InstructionsDevelop: Infographic or TimelineEvaluation Title: Kinds of Pop CultureAs media grows and changes, we incorporate the new forms of communications into popular culture. However, the previous communication methods continue to be used as well.Your assignment this week has two parts: First, you will create a timeline or infographic to address the following questions:Research and provide examples or comparisons that demonstrate these changes over time from each of the categories: Print, Radio/Music, Cinema, Television, and the Internet. Include images of each artifact.How have these various forms of communication have evolved since they were first introduced? (Give a “before” and “after”)Second, you will write a mini-statement answering the following question.In 300-500 words, give your opinion: Will pop culture ever stop using a form of media? Why or why not?Specifications:You will submit an Infographic or timeline in response to part 1 with an accompanying mini-statement to address part 2. Your infographic can be submitted as MS Word document or if you use an online infographic creator like the ones listed below you can submit your infographic as a URL. Your accompanying mini-statement can be included on your infographic or submitted separately as an MS Word document.Helpful tips:Here are a couple of perfect tools to use to create your infographic for this assignment! You can open a free account at https://venngag (Links to an external site.)e.com/ (Links to an external site.) or http://piktochart.com/ (Links to an external site.) to make your infographic.Prezi (Links to an external site.)would be a good tool to use for your infographic as well. Here’s a great example of a Prezi timeline template:RubricUnit 6 Assessment - Kinds of Pop CultureUnit 6 Assessment - Kinds of Pop CultureCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentHU340-CO1; HU340-CO227 ptsLevel 5Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.24 ptsLevel 4Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.22 ptsLevel 3Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.19 ptsLevel 2Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.16 ptsLevel 1Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions27 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P27 ptsLevel 5Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.24 ptsLevel 4Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.22 ptsLevel 3Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.19 ptsLevel 2Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.16 ptsLevel 1Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.27 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology15 ptsLevel 5Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.14 ptsLevel 4Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.12 ptsLevel 3Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.11 ptsLevel 2Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.9 ptsLevel 1Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting10 ptsLevel 5The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.6 ptsLevel 4The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.4 ptsLevel 3The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication2 ptsLevel 2The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.1 ptsLevel 1The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I6 ptsLevel 5In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.5 ptsLevel 4In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.4 ptsLevel 3In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 - 4 minor APA errors.3 ptsLevel 2In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.2 ptsLevel 1The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements0 ptsLevel 0There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.6 ptsTotal Points: 85

Hello, I need a case study done for my Psychology class, you have to read the following case study and form an opinion about whether you think this couple will stay together or not using information from your text. Develop your response, it should be 3 pages long. It has to be specific and use information from the text and at least 2 reliable outside sources (CITE AT THE END). I will attach 3 pages from the book to use on the paper as evidence and you could use up to 2 reliable outside sources. Make sure to cite any outside source at the end. PLEASE NO plagiarizing! Please let me know if you have any questions! Case study- Sarah and Dave, 24 year old college grads, have been in a relationship for a year and a half. Sarah lives in Chicago and Dave lives in New York. Sarah is an elementary school teacher in Chicago and Dave is a marketing rep for a pharmaceutical company. They have a lot of fun together—they both are runners and like to ride bikes, go to the theater and travel—and have strong physical attraction for each other. They are emotionally close as well. Sarah is politically very liberal and Dave is a conservative, so they avoid talking about politics. Dave and Sarah both have anxious attachment styles, and both of them had parents who divorced when they were in first and second grade. When under stress, Dave tends to turn his stress on Sarah and become critical, whereas Sarah tends to withdraw and avoid. Sarah wants Dave to move to Chicago so they can live together and eventually get married, which they both want, but Dave doesn’t want to leave his job how because he is concerned that the economy might get bad again.Outline of the paper...1. Take a position if they will or will not stay together. 2. Support that position. (AT LEAST 3 POINTS TO SUPPORT IT)3. Take the opposite position of what you chose and support that. (AT LEAST 2 POINTS TO SUPPORT THE OPPOSITE POSITION)4. Last, any information that you don’t have that would help you in predicting the outcome for the couples. (AT LEAST 2 POINTS TO SUPPORT)

Shintoism does not really focus on morality. It does not have a moral code. In other words, it is not concerned with how humans treat one another. It does, however, speak of how humans should live purely so that they may receive favor from the deities. So, in Shinto, the concern is that improper behaviors separate believers from the gods. Shinto doesn't care whether it separates them from each other.In an original 100-word post, what do you think of this and could it make a society hard to live in? {In another file,}The primary purpose for prayer in Sikhism is to thank God for past blessings and to seek blessings for future endeavors.In one 100-word original post - how does this compare/contrast with your personal beliefs about prayer?