use the MORAL Decision-Making model to complete Learning Exercise, assignment help

User Generated

rguathz

Health Medical

Description

In a 2-3 page paper in APA format, use the MORAL Decision-Making model to complete Learning Exercise titled “A Nagging Uneasiness” in the course text (Marquis & Huston, 2014).

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Assignment 3 Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum. In a 2-3 page paper in APA format, use the MORAL Decision-Making model to complete Learning Exercise titled “A Nagging Uneasiness” in the course text (Marquis & Huston, 2014). Assignment 3 Rubric 0 points Points Earned Competency 16 points 10 points 6 points Massage the Dilemma Explains the data that needs to be collected about the ethical problem and specifies who should be involved in the decisionmaking process Describes some of the data that should be collected about the ethical problem and who should be involved in the decision-making process Poorly explains the data that should be collected about the ethical problem or does not say who should be involved in the decisionmaking process Values Clarification Examines and describes own values as the nurse in the case study Identifies possible values as the nurse in the case study No paper Poor description of submitted values of the nurse /16 and/or content in the case study missing Constructs alternatives, and analyzes Outline Options the causes and consequences of each identifies some alternatives, and analyzes some of the causes and consequences of each Names few alternatives, and does not analyze the causes and consequences of each No paper submitted /16 and/or content missing Review Criteria Weighs the Weighs few Identifies the No paper No paper submitted /16 and/or content missing /16 and Resolve Affirm Position and Act. Look Back options against the values of those involved in the decision Fully develops an implementation strategy. Evaluates the decision Competency of the options against the values of those involved in the decision options but does submitted not weigh against and/or content the values of those missing involved in the decision Implementation Describes an strategy is No paper implementation incomplete or submitted strategy. Simply missing. Evaluation and/or content describes the of the decision missing decision made made is incomplete 2 points 1 point /16 Points Earned 0 point 4 points Organization Organization excellent, ideas clear and arranged logically, transitions smooth, no flaws in logic. Grammar Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage correct and idiomatic, consistent with Standard American English Competency 5 points References Organization good; ideas usually clear and arranged in acceptable sequence; transitions usually smooth, good support. Organization minimally effective; Organization problems in does not meet /4 approach, requirements. sequence, support and transitions. Grammar, Grammar, Grammar, punctuation, punctuation, punctuation, mechanics, and mechanics and mechanics, usage good usage and usage mostly consistent distracting and interfere with with Standard often interfere with understanding /4 American meaning or English; errors do understanding not interfere with meaning or understanding 3 points References are Adequate relevant, 1 point Minimal use of appropriate Points Earned 0 point Poor use and/or /5 authoritative and contemporary. Competency APA Format 7 points Demonstrates competent use of mechanics and APA. references. 5 points Minimal APA errors. references. 2 points Many APA errors. selection of references not relevant. 0 point Complete lack of /7 understanding. Total Submission status Points Earned /100
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Please find attached, let me know if you need any clarification. Thank you.

Outline
I.

Introduction

II.

Conclusion

III.

References


Running head: MORAL DECISION- MAKING MODEL

Moral Decision-Making Model
Name
Institution

MORAL DECISION- MAKING MODEL
Moral Decision-Making Model
The moral decision making stereotype is a model that is deployed in making ethical
decisions by the incorporation of the fundamentals nursing biomedical morals or ethics with the
nursing process. The model is significant in the clarification and comprehension of the ethical
issues that emanate from obligations that are conflicting in nature (Marquis & Huston, 2014).
The decision approach comprises of five major steps which include the massaging of the
dilemma, outlining of the alternatives, reviewing the criterion and resolving, affirming position
and acting, as well as looking back to evaluate the alternative chosen. The a...


Anonymous
Awesome! Perfect study aid.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags