Description
Submit these documents to the underlined assignment link above:
- Final Draft
- separate Multimodal Component
- Multimodal Analysis
- Revision Analysis
You can upload them as separate files or as one combined file - just make sure the various parts are clearly distinguished.
ATTACK IS PROJECT 2 ROUGH. KINDLY TAKE NOTE OF THE PROFESSOR COMMENTS AND BUILD ON IT FOR THE PROJECT 2 FINAL DRAFT
RUBRIC
Audience | Points Range:0 (0%) - 10 (4.55%) - The target audience – a decision-maker in the writer’s local community or current/future career – is identified - Writing adapted to the audience effectively - Audience-based reasons and evidence used - Style and form appropriate for the audience used |
---|---|
Introduction: Problem and Thesis | Points Range:0 (0%) - 20 (9.09%) - Gets reader’s attention - Describes the problem and its causes - Persuades the audience that this is a serious problem (in his/her local community or current/future career) that needs solving - States his/her claim/thesis (solution to the problem) clearly |
Alternative Solutions | Points Range:0 (0%) - 20 (9.09%) - Describes 2-3 alternative solutions used/suggested previously by others - Explains (with support) their drawbacks |
The Best Solution and Justification for the Solution | Points Range:0 (0%) - 35 (15.91%) - Describes his/her solution that will help alleviate the problem in detail - Develops 2-3 reasons (in separate paragraphs) why the audience should implement the solution - Explains and presents evidence that the solution is logical, feasible and practical, and why it is the most effective one available for the writer’s local community or current/future occupation |
Counter-Arguments | Points Range:0 (0%) - 25 (11.36%) - Summarizes 2-3 arguments, challenging the solution, reasons, and evidence - Shows (with support) weaknesses in opposing views and refutes them effectively |
Conclusion and Call to Action | Points Range:0 (0%) - 20 (9.09%) - Offers a convincing call (that the specific decision-maker could act on) to implement the solution proposed - Leaves a strong last impression |
Integrating Sources | Points Range:0 (0%) - 20 (9.09%) - Sources attributed properly and incorporated into the text effectively - Academic and credible sources selected; writer's reasoning for source choice is apparent - Sources summarized, paraphrased, or direct-quoted when appropriate (used a minimum of 5 citations) |
Citation and Documentation | Points Range:0 (0%) - 10 (4.55%) - In-text citations and References page adhere to APA guidelines - Project formatted according to APA guidelines |
Conventions | Points Range:0 (0%) - 20 (9.09%) - Topic sentences, concluding sentences, and proper transitions used - Grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors corrected - Writing flows well |
Multimodal Component | Points Range:0 (0%) - 10 (4.55%) - Illustrates the argument (problem, solution, and justifying reasons) succinctly and effectively - Offers a call to action - Design choices and rhetorical decisions are thoughtful and support the audience and purpose of the paper - For the ad/flyer, the writer has considered layout (organization of and balance between the written and visual text), spacing, font and image size, font type, color, clarity, and brevity of the argument - For the video PSA, the writer has considered quality of voiceover commentary and audio. Considered technical quality (accessibility and viewability), audience engagement, timing (less than a minute), and completeness |
Multimodal Analysis | Points Range:0 (0%) - 20 (9.09%) - Explains and justifies design choices in relation to the local or occupation-specific audience - Discusses use of the rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, logos) - Reflects on the utility of composing in different media and how he/she might apply these skills in different areas of his/her life |
Revision Analysis | Points Range:0 (0%) - 10 (4.55%) - Synthesizes the feedback received through multiple channels - Discusses how feedback was applied and reasons for making the revisions |
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
Here is the updated paper. I rewrote a lot of it to make sure it fit the requirements. Also, make sure you update the title page before turning it into the professor.James
Running head PAY FOR SUCCESS IN CUYAHOGA COUNTY
Pay for Success in Cuyahoga County
Name
Professor Names
University Name
1
Running head PAY FOR SUCCESS IN CUYAHOGA COUNTY
2
High levels of poverty in Cuyahoga County have created a significant population
of homeless. While homelessness is an unacceptable condition for any human being, it is
more so for children and young adults. According to the Northeast Ohio Coalition for the
Homeless, there were over 2,646 children living in unstable housing conditions or were
homeless in 2016 ( 2016). To combat the problem of homeless children, several social
programs have been implemented in Cuyahoga County. However, the funding for these
programs is typically inadequate, and many of these programs are not held accountable
for results. Therefore, I propose to you, the Cuyahoga County Executive, the use of
private-public partnerships, in particular, the Pay for Success program, to fund all social
programs that deal directly with improving the lives of homeless children.
The funding of social programs has always been difficult. To successfully
implement a social program, the process requires money and a force of administrative
workers. In most cases, partnerships are formed to develop a successful social program.
Programmatic partnerships are usually made up of two or three organizations, which are
focused on dev...