Societys Response to Crime essay no plagiarism

User Generated

WFGRIRAF

Humanities

Description

Assignment 1: LASA 2 Society’s Response to Crime

Society’s response to crime has changed over the past century. The approach of rehabilitation in the 1960s has gradually been replaced with a “get tough on crime” approach, bringing in mandatory sentencing laws and long prison sentences. Regardless of the approach, crime continues to be a problem, and recidivism for some crimes and some offenders remains high. In this assignment, you will explore society’s response to crime and different concepts of justice.

Read the following article from the Argosy University online library:

Research the ideas of justice using the textbook, the Argosy University online library resources, and the Internet.

Based on your research and the discussions so far, analyze the usefulness of the ideas of justice in lowering recidivism. Address the following:

  • Is restorative justice useful in lowering the rate of recidivism? For which types of crimes and offenders is it most useful? Make sure to include any demographic information that may be useful in defending this type of “justice.”
  • Is procedural or moral justice more applicable for this aim? For which types of crimes and offenders is it most useful? Make sure to include any demographic information that may defend one or the other.

Make sure your essay includes the following:

  • A title page with a running head
  • Headings
  • A reference page

Write a 2-page essay in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M5_A1.doc.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Here is the link from the Studypool content checker. https://www.studypool.com/discussPlagiarism/363229...I have also upload a picture from Grammarly showing 6% but those are from the references and in-text citations used throughout the paper. Please take a look at the work that I have provided for you and let me know if you need any edits done. I will help to correct as needed.

Running head: SOCIETY’S RESPONSE TO CRIME

Society’s Response to Crime
You’re Name
Institutional Affiliation
Submission Date

1

SOCIETY’S RESPONSE TO CRIME

2

Restorative justice, a moderately slow development in the criminal equity framework, is
making an offer to take after drug courts as a test that in the long run turns into a standard piece
of the usual experience of justice. In spite of the fact that projects that contain segments of the
restorative justice ideal have existed for a long time, the idea of an all-encompassing umbrella
under which therapeutic projects can flourish is new. The purpose of this paper to explore
whether restorative justice is useful in lowering the rate of recidivism, whether procedural or
moral justice is more applicable for this aim, and to determine which type of justice is most
useful based on the psychological theories of crime.
Restorative Justice and Recidivism
Restorative justice is a procedure by which the damage done to casualties of wrongdoing
can be lessened or repaired (Tyler, 2006). This is by and large an agreeable exertion amongst
victim and litigant in which respondents are made mindful of the particular effect of their
criminal activities. Moreover, the victim of the wrongdoing has a chance to work with the
defendant trying to prevent the litigant from carrying out comparable violations later on.
A study that was distributed in Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice inspected four sorts
of remedial equity programs for adolescent wrongdoers in a little, for the most part, country
range in the upper Midwest (Rodriguez, 2007). These intercessions incorporate eye to eye
intervention amongst casualties and guilty parties, aberrant correspondence amongst victims and
wrongdoers, group boards who remain in for the victim, and even negligible RJ (restorative
justice) mediations that teach criminals about the restorative justice process.

SOCIETY’S RESPONSE TO CRIME

3

The review, in light of 551 youth who were relegated to therapeutic equity or
conventional court procedures in the vicinity of 2000 and 2005, found that 40 percent of the
adolescents submitted another offense inside the average 3.5-year ponder period (Rodriguez,
2007). Youth handled through juvenile courts re-outraged about 50 percent of the time, while
those in a significant equity instructive program conferred new offenses just 31 percent of the
time. More robust therapeutic equity programs likewise had less new crimes than juvenile court
cases, including 24 percent for group boards, 27 percent for circuitous intervention, and 33
percent for direct intercession (Rodriguez, 2007).
The young in the review found the middle value of around 15 years of age and were
included in such offenses as property wrongdoings, curfew infringement, liquor and tobacco
charges, drug possession, and even some brutal violations (Rodriguez, 2007). The review
recommended that adolescents could be screened for hazard components, with less actual guilty
parties doled out to insignificant remedial equity projects, for example, composing a letter to the
casualty, while rehash wrongdoer would be required to partake in the more curious eye to eye
intercession with victims.
Procedural or Moral Justice
After researching the differences between procedural and moral justice regarding juvenile
crimes, the most appropriate for the aim of restorative justice in lessening recidivism would be
that or moral justice.
Most in a general sense, decreasing recidivism by youth under the steady gaze of the
juvenile court ought to keep on being the essential objective of wrongdoing procedures (i.e., the
dispositional intercession ought to be planned principally to "fit the wrongdoer") (Tyler, 2006...


Anonymous
Just what I needed…Fantastic!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags