1. Give three arguments in favor of the exclusionary rule as it currently stands, and three arguments against it. Then explain your position on the issue, supporting it with logical examples2. The exclusionary rule was fashioned to deter police misconduct. The Supreme Court has refused to apply it to cases where the misconduct was not by the police. Should the exclusionary rule be extended to other public officers besides the police? Why or why not? If so, to what other public officers should the rule apply?3.What was the effect of Mapp v. Ohio upon the criminal justice system?4. The Court has held that probable cause is necessary for a stationhouse detention accompanied by interrogation as opposed to ust fingerprinting even if no expressed arrest is made. Do you agree with this holding Support your position.5. Stops based on race alone are not valid but there is disagreement whether race can be taken as one factor in determining reasonable suspicion for a stop.  Under what circumstances should race be allowed as one factor in determining reasonable suspicion for a stop  ive an example to support your conclusion.6. Using the guidelines in seuence that were set in Terry v. Ohio create a police department procedure for stopping and frisking an individual.  Be specific7. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the Constitution requires that the police must announce their purpose before breaking into a dwelling.  Name and discuss two of the exceptions to this rule.8. The Supreme Court has issued opinions in cases dealing with a wide range of intrusiveness in searches and seizures.  Why are roadblocks to control the flow of illegal aliens less intrusive than stationhouse detention?9. Define, compare, and contrast actual and constructive seizures. Give an example of each.10. Discuss the different factors governing use of deadly force and use of non-deadly force. Provide examples of situation in which each would be permissible.11. Discuss the issues regarding computer searches and the following: search and seizure, probable cause, and reasonable expectation of privacy.12. Searches of probationers and parolees are a special needs situation, and are permitted without a search warrant.  Explain the justification for this exception.13. Define and describe the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement.  What are the four general types of circumstances that are typically recognized as being exigent circumstances?14. Define and provide an example of a pretext (pretextual) motor vehicle stop. What did the U.S. Supreme Court say about such stops in Whren v. U.S. (1996)? Explain why you agree or disagree with that decision.15. What types of checkpoints or roadblocks have been approved or disapproved by the U.S. Supreme Court? Do you agree or disagree with the Court’s decisions on any or all of these types? Explain your position.16. The authority of the police to search a vehicle without a warrant and based on probable cause is extensive.  Name the three things that an officer can do after the vehicle is stopped, when the officer has probable cause for the search and the vehicle is mobile.  How does the reasonable expectation of privacy support the need for a warrant to search locked trunks or glove compartments?  Explain your answer.17. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that although a vehicle stop is a form of seizure, the motorist is not fully protected by the Fourth Amendment. Explain the reasons given by the Supreme Court in this decision. Do you agree? Why or why not?18. What are four factors that can be used to distinguish between the open fields and curtilage?  Provide examples.19. Define abandoned property and discuss the guidelines for determining when items are considered abandoned.20. An officer is coming out of a house after responding to a call.  She sees pots of marijuana inside a fenced yard next door.  Discuss the different requirements for the admissibility of what she sees and what is required to seize the marijuana.21. Define, compare, and contrast the Kirby and Wade-Gilbert rules.  Do you agree or disagree with each rule?  Explain your position.22. Define, compare, and contrast the Daubert and Frye doctrines.  Which one will, in general result in the introduction of more scientific evidence?  Explain your position.  Which rule do you think is best?  Explain your position.23. What is the current position of the U.S. Supreme Court on the reliability and admissibility of polygraph evidence?  Do you think polygraph evidence should be admissible in court?  Why or why not?  Explain your position.24. Specify three types of situations where statements obtained in violation of Miranda, or evidence obtained from such a statement, can still be utilized as evidence.  Do you agree or disagree that such exceptions to Miranda should be allowed?  Explain your position.​25. Compare and contrast U.S. v. Henry (1980) with Illinois v. Perkins (1990). Take a stance on each of these two positions, and explain your reasons.  Can these two decisions be reconciled, or do you believe that they are too contradictory in nature for this to be possible?​26. Miranda warnings are required during police custodial interrogation.  How is “custody” defined for Miranda purposes?  Give two examples of interrogation situations where custody would exist, and two where it would not.​27. Discuss ONE of the following cases: Edwards v. Arizona (1981), or Arizona v. Roberson (1988), or Minnick v. Mississippi (1991).  Is the case that you selected consistent with Miranda?  Has the law as represented in this case evolved to benefit defendants rather than the government?​28. The Sixth Amendment provides defendants a number of rights. Discuss these rights and how they apply in the criminal justice process.​29. The Constitution does not require a unanimous verdict in criminal cases. Many states and the federal system do require a unanimous verdict. Should all criminal trials be required to have unanimous verdicts? What practical issues might result?30. There are two kinds of challenges the prosecutor and the defense lawyer can use when selecting a jury.  What are they and how do these challenges differ?  Which challenge is bad for the defendant, and why?​.

Purpose?  This assignment is intended to give you an opportunity to strengthen your skills in gathering and analyzing business-related information. It provides a deeper understanding of how companies can look at globalization as part of their strategic and operational plans. The assignment has two parts: one focused on information research and analysis, and the other is on applied analytics.   Resources:? Microsoft® Excel®  "How Netflix Expanded to 190 Countries in 7 Years" from Harvard Business Review Call Center Waiting Time Part 1: Globalization and Information Research  Context:?Companies that perform well in their country of origin usually consider expanding operations in new international markets. Deciding where, how, and when to expand is not an easy task, though.   Many issues need to be considered before crafting an expansion strategy and investing significant resources to this end, including:   the level of demand to be expected for the company’s products/services  presence of local competitors  the regulatory, economic, demographic, and political environments  Carefully researching and analyzing these and other factors can help mitigate the inherent risk associated with an overseas expansion strategy, thus increasing the likelihood of success.  As a data analyst in your company’s business development department, you’ve been tasked with the responsibility of recommending countries for international expansion. You’ll write a report to the company’s executive team with your research, analysis, and recommendations.  Instructions:   Write a 525-word summary covering the following items:  According to the article listed above, what were the most important strategic moves that propelled Netflix’s successful international expansion?  The article mentions investments in big data and analytics as one of the elements accompanying the second phase of overseas expansion. Why was this investment important? What type of information did Netflix derive from the data collected?  According to the article, what is exponential globalization?  Not all international expansion strategies are a resounding success, however. Research an article or video that discusses an instance in which an American company’s expansion efforts in another country failed. According to the article/video you selected, what were the main reasons for this failure? Do you agree with this assessment?  Explain some of the reasons why certain companies’ expansion plans have failed in the past.  Part 2: Hypothesis testing   Context:?Your organization is evaluating the quality of its call center operations. One of the most important metrics in a call center is Time in Queue (TiQ), which is the time a customer has to wait before he/she is serviced by a Customer Service Representative (CSR). If a customer has to wait for too long, he/she is more likely to get discouraged and hang up. Furthermore, customers who have to wait too long in the queue typically report a negative overall experience with the call. You’ve conducted an exhaustive literature review and found that the average TiQ in your industry is 2.5 minutes (150 seconds).  Another important metric is Service Time (ST), also known as Handle Time, which is the time a CSR spends servicing the customer. CSR’s with more experience and deeper knowledge tend to resolve customer calls faster. Companies can improve average ST by providing more training to their CSR’s or even by channeling calls according to area of expertise. Last month your company had an average ST of approximately 3.5 minutes (210 seconds). In an effort to improve this metric, the company has implemented a new protocol that channels calls to CSR’s based on area of expertise. The new protocol (PE) is being tested side-by-side with the traditional (PT) protocol.   Instructions:  Access the Call Center Waiting Time file. Each row in the database corresponds to a different call. The column variables are as follows:  ProtocolType: indicates protocol type, either PT or PE QueueTime: Time in Queue, in seconds ServiceTime: Service Time, in seconds Perform a test of hypothesis to determine whether the average TiQ is lower than the industry standard of 2.5 minutes (150 seconds). Use a significance level of ?=0.05.   Evaluate if the company should allocate more resources to improve its average TiQ.  Perform a test of hypothesis to determine whether the average ST with service protocol PE is lower than with the PT protocol. Use a significance level of ?=0.05.   Assess if the new protocol served its purpose. (Hint: this should be a test of means for 2 independent groups.)