Detailed Design Document, about interface usability

User Generated

fvquh

Computer Science

Description

(Detailed Design Document)

Value: 50%

Due date: 14-May-2017

Return date: 05-Jun-2017

Length: 25 pages

Submission method options

Alternative submission method

Task

1.Design overview;

2.Project scope;

3.Business and User requirements;

4.Key assumptions;

5.Design process to be used;

6.Interface Design, including the following sections with justification for use:

  • All screen layouts;
  • All components identified, with justification for their use;
  • Workflow diagrams for major tasks (if required);
  • Use of colour, frames and sections;
  • Help and user assistance functions;
  • Use of icons;
  • User task navigation;

7.Usability testing and evaluation, including the following sections with justification for use:

  • Evaluation aims;
  • Evaluation methodology;
  • Test audience selection and ethical considerations;
  • Evaluation experiments;
  • Analysis methodology and procedures.

This is the final design for your project so all the sections in the document should be complete in all detail.

Rationale

This assignment assesses a student's ability to:

  • Critically examine and interpret the principles of design that are applicable to the design of an interface;
  • Critically examine and evaluate a user interface design to determine if it meets a given set of requirements;
  • Interpret, analyse and evaluate usability testing results to plan interface design improvements;

Marking criteria

Question

HD

DI

CR

PS

FL

Design Overview

Comprehensive overview that clearly articulates the objectives & success criteria

Very detailed overview that articulates the objectives & success criteria

Thorough overview that conveys the objectives & success criteria

Adequate overview that gives a good idea of the objectives & success criteria

Inadequate or incomplete overview that does not convey or does not have the objectives & success criteria

Project Scope

Comprehensive and clear statement of project scope

Detailed statement of project scope

Thorough statement of project scope

Adequate statement of project scope

Inadequate or incomplete statement of project scope

Requirements

Comprehensive and clear statement of project requirements

Detailed and clear statement of project requirements

Thorough statement of project requirements

Adequate statement of project requirements

Inadequate or incomplete statement of project requirements

Assumptions

Comprehensive and clear explanation of assumptions

Detailed and clear explanation of assumptions

Thorough explanation of assumptions

Adequate explanation of assumptions

Inadequate or incomplete explanation of assumptions

Design Process

Comprehensive and clear statement of design process

Detailed and clear statement of design process

Thorough statement of design process

Adequate statement of design process

Inadequate or incomplete statement of design process

Interface Design

Comprehensive and clear UI design & drawings, all components clearly identified with excellent justification for use

Detailed UI design & drawings, all components clearly identified with clear justification for use

Good UI design & drawings, all components clearly identified with some justification for use

Adequate UI design & drawings, all components clearly identified with justification for use

Poor or inadequate UI design and/or drawings, few components identified with little or no justification for use

Usability Testing

Comprehensive and clear evaluation plan with comprehensive aims, methodology, procedures, audience & ethics plans, experiments & analysis

Detailed evaluation plan with well detailed aims, methodology, procedures, audience & ethics plans, experiments & analysis

Thorough evaluation plan with good aims, methodology, procedures, audience & ethics plans, experiments & analysis

Adequate evaluation plan with adequate aims, methodology, procedures, audience & ethics plans, experiments & analysis

Incomplete or inadequate evaluation plan with inadequate aims, methodology, procedures, audience & ethics plans, experiments & analysis

Presentation, Spelling & Grammar


Up to 5 marks may be deducted for poor presentation, spelling and grammar

Referencing

Up to 5 marks will be deducted for not providing / following the proper APA style of referencing.

Note that the guide for APA referencing is provided in the Resource section of the ITC504 Interact site

Presentation

Include your and subject details with your answer in a MS Word document. Your design document should not exceed ~25 pages in length, excluding references. You will need to reference all literature, applications and websites using the APA 6th edition referencing style.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

This question has not been answered.

Create a free account to get help with this and any other question!

Related Tags