Discussion of company position against standards 500 words

Anonymous
timer Asked: Apr 29th, 2017

Question description

Discussion of company position against standards

Company Insurance Australian Group Ltd

500 words

  1. Investigate and summarise the key capital adequacy and solvency standards for your nominated financial services company and, using publicly available data, discuss how well the company meets these standards. The summary should include statements of how the key standards are calculated and a table of key metrics specific to your company, i.e. an evaluation of company data against the required standards.


  1. Critically evaluate the Australian stock market’s efficiency.




Max

Introduction

1

Summary of key standards

4

Calculations of company against standards

4

Discussion of company position against standards

4

Efficiency of Australian stock markets

4

Conclusion

1

Discretionary (spelling, grammar, presentation)

2

Total

20 marks


Groups will comprise 2-4 students.

Groups are to notify their local lecturer of the members in a group by 13 March 2017. Any student who has not notified the local lecturer of his/her group affiliation by this time will be allocated into a group at random.

Groups are to request approval from the local lecturer to study a specific, nominated company. This company should be either an authorised (in Australia) deposit taker or a licensed (in Australia) insurance company. The requests are to be submitted 13 March 2017. Groups failing to submit a request by this time will be allocated a company to investigate. Each group must investigate a different company and approvals will be granted on a first come, first served basis.



APPENDIX 2

Rubric – Group Assignment

ILOs

Criteria

Standards

Below Expectations

Meets Expectations

Exceeds Expectations

Level 1 (NN)

Level 2 (PA)

Level 3 (CR)

Level 4 (DI)

Level 5 (HD)

LO4

Australian and international financial markets


Failure of basic understanding of

International financial markets.

Fails to address the questions posed.

Arguments are implausible and unsubstantiated.

Limited or irrelevant research.


Demonstration of basic understanding of international financial markets.

Arguments are generally plausible with some evidence.

Basic research.

Demonstration of good understanding of international financial markets. Arguments with reasonable support. Adequate research

Demonstration of excellent understanding of international financial markets.

Demonstrates high standard of insight and originality.

More than adequate research.


Demonstration of outstanding understanding of international financial markets...

Demonstrates an outstanding insight.

A highly-structures and comprehensive response to questions.

Extensive and relevant research.

LO4

Australian and international financial institutions


Failure of basic understanding international financial institutions.

Fails to address the questions posed.

Arguments are implausible and unsubstantiated.

Limited or irrelevant research.


Demonstration of basic understanding of international financial institutions.

Arguments are generally plausible with some evidence.

Basic research.

Demonstration of good understanding of international financial institutions.

Arguments with reasonable support. Adequate research

Demonstration of excellent understanding of international financial institutions.

Demonstrates high standard of insight and originality.

More than adequate research.


Demonstration of outstanding understanding of international financial institutions.

Demonstrates an outstanding insight.

A highly-structures and comprehensive response to questions.

Extensive and relevant research.

LO5

Regulation of financial markets


Failure of basic understanding of the regulation of financial markets in Australia.

Fails to address the questions posed.

Arguments are implausible and unsubstantiated.

Limited or irrelevant research.


Demonstration of basic understanding of the regulation of financial markets in Australia.

Arguments are generally plausible with some evidence.

Basic research.

Demonstration of good understanding of the regulation of financial markets in Australia.

Arguments with reasonable support. Adequate research

Demonstration of excellent understanding of regulation of Australian financial markets.

Demonstrates high standard of insight and originality.

More than adequate research.


Demonstration of outstanding understanding of the regulation of financial markets in Australia.

Demonstrates an outstanding insight.

A highly-structures and comprehensive response to questions.

Extensive and relevant research.

LO5

Report organisation (Genre, pagination, format, spacing, grammar, spelling, punctuation, referencing)

Poorly-written with errors in spelling and grammar. Mistakes in citations.



Written according to the academic and adheres to academic genre (e.g., with introduction, body of the text, and conclusion). Has accurate spelling, grammar and sentence construction.



Well-written and adheres to academic genre. There are no mistakes in citation.


Very well-written and adheres to academic genre (e.g., with introduction, body of the text, and conclusion).There are no mistakes n citation.


Expertly written and adheres to academic genre. Extraordinarily organised presentation with respect to organisation, clarity of expression, grammar, punctuation, pagination, spacing


Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students
flag Report DMCA
Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags
Study Guides

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors