Victim, attacker, and probable motivation for the attack, science homework help

User Generated

XrivaFnintr

Science

Description

This assignment consists of two questions (below) to test your knowledge and assimilation of the course objectives. You are to pick ONE and answer it in 4-6- page essay. Grading will be based on the rubric. Make sure you follow AMU’s writing policies and the Turabian writing style guide (cover page, page numbering, double space, headings/subheadings, etc). The use of required texts and readings from this course is mandatory, but you may supplement with additional academic (credible) sources. YOU MUST CITE YOUR SOURCES AND INCLUDE A BIBLIOGRAPHY.


Essay Question #1: Select one of the studies presented in Case Studies I (Week 6 Lesson) or Case Studies II (Week 7 Lesson) or another case of your choosing with instructor approval. Write an analysis paper providing more details of the attack, to include the following:

a.Victim, attacker, and probable motivation for the attack.

b.Nature and sophistication of the attack.

c.What was the desired outcome of the attack?

d.How successful was it?

e.How effective were the attackers in covering their tracks?

f.How did the victim respond?

OR

Essay Question #2: Discuss the future of cyber warfare. Include the following as part of your discussion:

a.How future wars will be fought.

b.How ethical is cyber warfare?

c.How the United States is preparing defensively to counter cyber-attacks?

d.What is next?

General Requirements

1. Document Format.

a. MS Word document

b. One-inch (1”) margins

c. Times New Roman font

d. Twelve (12) pitch

e. Not including your title page, this assignment should be 4-6 pages.

f. The paper should be 4-6 double-spaced pages.

2. Citation Format: Turabian. As stated in the Academic Integrity Briefings, information taken directly from another source must be placed in quotations and cited following the Turabian format contained in the week one “lessons” folder. You must cite all other information from your sources, even if you do not quote directly. DIRECT QUOTING SHOULD BE KEPT TO A MINIMUM.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

APUS CLE: INTL440 DOO RAPUS RCampus - my cox ECO Secure https://rubric.apus.edu/gradeeditc.cfm?xsite=MainSite * : Rubric: INTL Undergraduate Research Paper Show: Descriptions Comments UG Research Paper 100% Powered by iRubric Introduction 10 % Focus & Sequencing 20 % Support 20 % Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning Did not attempt 4 pts 3.4 pts 3 pts 2.6 pts O pts Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning Did not attempt Strong introduction of topic's Conveys the topic and key Conveys the nature of the Does not adequately convey Incoherent introduction. No key question(s) and/or terms. question(s). Subtopics are topic, but does not present the topic to be assessed clear thesis statement, no Clearly explains subtopics to explained, and general thesis the key question(s) to be Does not describe any research question presented be reviewed. Thesis is made. assessed. Describes the relevant subtopics, lacks an statement is clear and in subtopics and makes a adequate thesis statement accordance with the spirit of general thesis statement the assignment which requires additional clarity Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning Did not attempt All material clearly related to All material clearly related to Most material closely related Little evidence material is Severely lacking focus and main topic and subtopics. Sub , to the main topic and logically organized into topics, clarity throughout. Paper demonstrates strong logically organized within subtopics. Material may not subtopics, or related Presentation of ideas lacles organization and integration subtopics. Clear, varied be organized within the components. Many transitions smooth transitions and ideas of material within the transitions linking subtopics subtopics clearly. Attempt to are unclear or nonexistent. jump from concept to concept different topic areas. Strong and main topic. provide a variety of without a clear link. Ideas transitions present linking transitions, bulletted rather than written subtopics, and main topic. as a narrative Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning Did not attempt Strong peer-reviewed Sources well selected to Sources are generally Few sources supporting No references incorporated research based support for support thesis with some acceptable but not peer- thesis. Sources insignificant thesis. All claims are backed research in support of the reviewed research (evidence) or unsubstantiated. Fails to up by scholarly references. thesis. Most all sources are based. References Wikipedia meet minimum required Use of required sources from the scholarly literature. or other unreliable websites source expectations. exceeds expectations. Use of required sources meets expectations. Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning Did not attempt Strong review of key Strong review of key Review of key conclusions. Does not summarize evidence No clear conclusion provided. conclusions. Strong conclusions. Strong Some integration with thesis with respect to thesis integration with thesis integration with thesis statement. Discusses the statement. Does not discuss statement. Insightful statement. Discusses impact impact of the researched the impact of research discussion of impact of the of researched material on the material on the topic material on the topic research material on the topic topic presented. presented. presented presented Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning Did not attempt The paper is free of Grammatical errors or A few grammatical, spelling, Grammatical errors or Not written at the college grammatical errors, spelling spelling and punctuation or punctuation errors are spelling and punctuation level. errors and punctuation errors are rare and do not made and interfere with the substantially detract from the errors detract from the paper, reading of the paper, paper. Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning Did not attempt No errors in Turabian writing Minor errors in Turabian Errors in Turabian writing Errors in Turabian writing Turabian writing style not style are made. Scholarly writing style are made, but style are noticeable Word style detract substantially used within paper. Writing is writing is maintained they do not detract from the choice occasionally uses an from the paper. Word choice choppy and unclear. throughout. Writing is flowing paper. Scholarly writing style informal tone of voice. Writing is informal in tone. Writing is Referencing and citation and easy to follow. All is maintained throughout has a few awkward or unclear choppy, with many awkward errors severely detract from references and citations are Writing has minimal awicward passages. Two references or or unclear passages. the presentation of the paper correctly written and present. or unclear passages. One citations are missing from the References and citation errors reference or citation missing paper or references list. detract significantly from the from paper or reference list, Errors are made on the paper. or errors are made on source references list. list. Conclusion 10 % Grammar & Mechanics 20 % Writing Style and Communication 20 %
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Please find attached.Thank you.

Outline
I.

Introduction

II.

Conclusion

III.

References


Running head: THE FUTURE OF CYBER WARFARE

The Future of Cyber Warfare
Name
Institution

THE FUTURE OF CYBER WARFARE

2

The Future of Cyber Warfare
How future Cyber warfare will be fought?
Cyber warfare is one of the controversial issues that have been traumatizing most
organizations and countries over the past decade. The term cyber warfare has been connoted by
various researchers in many ways. The broadest connotation of the word is the invading and
defending of information found in the computer networks while limiting the potential of an
adversary to engage in such activities (Dipert, 2013). Most of the individuals perceive that cyber
warfare only deals with the attack on the information in the computers. Nonetheless, cyber
warfare also entails interfering with the information systems to alter the political statements to
influence the political outcomes.
It is anticipated that the future cyber warfare will be prevalent by most governments,
organizations, particular interest groups, and civilians. Moreover, it is expected that the next
cyber war may target not only the military agencies but also the Wall Street, and the main streets
will also be impacted by the future cyber warfare (Dombrowski and Demchak, 2014) .Besides, it
is expected that the US army will be affected on drastically following the future warfare.
Principally, this is because the conduction of the future cyber warfare w...


Anonymous
Really helped me to better understand my coursework. Super recommended.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags