I have to write an essay on How does the environment affect us. Please help me think of things to write in it. I mostly need help with things like introductions for a paragraph and endings for it.  

I need this Excel workpaper & paper done by Saturday 2pm MST.APA 7 is required for all sources used and cited.Please review all attached details for Lab instruction, as well as grading rubric and requirements noted.Please see attached files.OPTION #2: DashboardsYou are required to complete both parts A and B. Part A:Complete Lab 5-2 Create a Dashboard Based on a Common Data Model (pp. 217 – 219) in your textbook. Part B:1. Your analysis should be written as an essay and should include the following:IntroductionAnalysisHeadings - Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 (i.e., Part 1: Identify the Questions) – headings are shown in the Lab.Communicate your findings to the Board of Directors and then write a brief paragraph of your analysis in layman’s terms. (For example, what were the key findings from your analysis?)Conclusion.2. Submit your analysis as a Word document and submit any additional requirements noted in the Lab (i.e., Excel files, tables, etc.).undefinedCSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.)undefinedCSU Global Library (Links to an external site.)undefinedRubricACT480 Mod 5 CTACT480 Mod 5 CTCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements20 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationIncludes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.16 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationIncludes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.12 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationIncludes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.8 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceIncludes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent20 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.16 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.12 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.8 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis15 to >12.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProvides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.12 to >9.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.9 to >6.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.6 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples5 to >4.0 ptsMeets ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.4 to >3.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.3 to >2.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSources or examples don't meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.2 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceSource or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course are clearly deficient.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.5 to >4.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.4 to >3.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationProject is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.3 to >2.0 ptsBelow ExpectationProject is poorly organized and does not follow proper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.2 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceProject is not organized or well written and is not in proper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style.5 to >4.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than one significant error.4 to >3.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationFew errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than two to three significant errors.3 to >2.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with four to five significant errors.2 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with more than five significant errors.5 ptsTotal Points: 70PreviousNext