Criminal Psychology, writing homework help

User Generated

pwbr42

Humanities

Description

In this assignment, you will continue your examination of one of the following high-profile criminal cases

  • Andrea Yates.

In this assignment, the focus moves to the fact that all three used the insanity defense. One of the key aspects of these criminal cases involves the inclusion of psychological evaluations or diagnoses used during the criminal justice process.

Also, in this assignment, you will apply the facts as you have learned them from various resources to reach your own conclusions about the verdicts of these trials.

Instruction

In your paper:

  • Analyze how psychological assessments or evaluations were used in the criminal proceedings.
  • Describe your reaction to the court verdict and if you agree or disagree with the final disposition. If you agree, make sure that you thoroughly defend that position. If you do not agree, include what you believe would be the appropriate verdict and use appropriate critical reasoning.
  • Support your agreement or disagreement with examples from the offender's history, referring to course materials as well as a minimum of two external sources beyond the assigned articles. You may use journal articles, books, credible Web sites, and newspaper articles to support your explanation.

Additional Requirements

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

  • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards.
  • References: A minimum of three references.
  • Length of paper: 4–6 typed, double-spaced pages.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Title Page


Title



Name



Institution

Discussion


Brief background of the Andrea Yates case



Analysis of how psychological assessments were used in the case



Personal opinion of the court verdict



Personal argument why I agree with the court verdict



Support of the argument using the history of Andrea Yates

References
Fersch E. & Lapham E., (2005). Thinking about the Insanity Defense: Answers to Frequently
Asked Questions with Case Examples, Nebraska, NE: iUniverse.
‘History', (2009). Defense Rests in Andrea Yates Trial. History. Retrieved on May 2017 from
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/defense-rests-in-andrea-yates-trial
Huss M., (2008). Forensic Psychology, West Sussex, WE: John Wiley & Sons.


Running head: CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY

Criminal Psychology
Name of Student
Institution affiliation

0

Criminal Psychology
Criminal Psychology
The field of criminal psychology has undergone notable changes over time which have
revolutionized the role of criminal psychologists in the determination of cases. Usually, criminal
cases which involve an individual with questionable mental capability require a criminal
psychologist during the trial to aid in determining whether or not the perpetrator's actions were
stimulated by mental instability or whether they were sane at the time of committing the crime.
In history, there are many criminal cases where the defense used the insanity argument. On such
case is that of Andrea Yates in 2002 and her appeal in 2006. The objective of this paper is to
analyze the case with the objective of determining how psychological assessments were used in
the trial, describe my opinion to the two verdicts associa...


Anonymous
Excellent resource! Really helped me get the gist of things.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags