Description
Double-space, a minimum of 400 words.
• Explain your political philosophy. What party do you support and why?
Explain your economic and social views.
Title: My Politics
Use college level spelling and grammar. Explain and support your positions. A possible 20 points.
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.
Explanation & Answer
Find attached com...
Completion Status:
100%
Review
Review
Anonymous
Great! Studypool always delivers quality work.
Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Most Popular Content
CC The Cuban Revolution Essay
History 115-7440Spring Semester 2020Professor Oscar CañedoGuidelines for JSTOR Review Assignment For this assignment, you ...
CC The Cuban Revolution Essay
History 115-7440Spring Semester 2020Professor Oscar CañedoGuidelines for JSTOR Review Assignment For this assignment, you are to read a journal article about a topic related to a regional topic within the context of the class, and you are asked to use articles from the JSTOR database. Unfortunately, Grossmont College does not have JSTOR available from its library, but some of you may have used JSTOR from institutions like Mesa, Palomar and Southwestern Colleges, in addition to San Diego State or Cal State San Marcos. Therefore I have provided you with an ample selection of articles that I have downloaded from Palomar College's JSTOR database. All you need to do is pick any of the articles for your review. Just click the "Files" section from the Canvas class menu, and open the folder that says "115_JSTOR_ Articles ." Inside the folder are several subfolders with topics arranged by nation, in alphabetical order. The articles are in PDF format and labeled by the topic of the article, so just browse the collection of articles before you make your final selection. You do not need to notify me of your article choice, just pick any one of the articles in any of those subfolders, and you're ready to roll! The due date for this review is Friday, May 22 at 11:59 PM. Late papers will be accepted for one week only and will be assessed with a full grade deduction. The report is to be 5-7 pages in length. Please be sure to use both a title page and works cited page. (title and works cited pages do not count toward the overall page count of your review) You are also encouraged to follow the MLA or Chicago formats to develop this report. Please double-space your review. This review will count as 15% toward your final grade. And in your works cited page, please list the name of the article that you will be summarizing and analyzing. This an example of the type of the format you should follow: “Argentina in 1983: Reflections on the Language of the Military and George Orwell," by Alberto Ciria. Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, Vol. 11, No. 21 (1986), pp. 57-69. In terms of the content of the report, I am looking for two main points of discussion. First, you should devote the first half of the report to a summary of the main points that the author is trying to convey to the reader. To help you to address this issue, consider some of these questions: What type of article is this? Is the author presenting an original feature, or is he/she conducting a book review? If this is a book review, what book (or books) is being reviewed? What is the author’s purpose for writing this article? What is the author’s academic or professional background? As for the second point of discussion, this is where you provide your opinion or perceptions of the article. In other words, what did you think about it? What were the strengths or weaknesses of the article? How did the article relate to the class? You are definitely encouraged to write in first person singular (I feel that..., I think..) as you provide your opinions. As a general rule of thumb, your JSTOR review should be about 60% summary and 40% commentary. Thus a 5-page review with about 3 & 1⁄2 pages summary and 1 & 1⁄2 pages commentary is an ideal proportion.
5 pages
Art History Essay
Compare and contrast the Greek Parthenon to the Roman Pantheon - purposes, features, style, etc. What do these characteris ...
Art History Essay
Compare and contrast the Greek Parthenon to the Roman Pantheon - purposes, features, style, etc. What do these characteristics tell us about these two ...
SOCW 621 Walden University Applying Bowenian And Structural Theories Paper
Submit a 5- to 7-page paper in which you address the following four areas:Describe the agency setting. Is it public or pri ...
SOCW 621 Walden University Applying Bowenian And Structural Theories Paper
Submit a 5- to 7-page paper in which you address the following four areas:Describe the agency setting. Is it public or private, non-profit or for-profit? Is the agency’s primary goal to serve trauma survivors? Approximately what percentage of clients would be defined as trauma survivors?Explain how the setting demonstrates each of the 6 key principles. Provide examples.Using the sample questions on page 14-16 as a guide, assess each of the 10 implementation domains at the agency and explain which key principles are evident in each domain.Provide specific recommendations for improving each of the principles that are not well implemented. Be specific about (1) organizational, (2) environmental, (3) programmatic, and/or (4) administrative changes that would need to occur for your agency to implement a trauma-informed approach.Explain potential barriers to creating trauma-informed services in this setting and how you might address these barriers.The paper should be presented in a clear and coherent manner and reflect critical thinking and a clear understanding of trauma-informed services. It should adhere to APA guidelines.
PHIL 341 West Coast University Ethical Perspectives Paper
Submit as a single Word document:Part IDefine the following ethical perspectives in your own words. A minimum of three sou ...
PHIL 341 West Coast University Ethical Perspectives Paper
Submit as a single Word document:Part IDefine the following ethical perspectives in your own words. A minimum of three sources must be utilized and cited properly with in-text citations and a reference list. Avoid using direct quotes. If you summarize or paraphrase information in your own words, you must cite sources to provide credit for the ideas and concepts.A = Rule utilitarianismB = Kantian ethicsC = Virtue ethicsD = Care ethicsE = Social contract ethicsF = Subjective relativismG = Cultural relativismH = Divine command theoryI = Act utilitarianismPart I IDetermine which ethical perspective above is primarily reflected in each of the ten arguments below and explain why. A minimum of three sources must be utilized and cited properly with in-text citations and in the reference list. Avoid using direct quotes. If you summarize or paraphrase information in your own words, you must cite sources to provide credit for the ideas and concepts.Arguments:Although many societies have practiced human sacrifice, human sacrifice was not considered wrong, even though we believe it is wrong in our culture. Therefore, human sacrifice within those cultures was not really wrong.Same-sex marriage is right because the Constitution offers equal protection under the law and society has agreed to follow the laws set forth in that document."And the pig, though it has a split hoof completely divided, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you. You must not eat their meat or touch their carcasses; they are unclean for you." (Leviticus 11:7–8)Your neighbor runs into her house screaming, blood dripping down her arm. Five minutes later a man with a bloody machete comes running down the street and stops and asks you where she went. You answer honestly "in her house."Margarita spoke with her family and they all agreed that they would let her take the medication that would allow her to die peacefully instead of in pain.Souerette watched over the children in the daycare meticulously. She knew which children she could trust alone because of their behaviors with each other.He does not have the right character and temperament to be a state governor. He avoided service by faking a medical condition, he rarely tells the truth, he eats and drinks too much, and he has little patience with people.Patient autonomy and free choice are morally correct.I believe that it is perfectly fine to lie about some things.Wearing a mask when engaging with the public is the right decision because it protects the welfare of those in your community.
PSYC221 American Military Differences of Psychosexual & Psychosocial Theories Paper
Theory Compare / Contrast PaperFor this assignment, you will write a paper no less than 7 pages in length, not including r ...
PSYC221 American Military Differences of Psychosexual & Psychosocial Theories Paper
Theory Compare / Contrast PaperFor this assignment, you will write a paper no less than 7 pages in length, not including required cover and Reference pages, comparing and contrasting two personality theories from the course. You are free to select from among the several theories covered in the course to date but only two theories may be used.Your task is to demonstrate your knowledge of these theories you chose via descriptions of their key concepts and detailing the most important aspects of each theory in explaining personality. It is recommended that you revisit the material covered to date to refresh your knowledge of theory details. This is a comprehensive assignment and you should demonstrate in your work that you have studied and comprehended the similarities and the differences between your two chosen theories. This is a fact based paper only. It should not be based upon your preference for a theory or your opinion.Your submission should be double-spaced with 1 inch margins on all sides of each page and should be free of spelling and grammar errors. It must include source crediting of any materials used in APA format, including source citations in the body of your paper and in a Reference list attached to the end.
AR 115 Park University Unit 8 The Autumn Landscape Response Essay
IntroductionThis exercise is called a response essay. Looking is not as simple as you may think. Rather than merely descri ...
AR 115 Park University Unit 8 The Autumn Landscape Response Essay
IntroductionThis exercise is called a response essay. Looking is not as simple as you may think. Rather than merely describe the object, you will want to analyze it. You need to ask yourself the questions:“What associations, ideas or emotions does the work evoke for me?”“Why do I have this response? What attributes of this work (lines, colors, subject matter, expressions) evoke those associations, ideas or emotions?The challenge is to analyze a work of art, separating its parts in order to understand the whole. You must resist the urge to merely describe, and instead evaluate the object. DirectionsOrganization of the PaperMechanics of the PaperOrganization of the Paper(Further explanations and examples can be found in the Survival Guide handout)The Introduction (Not necessarily in order.)Write a Short Description of the Work You Have Chosen. Include identifying subject matter or forms, setting or space, color, and medium, artist and current location. State Your Main Argument. A thesis statement related to the overall effect or meaning of the object. (i.e. What does this work mean?)State (Briefly) the Ways in Which You Will Prove It. (Forecast your main points.)The Main Body: You will describe three or four pieces of evidence from the work you’re looking at to support your thesis statement. This evidence can be from any of the following areas. You don’t need to use them all.The medium (the material the work is made with), the medium’s traits, and the artist’s use of the medium.The relevant visual elements (i.e.: line, shape and space, composition and relative scale, light and color, style)The composition (i.e.: unity/variety, balance, emphasis, focal point)The subject matter, if the work is representational. (What does it picture. If there are people, how do they react to each other or the viewer.)The relationship the formal elements and composition have to the subject’s meaning (or overall effect).The ConclusionRestate the Main Argument.Place this work of art into the big picture. Relate it to a larger issue, art-historical movement, etc.Attach an image of the object (This can be a postcard purchased from the museum bookstore, a photograph, or your sketch. Your own sketch does not need to be professional quality.)NOTE:Don’t forget to include the objective information somewhere within the paper: artist, culture, date and period; medium; size; museum. Most, if not all, will be available on the museum label found near the object.Keep in mind that this is not a narrative essay. In other words, we’re not looking for the story of your museum visit. We’re looking for your persuasive argument about what the work you’ve chosen means and what the evidence is that it means what you say.Mechanics of the PaperThe paper should be 1000 words in length. This will turn out to be approximately 5 to 6 paragraphs, and approximately 3-5 pages in length.Pages numbered.Proper organization, complete sentences, grammar, punctuation, spelling and word choice.Remember that less-than-graceful writing will count strongly against you, as well as misspellings and typos and other signs of carelessness. Proofread. It helps to have someone else read over your draft before you finalize it. You’ll be amazed at what you miss.Professor Comments: Great job on the rough draft! On the final skip the headings for each section as it interrupts the flow of the paper.
Similar Content
SPC 1017 KU Impact of Beauty Standards of Women Health Informative Speech Paper
This week we begin working on our first speech - Informative Speech. This speech will be video recorded (no audio presenta...
Arab Family Beliefs and Values Questions Discussion
Please, in your discussion respond to the question and give examples or insight from your experience as an Arab person or ...
Protesting for Civil Rights, political science homework help
In this activity you will find background information and directions to resources for further research.Download the handou...
Foucault and Fanon Biopower & State Regimes Develop Analysis
Analyze the two texts using this questions below (3 pages more or less). -Frantz Fanon- Wretched of the Earth-Michel Fouca...
Wilhelm Wundt and Scientific Psychology.
Wilhelm Wundt is often referred to as the founder of scientific psychology. His work, focusing on the structural component...
Improvement on English Construction
Reflect upon the feedback that you received on your writing.How did this feedback enhance your original writing?How did th...
History.
In the documentary Tecumseh’s Vision, the film narrates itself through interviews that it conducts. The narrator heavily...
MGT312 Phoenix Theory of Multiple Intelligences and Management Final Exam
1) Performance on tests like the Scholastic Aptitude Test and the Graduate Management Admissions Test is likely to be most...
Sociology-Research INNOVATIONS
Automobiles changed the world in the 20th Century. They have given people the freedom to live, work, and travel almost any...
Related Tags
Book Guides
Les Miserables
by Victor Hugo
The Hunger Games
by Suzanne Collins
The Red Badge of Courage
by Stephen Crane
The Underground Railroad
by Colson Whitehead
Animal Farm
by George Orwell
The Two Towers
by J. R. R. Tolkien
Daisy Miller
by Henry James
The President is Missing
by James Patterson, Bill Clinton
The Aftermath
by Rhidian Brook
Get 24/7
Homework help
Our tutors provide high quality explanations & answers.
Post question
Most Popular Content
CC The Cuban Revolution Essay
History 115-7440Spring Semester 2020Professor Oscar CañedoGuidelines for JSTOR Review Assignment For this assignment, you ...
CC The Cuban Revolution Essay
History 115-7440Spring Semester 2020Professor Oscar CañedoGuidelines for JSTOR Review Assignment For this assignment, you are to read a journal article about a topic related to a regional topic within the context of the class, and you are asked to use articles from the JSTOR database. Unfortunately, Grossmont College does not have JSTOR available from its library, but some of you may have used JSTOR from institutions like Mesa, Palomar and Southwestern Colleges, in addition to San Diego State or Cal State San Marcos. Therefore I have provided you with an ample selection of articles that I have downloaded from Palomar College's JSTOR database. All you need to do is pick any of the articles for your review. Just click the "Files" section from the Canvas class menu, and open the folder that says "115_JSTOR_ Articles ." Inside the folder are several subfolders with topics arranged by nation, in alphabetical order. The articles are in PDF format and labeled by the topic of the article, so just browse the collection of articles before you make your final selection. You do not need to notify me of your article choice, just pick any one of the articles in any of those subfolders, and you're ready to roll! The due date for this review is Friday, May 22 at 11:59 PM. Late papers will be accepted for one week only and will be assessed with a full grade deduction. The report is to be 5-7 pages in length. Please be sure to use both a title page and works cited page. (title and works cited pages do not count toward the overall page count of your review) You are also encouraged to follow the MLA or Chicago formats to develop this report. Please double-space your review. This review will count as 15% toward your final grade. And in your works cited page, please list the name of the article that you will be summarizing and analyzing. This an example of the type of the format you should follow: “Argentina in 1983: Reflections on the Language of the Military and George Orwell," by Alberto Ciria. Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, Vol. 11, No. 21 (1986), pp. 57-69. In terms of the content of the report, I am looking for two main points of discussion. First, you should devote the first half of the report to a summary of the main points that the author is trying to convey to the reader. To help you to address this issue, consider some of these questions: What type of article is this? Is the author presenting an original feature, or is he/she conducting a book review? If this is a book review, what book (or books) is being reviewed? What is the author’s purpose for writing this article? What is the author’s academic or professional background? As for the second point of discussion, this is where you provide your opinion or perceptions of the article. In other words, what did you think about it? What were the strengths or weaknesses of the article? How did the article relate to the class? You are definitely encouraged to write in first person singular (I feel that..., I think..) as you provide your opinions. As a general rule of thumb, your JSTOR review should be about 60% summary and 40% commentary. Thus a 5-page review with about 3 & 1⁄2 pages summary and 1 & 1⁄2 pages commentary is an ideal proportion.
5 pages
Art History Essay
Compare and contrast the Greek Parthenon to the Roman Pantheon - purposes, features, style, etc. What do these characteris ...
Art History Essay
Compare and contrast the Greek Parthenon to the Roman Pantheon - purposes, features, style, etc. What do these characteristics tell us about these two ...
SOCW 621 Walden University Applying Bowenian And Structural Theories Paper
Submit a 5- to 7-page paper in which you address the following four areas:Describe the agency setting. Is it public or pri ...
SOCW 621 Walden University Applying Bowenian And Structural Theories Paper
Submit a 5- to 7-page paper in which you address the following four areas:Describe the agency setting. Is it public or private, non-profit or for-profit? Is the agency’s primary goal to serve trauma survivors? Approximately what percentage of clients would be defined as trauma survivors?Explain how the setting demonstrates each of the 6 key principles. Provide examples.Using the sample questions on page 14-16 as a guide, assess each of the 10 implementation domains at the agency and explain which key principles are evident in each domain.Provide specific recommendations for improving each of the principles that are not well implemented. Be specific about (1) organizational, (2) environmental, (3) programmatic, and/or (4) administrative changes that would need to occur for your agency to implement a trauma-informed approach.Explain potential barriers to creating trauma-informed services in this setting and how you might address these barriers.The paper should be presented in a clear and coherent manner and reflect critical thinking and a clear understanding of trauma-informed services. It should adhere to APA guidelines.
PHIL 341 West Coast University Ethical Perspectives Paper
Submit as a single Word document:Part IDefine the following ethical perspectives in your own words. A minimum of three sou ...
PHIL 341 West Coast University Ethical Perspectives Paper
Submit as a single Word document:Part IDefine the following ethical perspectives in your own words. A minimum of three sources must be utilized and cited properly with in-text citations and a reference list. Avoid using direct quotes. If you summarize or paraphrase information in your own words, you must cite sources to provide credit for the ideas and concepts.A = Rule utilitarianismB = Kantian ethicsC = Virtue ethicsD = Care ethicsE = Social contract ethicsF = Subjective relativismG = Cultural relativismH = Divine command theoryI = Act utilitarianismPart I IDetermine which ethical perspective above is primarily reflected in each of the ten arguments below and explain why. A minimum of three sources must be utilized and cited properly with in-text citations and in the reference list. Avoid using direct quotes. If you summarize or paraphrase information in your own words, you must cite sources to provide credit for the ideas and concepts.Arguments:Although many societies have practiced human sacrifice, human sacrifice was not considered wrong, even though we believe it is wrong in our culture. Therefore, human sacrifice within those cultures was not really wrong.Same-sex marriage is right because the Constitution offers equal protection under the law and society has agreed to follow the laws set forth in that document."And the pig, though it has a split hoof completely divided, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you. You must not eat their meat or touch their carcasses; they are unclean for you." (Leviticus 11:7–8)Your neighbor runs into her house screaming, blood dripping down her arm. Five minutes later a man with a bloody machete comes running down the street and stops and asks you where she went. You answer honestly "in her house."Margarita spoke with her family and they all agreed that they would let her take the medication that would allow her to die peacefully instead of in pain.Souerette watched over the children in the daycare meticulously. She knew which children she could trust alone because of their behaviors with each other.He does not have the right character and temperament to be a state governor. He avoided service by faking a medical condition, he rarely tells the truth, he eats and drinks too much, and he has little patience with people.Patient autonomy and free choice are morally correct.I believe that it is perfectly fine to lie about some things.Wearing a mask when engaging with the public is the right decision because it protects the welfare of those in your community.
