summaries and conclusions the other groups came to about other debatable movements.Pay special attention to due dates for each part of the process: initial post due by..., replies due by..., summary post due by..., rating due by... (specific dates will be posted as an announcement in the course site and/or sent via email).Find your assigned group in the “group discussion” or “People” section of the course site, then choosing the "Is it a Religion (Links to an external site.)" tab at the top. Be sure to check the announcements in your group space for any group specific information. DirectionsStep 1: Research and initial postIndividually, each student is to seek out resources to familiarize themselves with the arguments on both sides of the debate:Use the internet and Googlesearch for < is ________ a religion > (fill in the blank with the movement you are assigned - do not use the < >)Identify and read(or view video/listen to audio) at least two sources:one pro (“yes, it is a religion”)one con (“no, it is not a religion”)may review more than one for each position and/or a more middle of the road (“it depends”) argumentConsider the reliability, credibility and authority of the author of the sources you read/view (an argument that sounds strong may be weak if the person who is making it does not really know what they are talking about – avoid uninformed bias and self-serving agendas. For instance, a Christian source might argue that Secular Humanism is a religion because they do not want it being taught in the public schools [religious worldviews cannot be taught in public schools])Come to your own conclusion, based on the sources you read/viewPost to your group discussion boardyour conclusion (answer to the question) and a summary of both the pro and con arguments from the sources you read/viewed, noting which arguments most helped you arrive at your conclusion and why. Be sure to include URL links (copy and paste from your browser address line) to the sources you are referencing so your group mates can check them out for themselves and make clear which of the sources are "pro" and which are "con".

A brief description of the government or non-profit organization you selected. Describe the ethical issue or violation you identified as it relates to finance or budgeting. Using the American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) Code of Ethics or the ethical guidelines within your organization and/or nation, explain why it is/was an ethical issue or violation. Then, explain how the organization is addressing or has addressed it. If a violation has not occurred, how would you recommend preventing one?Be sure to support your posting and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.ReadingsEskridge, R. D., French, P. E., & McThomas, M. (2012). The international city/county management association code of ethics. Public Integrity, 14(2), 127–150. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.Rossmann, D., & Shanahan, E. A. (2012). Defining and achieving normative democratic values in participatory budgeting processes. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 56–66. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.American Society for Public Administration. (2012). Proposed code of ethics. Retrieved from http://www.aspanet.org/public/ASPADocs/Principles%2012-09-10.pdfKavanagh, S., Ruggini, J., Na, M., Kinney, A., Kreklow, S., Greiner, J., & Stewart, A. (2006). Market research report: Budgeting technology solutions. Retrieved fromhttp://www.gfoa.org/sites/default/files/BudgetTechnologyReport.pdfNew York State Office of the Attorney General. (2010). Attorney General Cuomo expands investigation into “pension padding.” Retrieved from http://www.ag.ny.gov/press-release/attorney-general-cuomo-expands-investigation-pension-paddingU.S. Office of Government Ethics. (2011). Standards of ethical conduct for employees of the executive branch(pp. 1–23). Retrieved from http://www.oge.gov/Laws-and-Regulations/Employee-Standards-of-Conduct/Standards-of-Ethical-Conduct-for-Employees-of-the-Executive-Branch-(PDF)/MediaLaureate Education (Producer). (2008e). Vital factors in finance and budgeting: Ethics and technology[Video file]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu

The Case of Ruth to be utilized in applying a specific counseling theory. The theory is person centered therapy. Produce a PowerPoint, with a clinical summary of Ruth (chief compliant, psychosocial issues, diagnosis, medical and psychological history), an outline of the key principles and techniques of the theory and how the theory will be applied, and intervention recommendations.Note: Possible Clinical DiagnosisAdjustment DisorderPanic DisorderDysthymic DisorderIdentity ProblemUse the DSM-V and format.Clinical Diagnosis.Medical Condition(s). Psychosocial IssuesRequirements: Must include the following:Clincal SummaryChief ComplaintBackgroundPsychosocial issuesMedical IssuesPsychological IssuesTherapy Key PrinciplesThe key principles or conceptsTechniques usedRole of the therapistApplicationHow the therapy was applied to Ruth's chief complaintsThe techniques usedRecommendations for working with Ruth using the therapySlides were organized with headers. Font was legible. No grammatical errors. Citations and references included in APA format.The book used is the Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. (10th ed.) by Griffin Corey. Attached is the Case of Ruth.