Class/ Soc of Death, Dying and Grief "Integrative Essay : Formulate the materials covered so far--Illych, Ikiru, Bardo chapters, Tuesdays with Morrie, My Last Lecture, etc,--around a core theme making reference to the materials where appropriate. Be comprehensive but also precise. Use proper citation machinery and bibliography. 2-3 pages." < This is the exact requirement. Simply, Integrate all materials attached in a core theme, then address it. (you have to make the core theme)1- be comprehensive of the readings attached and films. 2- ASA format3- 3 pages FILMS: - Akira Kurosawa's Ikiru. - 20/20 Interview with Morrie Schwartz; Youtube; Randy Pausch- the last lecture. - Ivory Tower https://chapman.kanopy.com/

The scientific method allows us to pose questions, test questions, and analyze results. Through observation and research we begin to understand the world around us. Consider research you have read about or been a part of and analyze the following in one page:Was the Scientific method followed? How?What pieces were or were not part of it? (Randomization, study type, placebos, etc.)For the second part, present a research project you would like to propose in approximately one page.How can it help us learn about basic principles of behavior?How can you use the scientific method to find and address possible problems in your research design?This paper should be 2pages in length and use APA formatting (cover page, paper body formatting, citations, and references: see Rasmussen's APA guide in the Resources tab, or by clicking here . Prior to submitting your paper, be sure you proofread your work to check your spelling and grammar. If you use any outside sources, please site those sources in APA citation format.Grading RubricFFCBA01234Did not SubmitNo PassCompetenceProficiencyMasteryNot SubmittedNo identification of scientific method for identified research studyIdentifies scientific method, but lacks explanation of basic features.Identifies scientific method, but explanation is underdeveloped.Identifies scientific method, fully explains basic features.Not SubmittedNo identification of scientific method components.Identifies presence of scientific method components, but lacks specifics.Identifies some scientific method components.Identifies and fully explains scientific method componentsNot SubmittedDoes not propose research study.Proposes research study very briefly.Proposes research study and gives some specifics.Proposes research study and gives full detail and explanation.Not SubmittedNo basic principles identified.Attempts to identify basic principles with some supporting evidence.Attempts to identify basic principles with adequate supporting evidence.Thoroughly to identify basic principles with strong supporting evidence.Not SubmittedNo application of scientific method.Applies scientific method components, but lacks specifics.Applies scientific method components with adequate information.Applies scientific method components with excellent supporting information.

Thus far, you have learned how historical contexts, perspectives, and biases influence the interpretation and "telling" of historical narratives. For this discussion, reflect on what you have learned about your research question and the historical event and current event you chose. To ensure an interesting discussion, you are encouraged to think creatively about your initial posts and extend the points made by your peers. It is also important to review the module resources and read the prompts in their entirety before participating in the discussion. You should include examples and other supporting evidence from the module resources in your posts.Discussing challenges that face our world often means investigating opinions and ideas different from your own. Remember to remain thoughtful and respectful towards your peers and instructor in your discussion post and replies.Create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts. For your initial post, address the following: Discuss the brainstorming process you used to identify bias in your primary and secondary sources. How did you do it? Describe the strategies that were successful for you.Consider the challenges you encountered identifying the narratives about your historical event. What methods did you use to identify the absent voices in the historical narratives?What perspectives do you think are missing from the narrative about your historical event?Be sure to cite evidence from your sources to justify your points.For your response posts, address the following:How might you use your peers' strategies to uncover another absent perspective related to your historical event or expose a historical narrative bias? If you think you cannot apply your peers' strategies to your own event or narrative, explain why.