keystone xl, management homework help

User Generated

xunyvq3f

Business Finance

Description



Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines controversy explained


The Dakota Access Pipeline is a $4.8 million project by Energy Transfer Partners (EPT) which is extremely controversial coupled with a high degree of volatility. The final outcome of

this project will inevitability profoundly affect not only our economy, but possibly the global economy. Your assignment is to view the above video and research other related information.... and from a Marketing/Business Management Perspective, write a paper which focus on the rationales (Pros/Cons) for such an undertaking. Assuming you have the power.... what would you do. Your decision should be centered around (but not limited to) the following:

1. Incentives

2, Impact

3. Economic Benefits/Economic downfall

4. Social Responsibility

5. Business Ethics

6. Environmental Issues


9 page due 10th june.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

please find the attached file. let me know if you have any issue. i look forward to working with you again. good bye

Running head: DAPL

1

Dakota Access Pipeline
Name
Institution
Course
Tutor
Date

DAPL

2
Dakota Access Pipeline Project (DAPL)
Introduction
This is an 1886km underground oil pipeline in project in America. This project was

unveiled to the public in June 2014 following other numerous issues that followed it. The
Energy Transfer Partners project comprises of various key personnel such as Phillips 66,
Enbridge and Marathon Petroleum. This is one of the major historic projects that have been
associated with a lot of controversies. For example, there have been numerous concerns about
the implications of the project to the environment by a number of Americans who live in Iowa
and Dakota; who see the project being of detrimental impacts t the environment (Petroski, 2015).
Brief description of the project
This pipeline has been designed to carry over four hundred barrels of crude oil per day.
This capacity has been increased up to five hundred barrels. The estimated costs f the pipeline by
the relevant project managers was around $4.6 billion. The Energy Transfer Partners had a huge
estimation of the number of temporary jobs that were to be created by the project hence an
economic boost to America and the world at large (Petroski, 2015). The purpose of the project
was meant to aid in the outlet transfer of oil then later on distributed to other parts of the world.
There is a belief that this project would improve public safety and ensure that America is
independent in terms of energy. This pipeline runs from North Dakota Bakken (Bakken is the
original place of oil fields), crossing over fifty states in America.
Dakota Access Pipeline Project Incentives/economic benefits

DAPL

3
Initially, this project had stalled under the Obama administration but the actual

continuing process of project completion has been linked to a number of encouraging factors
(Petroski, 2015). There are various categories of people who are likely to benefit from the
project; driven by the fact that this is a huge oil pipeline project that was to have huge economic
implications in the United States of America and the globe at large.
President Donald Trump issued an official statement that this project is meant to create
over twenty five thousand jobs in the United States of America; a great boost to the economy of
the US. This is in conjunction with his campaign manifesto of making America Great Again and
‘employ an American’ philosophy. Another official statement from the owner is very clear that
this project would also create extra one hundred thousand jobs outside the United States of
America; being a huge incentive as to why the project was necessary to precede (Petroski, 2015).
The towns around the region of construction of the pipeline are likely to see huge blooms
of businesses; substantiated by the fact that there will workers staying in the lodgings, money
being spend on food and entertainment. This has already happened along the Dakota Access
Corridor; even though the business boom was temporary (Healy, 2016). The ability to create
these temporary jobs was the fuelling factor behind the implementation of the oil pipeline
project.
The ability to generate local tax revenue is another fuelling factor for the project. This
re...


Anonymous
Just what I needed…Fantastic!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags