W.L. GORE CASE STUDY
Background
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. is a global, privately held company headquartered in Newark,
Delaware. It employs approximately 8,000 employees (called associates) in more than 45
locations worldwide. Founded by a husband-and-wife team in 1958, its manufacturing operations
are clustered in the U.S., Germany, Japan, China and Scotland. There are three sites in Scotland,
two in Livingston and one in Dundee, employing approximately 450 people. Gore produces
proprietary technologies with versatile polymer polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) used in products
in the health care and leisure industries. It is especially known for products like GORE-TEX®
and ELIXIR strings. Gore is known not just for its innovative products, but also for its innovative
business style (Gore’s written business objective is “To make money and have fun”). Gore
strives to create a unique corporate culture. Quite simply, the culture is driven, according to cofounder Bill Gore, from the need to “foster the creativity and initiative that contribute to
technical development.”
Corporate Culture and Working Hours
The organizational culture is founded on a team-based environment where teams are organized
around opportunities and leaders emerge. Teams are fluid and comprise followers and leaders.
Employees, known as associates, have no defined job titles, only general task/responsibility
areas. Leaders emerge naturally by demonstrating special knowledge, a skill and/or experience
that will move the business objective forward. According to Ann Gillies, an associate in the HR
team in Scotland, leaders are defined not by organizational status but by ‘followership’ because
of “personal influence, not power”. The roles of leaders and followers are interchangeable by
work projects. All associates have a sponsor, or mentor, assigned to guide them to “chart a
course in the organization that will offer personal fulfillment while maximizing their contribution
to the enterprise.” In this way, associates can alternately—and simultaneously—be leader,
follower and sponsor. Case Study One 6 © 2008 Society for Human Resource Management. Gill
Maxwell Enabling this corporate culture of teamwork is a commitment to four basic principles
(as espoused by Bill Gore) that drive the organization’s activities:
Fairness to each other and everyone with whom they come into contact.
Freedom to encourage, help and allow other associates grow in knowledge, skill and scope of
responsibility.
The ability to make one’s own commitments and keep them.
Consultation with other associates before undertaking actions that could affect the reputation of
the company by hitting it “below the waterline.”
It is the corporate culture based on the four fundamental principles that integrates and enables
work-life balance at W.L. Gore. Gillies believes Gore operates fairly and that associates are not
managed but instead manage themselves by being fair, meeting commitments and consulting
others as appropriate. Consequently there are very few company policies, procedures or rules;
practices develop naturally and do not need to be framed in policies. There are no policies and
procedures, therefore, that explicitly relate to work-life balance. However, the company’s
approach to worklife balance can be seen in its approach to working hours. Working hours,
according to Gillies, are central to Gore’s approach. There are no set working hours; “people
make commitments… they are never imposed and people keep to their commitments.” Gillies
continues, “Personal and family responsibilites are okay—people have no need to explain if they
are not going to be at work, but tend to anyway because we are fair to each other.” When
commitments require staffing for specific hours, the team in that area decide individuals’ hours
of work. Some people choose to work from home, and office attendance is recorded only for fire
safety. The need to work long hours can arise, as it did for one associate, Ben Stewart, currently
a leader, when he was involved in a global project requiring him to spend large amounts of time
in the U.S. When a change in his home circumstances arose, Stewart evaluated the time he spent
travelling and reduced it significantly by using videoconferencing and conference calls. He adds
that his sponsor also encouraged him to travel less, and to take time off to compensate when he
does travel.
Outcomes
It is widely believed that Gore’s corporate culture which encourages a healthy worklife balance
directly contributes to the award-winning success the company has long enjoyed. John Kennedy,
a Gore leader and senior associate in Scotland in traditional, external business terms, underlines
this belief. He says, “Our culture and principles drive very high performance from individuals
and teams, who are empowered and results-oriented with a strong ‘can-do’ attitude.” Gillies
acknowledges that “sometimes it feels like it would be easy and certainly quicker to direct, but in
the long-term, we know that doesn’t work.” She is emphatic that “because we are not telling
people what to do and when to be here, there is more chance work is going to be done better.
Associates buy into what the company stands for, so the quality of input and decisions is better.”
For Stewart, one of the challenges facing associates is that it is “very easy to get caught up in the
positive environment and find yourself over-committing.” To counteract this, he notes that
“leaders, sponsors and associates need to understand each individual situation and act
appropriately.” Kennedy supports this position: “It can be easy to get caught up in an
environment of high energy and activity.” Gore’s approach to work-life balance contributes to its
repeatedly being included in Fortune magazine’s best companies list.
Way Forward
Continuing to develop associates is seen as central to sustaining the corporate culture and
principles that foster work-life balance at W.L. Gore.
Learning Points
When they are part of a clearly understood management style, work-life balance arrangements
can work without being supported by formal policies and procedures. Work-life balance can be
an integral part of a holistic management approach.
Organizations should focus on life issues for employees/associates and actively work on these as
well as work development to ensure the balancing of work and life.
Good leadership and mentorship are important to encourage employees to balance work and their
personal life.
Discussion Questions
1. What are the key elements in the corporate culture at W.L. Gore that may prevent employees
from taking advantage of there being no set work hours?
2. How would you describe the management style and management responsibilities in this
company?
3. What are some challenges employers may face when trying to implement W.L. Gore’s
distinctive approach to work-life balance in different countries of its operations?
4. What elements of this company’s approach to work-life balance could be adopted by other
organizations?
Answer the highlighted questions in APA format. Case Study Series on Work-Life Balance in Large
Organizations. Review the WL Gore Case and answer the questions. Expected word
count 500-700 words.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment