Administrative Law Assignment

User Generated

jnerntyr31

Business Finance

Description

PURPOSE: To support your arguement with administrative law.

INSTRUCTIONS:

  1. Find and read the case Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976).
  2. Find and read the case Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970).
  3. Take a position as to whether the Supreme Court was correct in not extending the Goldberg hearing requirement to disability and unemployment benefits.
  4. Use the cases you have found (and any other you choose) to support the position you have taken.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Here you go buddy.

Surname 1
Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course Details
Date
Administrative Law
Two different Supreme Court cases; Mathews v. Eldridge and Goldberg v. Kelly shed
some light regarding the way the due process acts in safeguarding from arbitrary denial of legal
rights by the government. As preserved in the Fourth Amendment, the Due Process Clause
outlines the necessity of evidentiary hearing if there emerges a situation where the government
opts to deny someone welfare benefits. By and large, it dictates the foundation, principles, and
stipulations under which the law should...


Anonymous
Just what I needed…Fantastic!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags