Detailed Design Document, about interface usability
User Generated
fvquh
Computer Science
Description
(Detailed Design Document)
Value: 50%
Due date: 14-May-2017
Return date: 05-Jun-2017
Length: 25 pages
Submission method options
Alternative submission method
Task
1.Design overview;
2.Project scope;
3.Business and User requirements;
4.Key assumptions;
5.Design process to be used;
6.Interface Design, including the following sections with justification for use:
- All screen layouts;
- All components identified, with justification for their use;
- Workflow diagrams for major tasks (if required);
- Use of colour, frames and sections;
- Help and user assistance functions;
- Use of icons;
- User task navigation;
7.Usability testing and evaluation, including the following sections with justification for use:
- Evaluation aims;
- Evaluation methodology;
- Test audience selection and ethical considerations;
- Evaluation experiments;
- Analysis methodology and procedures.
This is the final design for your project so all the sections in the document should be complete in all detail.
Rationale
This assignment assesses a student's ability to:
- Critically examine and interpret the principles of design that are applicable to the design of an interface;
- Critically examine and evaluate a user interface design to determine if it meets a given set of requirements;
- Interpret, analyse and evaluate usability testing results to plan interface design improvements;
Marking criteria
Question | HD | DI | CR | PS | FL |
Design Overview | Comprehensive overview that clearly articulates the objectives & success criteria | Very detailed overview that articulates the objectives & success criteria | Thorough overview that conveys the objectives & success criteria | Adequate overview that gives a good idea of the objectives & success criteria | Inadequate or incomplete overview that does not convey or does not have the objectives & success criteria |
Project Scope | Comprehensive and clear statement of project scope | Detailed statement of project scope | Thorough statement of project scope | Adequate statement of project scope | Inadequate or incomplete statement of project scope |
Requirements | Comprehensive and clear statement of project requirements | Detailed and clear statement of project requirements | Thorough statement of project requirements | Adequate statement of project requirements | Inadequate or incomplete statement of project requirements |
Assumptions | Comprehensive and clear explanation of assumptions | Detailed and clear explanation of assumptions | Thorough explanation of assumptions | Adequate explanation of assumptions | Inadequate or incomplete explanation of assumptions |
Design Process | Comprehensive and clear statement of design process | Detailed and clear statement of design process | Thorough statement of design process | Adequate statement of design process | Inadequate or incomplete statement of design process |
Interface Design | Comprehensive and clear UI design & drawings, all components clearly identified with excellent justification for use | Detailed UI design & drawings, all components clearly identified with clear justification for use | Good UI design & drawings, all components clearly identified with some justification for use | Adequate UI design & drawings, all components clearly identified with justification for use | Poor or inadequate UI design and/or drawings, few components identified with little or no justification for use |
Usability Testing | Comprehensive and clear evaluation plan with comprehensive aims, methodology, procedures, audience & ethics plans, experiments & analysis | Detailed evaluation plan with well detailed aims, methodology, procedures, audience & ethics plans, experiments & analysis | Thorough evaluation plan with good aims, methodology, procedures, audience & ethics plans, experiments & analysis | Adequate evaluation plan with adequate aims, methodology, procedures, audience & ethics plans, experiments & analysis | Incomplete or inadequate evaluation plan with inadequate aims, methodology, procedures, audience & ethics plans, experiments & analysis |
Presentation, Spelling & Grammar |
| ||||
Referencing | Up to 5 marks will be deducted for not providing / following the proper APA style of referencing. Note that the guide for APA referencing is provided in the Resource section of the ITC504 Interact site |
Presentation
Include your and subject details with your answer in a MS Word document. Your design document should not exceed ~25 pages in length, excluding references. You will need to reference all literature, applications and websites using the APA 6th edition referencing style.
This question has not been answered.
Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!