PSYC221 American Military Differences of Psychosexual & Psychosocial Theories Paper
Theory Compare / Contrast PaperFor this assignment, you will write a paper no less than 7 pages in length, not including r ...
PSYC221 American Military Differences of Psychosexual & Psychosocial Theories Paper
Theory Compare / Contrast PaperFor this assignment, you will write a paper no less than 7 pages in length, not including required cover and Reference pages, comparing and contrasting two personality theories from the course. You are free to select from among the several theories covered in the course to date but only two theories may be used.Your task is to demonstrate your knowledge of these theories you chose via descriptions of their key concepts and detailing the most important aspects of each theory in explaining personality. It is recommended that you revisit the material covered to date to refresh your knowledge of theory details. This is a comprehensive assignment and you should demonstrate in your work that you have studied and comprehended the similarities and the differences between your two chosen theories. This is a fact based paper only. It should not be based upon your preference for a theory or your opinion.Your submission should be double-spaced with 1 inch margins on all sides of each page and should be free of spelling and grammar errors. It must include source crediting of any materials used in APA format, including source citations in the body of your paper and in a Reference list attached to the end.
AR 115 Park University Unit 8 The Autumn Landscape Response Essay
IntroductionThis exercise is called a response essay. Looking is not as simple as you may think. Rather than merely descri ...
AR 115 Park University Unit 8 The Autumn Landscape Response Essay
IntroductionThis exercise is called a response essay. Looking is not as simple as you may think. Rather than merely describe the object, you will want to analyze it. You need to ask yourself the questions:“What associations, ideas or emotions does the work evoke for me?”“Why do I have this response? What attributes of this work (lines, colors, subject matter, expressions) evoke those associations, ideas or emotions?The challenge is to analyze a work of art, separating its parts in order to understand the whole. You must resist the urge to merely describe, and instead evaluate the object. DirectionsOrganization of the PaperMechanics of the PaperOrganization of the Paper(Further explanations and examples can be found in the Survival Guide handout)The Introduction (Not necessarily in order.)Write a Short Description of the Work You Have Chosen. Include identifying subject matter or forms, setting or space, color, and medium, artist and current location. State Your Main Argument. A thesis statement related to the overall effect or meaning of the object. (i.e. What does this work mean?)State (Briefly) the Ways in Which You Will Prove It. (Forecast your main points.)The Main Body: You will describe three or four pieces of evidence from the work you’re looking at to support your thesis statement. This evidence can be from any of the following areas. You don’t need to use them all.The medium (the material the work is made with), the medium’s traits, and the artist’s use of the medium.The relevant visual elements (i.e.: line, shape and space, composition and relative scale, light and color, style)The composition (i.e.: unity/variety, balance, emphasis, focal point)The subject matter, if the work is representational. (What does it picture. If there are people, how do they react to each other or the viewer.)The relationship the formal elements and composition have to the subject’s meaning (or overall effect).The ConclusionRestate the Main Argument.Place this work of art into the big picture. Relate it to a larger issue, art-historical movement, etc.Attach an image of the object (This can be a postcard purchased from the museum bookstore, a photograph, or your sketch. Your own sketch does not need to be professional quality.)NOTE:Don’t forget to include the objective information somewhere within the paper: artist, culture, date and period; medium; size; museum. Most, if not all, will be available on the museum label found near the object.Keep in mind that this is not a narrative essay. In other words, we’re not looking for the story of your museum visit. We’re looking for your persuasive argument about what the work you’ve chosen means and what the evidence is that it means what you say.Mechanics of the PaperThe paper should be 1000 words in length. This will turn out to be approximately 5 to 6 paragraphs, and approximately 3-5 pages in length.Pages numbered.Proper organization, complete sentences, grammar, punctuation, spelling and word choice.Remember that less-than-graceful writing will count strongly against you, as well as misspellings and typos and other signs of carelessness. Proofread. It helps to have someone else read over your draft before you finalize it. You’ll be amazed at what you miss.Professor Comments: Great job on the rough draft! On the final skip the headings for each section as it interrupts the flow of the paper.
Earn money selling
your Study Documents