PHI103 Ashford University Social Media and Employment Law Paper

User Generated

12funhaqen

Humanities

phi103

ashford university

Description

This final assignment is designed to involve all of the main skills that you have learned during this course. In particular, your paper should demonstrate the ability to construct a deductively valid or inductively strong argument, clearly and accurately explain your reasoning, use high-quality academic sources to support the premises of your argument, fairly and honestly evaluate contrary arguments and objections, and identify fallacies and biases that occur within the arguments or objections presented.

You will continue to build on the arguments that you are presented in your previous two papers. In particular,, you will present a final improved version of your argument for your thesis that you begin for the Week One Assignment and fully address the objection that you developed for your Week Three Assignment. You will need to research a minimum of three scholarly sources from the Ashford University Library. (For further information about discovering and including scholarly research, take a look at the FindIt@AU Tutorial (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. instructional resource.)

Write: in your paper

  • Explain the topic you are addressing and your position on it. Provide a preview of your paper and a statement of your thesis in your opening paragraph. [Approximately 100 words]
  • Present your main argument for your thesis in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line.Clearly indicate whether your argument is intended to be inductive or deductive. Follow up the presentation of your argument by clarifying the meaning of any premises that could use some explanation. [About 150 words]
    • If your argument is deductive, then it should be valid (in the strict logical sense of the word); if it is inductive, then it should be strong. Make sure to avoid committing logical fallacies within your argument (e.g., begging the question). Additionally, the premises should be true, to the best of your knowledge. If one of your premises has a pretty obvious counter-example, then you should either fix the argument so that it does not have this flaw, or later, in your paper (steps three through five) you should address the apparent counter-example (showing that it does not really refute the truth of your premise). Arguments that are not valid, not very strong, commit fallacies, or that have counter-examples that are not adequately addressed will not receive full credit.
  • Provide supporting evidence for the premises of your argument. [Approximately 350 words]
    • Pay special attention to those premises that could be seen as controversial. Evidence may include academic research sources, supporting arguments (arguments whose conclusions are premises of the main argument), or other ways of demonstrating the truth of those premises. This section should include at least one scholarly research source.
  • Explain a strongobjectionto your argument. [Approximately 250 words]
    • Study what people on the other side of this question think about your reasoning and present the best possible objection that someone could have to your argument. Do not commit the straw man fallacy here. Reference at least one scholarlyresearch source. See the “Practicing Effective Criticism” section of Chapter 9 of the course text for more information.
  • Defend your argument against the objection. [Approximately 200 words]
    • Once you have presented the objection, indicate clearly how you might respond to it. It is acceptable to admit that reasonable people might disagree with you or that there might be an area in which your argument could be further strengthened, but you should do your best to explain why your argument is sound or cogent despite the objections.
  • Provide an appropriate conclusion. [Approximately 75 words]

For further instruction on how to create arguments, see the How to Construct a Valid DeductiveArgument (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and Tips for Creating an Inductively Strong Argument (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. documents as well as the Contructing Valid Arguments Video (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. For an example of a completed Final Paper, see the Annotated Example The Ethics of Elephants in Circuses (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Let your instructor know if you have questions about how to complete this paper.

NeedWritingHelp.jpg


The Final Argument Paper



User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

hello, I'm through with your work. please find it in the attached document.Am happy working with you.

Running head: SOCIAL MEDIA AND EMPLOYMENT LAW

Social Media and Employment Law
Name of Student
Name of Professor
Course Title
Date

1

SOCIAL MEDIA AND EMPLOYMENT LAW

2

Introduction
The ascent of social networking has significantly changed the route in which data is
obtained and utilized as a part of the working environment. Online networking incorporates types
of electronic correspondence through which clients make online groups to share data, thoughts,
individual messages, and other content. This incorporates Facebook, web journals, LinkedIn, and
Twitter. These locales can be utilized to create social and expert contacts, in addition to other
things. While clients of online networking can change the security settings for their profiles on
online networking destinations like Facebook so that just certain different clients can get to the
substance, this does not imply that the substance is fundamentally 'private'. Truth be told, the
courts have noticed that Facebook clients appreciate a moderately low desire of security when
they post material on the site.
Thesis- “The appearance of online networking has altered the way we impart as a general
public, and remote advancements permit us to do as such speedier than we ever suspected
conceivable. The lines in the middle of individual and expert personas have converged into an
indistinct dimness of preferences, connections, and posts, making straightforwardness a regular
issue.”
Arguments for thesis- Regardless the point that the subsidence delays, businesses are
beginning to hint at good faith as they contract once more. This is uplifting news for occupation
seekers; be that as it may, the way managers fill these positions is significantly more particular
than was found in the "war for ability" only 10 years back. Keeping in mind the end goal to settle
on the best contracting choice, bosses are looking a long way past the resume to take in more
about their candidates and workers including investigating their own person to person

SOCIAL MEDIA AND EMPLOYMENT LAW

3

communication destinations. This new pattern has propelled a web of legitimate issues that the
courts have quite recen...


Anonymous
Excellent! Definitely coming back for more study materials.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags