write several paragraphs for 50 bucks need it in Wednesday night.

User Generated

Puneyvrpura

Writing

Description

you can see details in attached file

Unformatted Attachment Preview

You made it! Well, almost. The last hill to scale is the final exam, and it’s my last opportunity to make sure you are doing deep thinking about this course and your ideas and thinking as well. I don’t plan on squandering it. As such, you’ll be tested on two podcasts and three readings, which should show your persuasive arguments and deep thinking in action. The exam will include: 1) Two, two paragraph essays that summarize and highlight the ideas discussed on the podcast as well as your substantive reaction to them. What does substantive mean in this context? It means going beyond simply regurgitating the information from the podcast and doing higher level thinking about your own thought processes or life. 2) A short essay that describes something you changed your mind about during the course of the semester. In this paper, you should take advantage of anecdotes, examples, and your own I say voice to talk about how and why you changed your mind. If you didn’t change your mind about anything, examine why in the context of the podcasts you listened to. 3) For the second short essay, you’ll be using the article, a nation without borders. In this essay, you’ll summarize the chief arguments presented in that essay and make an argument of your own based on an I say model. You can use research, opinion, etc. to inform your opinion. 4) The third short response will follow the same structure, you’ll agree or disagree, using research, I say, anecdotes to agree or disagree with the article, In Praise of Not Reading. 5) For the final essay, you need to choose someone on Instagram to follow, after briefly summarizing the argument in Camera Lucida essay, you will describe the picture you've selected in detail and use its form and image to guide any other abstract thinking you have about Instagram, art, and paying attention. Don't hesitate to ask me any further questions if you have them. You can outline the essays as much as you'd like in advance of class. https://youarenotsosmart.com/2017/01/30/yanss-094-how-motivated-skepticism-strengthensincorrect-beliefs/ https://youarenotsosmart.com/2017/02/11/yanss-095-how-to-fight-back-against-the-backfireeffect/ YANSS 095 – How to fight back against the backfire effect ... youarenotsosmart.com If you ask a social scientist familiar with motivated reasoning and the backfire effect if there is any hope to ever reach people who refuse to accept facts – is ... YANSS 094 – How motivated skepticism strengthens incorrect ... youarenotsosmart.com In short, when you have a hunch that you might already understand something, but don’t know for sure, you tend to go searching for information that will confirm ... https://thepointmag.com/2017/politics/a-nation-doesnt-need-walls-conversation-on-theborder https://thepointmag.com/2016/criticism/camera-phone-lucida https://thepointmag.com/2017/criticism/in-praise-of-not-not-reading In Praise of Not Not Reading | The Point Magazine thepointmag.com Moreen Halmo. I loved Sheila Liming’s piece about not, not reading. Reading is life — being in it, the history of it, what it’s about, figuring it out, living ... Camera-phone Lucida | The Point Magazine thepointmag.com Forty years ago, the great art historian Michael Baxandall introduced the idea of the period eye. Renaissance viewers, for instance, brought a world of experience to ... A Nation Doesn’t Need Walls A Conversation on the Border ... thepointmag.com Francisco Cantú worked as a border-patrol agent in Arizona, New Mexico and Texas from 2008 to 2012. Since leaving the patrol, his writing has appeared in Guernica ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Who was our in

Surname 1

Student’s Name
Professor
Course
Date
You are not so smart podcasts: How they have changed my mind
I have always liked arguing on the basis of what someone said in the past. I think this is
one element that makes politicians and lawyers, but coming to think of the fact that I am not so
smart, I have realized that this is not a good way to look at things. It is not always right to hold
people on the basis of what they had said, like they are not supposed to tell us otherwise. I have
learned that this is a mental process that affects everyone, because changing initial information is
very difficult. McRaney (2017), the speaker in the podcast compares it to changing a leg of a
table which is already complete and stable.
A scenario that relates to the above is about my birthday. I celebrated my birthday on 4th
September since year-one of my life till I was 16. Close to my birthday, my mother remembered
to collect some documents from the hospital where she I was delivered. She was revisiting my
birth information. She realized that I was born on 2nd September in the process. On my 16th
birthday, my party came early and I was sad. I did not like. I have not liked the date though I
embraced it because my brain was skeptical about it. This has changed.
After learning that I am not so smart from the podcasts, I have learned that it is not
always right to stich with wrong information, even though it is something that is automatic to
human cognition. It is not fair to be skeptical to people because they changed their minds. I feel

Surname 2

like I will have to call my mother and let her know that I appreciate my birthday because I want...


Anonymous
Excellent! Definitely coming back for more study materials.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags