Description
1. Imagine such a game. What do you think of this game? Is it insensitive, does it trivialize the actions of killers or would it serve as a prodrome to those who play it, urging them to heed warning signs? How could an online game about the incident be made to be a lesson of understanding? Can a game be fun and educational/informative?
2. Why do political figures frequently lose their positions after scandals, but entertainers and sports figures, even if they go to jail, are often returned to their former positions as stars? If you were a publicist or agent to a celebrity, would you attempt to establish rules with your client, warn him/ her about appropriate and inappropriate behavior, or just bank your salary and let things occur?
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
1
Running head: CRITICAL THINKING
Critical Thinking
Name:
Instructor:
Course Title:
Date:
CRITICAL THINKING
2
Question 1
The game is insensitive given that it is fictitious. It does not reflect any iota of reality
since it is based on unreality. However, the fact that the game has some elements of realism
makes it trivialize the action of killers (Victorcarm, 2014). In a game where a good cop kills bad
criminals who intend to kill him makes their death overcome evil. In the game, death stands as
the only option that can bring peace in the world. It shows that there is no amount of actions that
killers can do to defeat the good that exists in the world.
There is an aspect of pro-drome context in the game. People who intend to become
criminals can b...
Review
Review
