ART 105Museum Assignment:Formal Analysis Paper (3 pages, typed)Your assignment is to go the Museum of Contemporary Art or to visit the new Modern Wing at the Art Institute of Chicago. You will have to select one contemporary (made after 1960) work of art (any media) and analyze and interpret its visual properties in a short Formal Analysis paper. Note: if you are not from the Chicago area, you may select another major museum to visit. At the museum, you should take detailed notes about the work: materials, formal elements, how the work is displayed, size, etc. Also, note the object label (museum label/plaque), which gives the artist, title, date, materials, and size. You might want to make a detailed sketch of the work for later reference or a photograph—if allowed. (Flash photography is prohibited in museums since the light can damage the artwork.)Formal Analysis: the interpretation of a work of art through its visual or material qualities. Introduce the work: artist, title, date, and medium (materials) in one or two sentences. (This should come in your introduction.) Make sure to have a thesis statement: what does the work of art communicates and how? The HOW will be the real heart of your paper. Describe the work visually, in detail, identifying which formal elements and principles of design are present. Make sure to examine how different elements react and respond to and with one another and how they are structured within the overall composition. Each paragraph should be organized and focused on an element or principle of design and how they support your interpretation. These paragraphs will become the body of your paper. Interpret the meaning or message of the work through visual analysis. Make sure that your conclusion supports your analysis of the key visual elements and principles of design that were discussed in your paper. This exercise is about looking, describing, and analyzing; however, this is not simply a visual description or an inventory of the physical qualities of your work. A formal analysis requires you to interpret the physical qualities that make up the visual totality of the artwork: what are the significant formal elements of the work that the artist has selected and how can we read/view meaning in them? How does the work generate meaning from the interaction and conversation of the visual elements and the situated viewer? This analysis should emerge from a thoughtful visual exploration of the media and the inter-relationship of the formal elements and how they are arranged. Be sure to start with the general and move to the particular; support your analysis with actual details in the work. Your formal analysis should be organized with relation to the significant visual elements of the work. You should try to include an image of your work (If you cannot find the exact work, an approximation will do). Your analysis should be three pages—typed and double-spaced. NOTE: This project does not require and should not include outside research. I am looking for your OWN visual analysis based on a careful study of the physical features of the artwork.Helpful Hints: Titles of artworks need to be italicized Include the dimension and media of your artwork Cite all sources in MLA format that you use in your paper: museum labels, brochures, internet, etc. Visit the https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/02/ for help with MLA citation For further guidelines please refer to: Sylvan Barnet’s A Short Guide to Writing About Art and Anne D’Alleva’s Look! The Fundamentals of Art History— both are on reserve in the library.

Week Four JournalReflect back about what you have learned in this course about how to construct high quality arguments for positions. Give an example of how the ability to construct good arguments could help you in your career or in your daily life. Also, in what ways will the skill of being able to evaluate the quality of reasoning better enable you to discover what is true and to make better choices? (Give a specific example of each).Finally, consider the argument you have been developing for your writing assignments. How has considering objections helped you clarify your perspective? What might you add to your argument to make it more convincing in light of those objections? What points would you recommend that people keep in mind in order to be fair to both sides?Your journal entry must be at least 250 words. You do not need to follow APA style for this journal entry, but you should proofread your work to eliminate errors of grammar and spelling.

For this discussion, we will consider the management of specialized prison populations. Based on the current sensitivity to the transgender population, where would be the best place to house transgender inmates? Would you put a biological male the identifies as a female in a women’s prison? Would you put a biological female that identifies as a male inside a men’s prison? Why or why not? Your submission must be no less than 400 words and respond to two classmates.