This discussion will provide you with the opportunity to examine two companies to determine which company’s mobile commerce is more effective.For your initial post, consider Amazon and eBay and how Amazon sells products while eBay sells and auctions products. Revenue generated by both companies is done via m-commerce. Which company do you think is most effective in terms of m-commerce? Which has the least number of steps to complete a purchase (micro to macro conversion)? Use evidence and research to support your thinking.In responding to your peers, state whether you agree or disagree with their thinking. Why or why not? Use evidence to support your rationale.Refer to the Discussion Rubric for directions on completing these discussions.

Developing a code of ethics is a way for a company to share its core values and practice ethical business. For example, the National Association for Healthcare Quality has formulated a code of ethics that can be found at https://nahq.org/about/code-of-ethics (Links to an external site.).Think about a company or organization you currently work for or do business with. Find the code of ethics for the company or organization and post the link for the class.Using the code of ethics you found, give an example that you are familiar with in which the company has stayed true to the code of ethics and demonstrated ethical business practices.Discussion Grading Rubric - 25 ptsDiscussion Grading Rubric - 25 ptsCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post Content7.0 ptsAddresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.5.0 ptsAddresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.3.0 ptsAddresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s), applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.0.0 ptsMinimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).7.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInitial Post Evidence & Sources4.0 ptsIntegrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons, AND at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited.3.0 ptsIntegrates evidence to support discussion from assigned readings OR online lessons. Sources are credited.2.0 ptsIntegrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson. Sources are credited.0.0 ptsDoes not integrate any evidence.4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollow-Up Post 14.0 ptsResponse furthers the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.3.0 ptsResponse furthers the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.2.0 ptsResponse does not further the dialogue significantly; adds little depth to the discussion.0.0 ptsDoes not respond to another student or instructor.4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollow-Up Post 24.0 ptsResponse furthers the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.3.0 ptsResponse furthers the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.2.0 ptsResponse does not further the dialogue significantly; adds little depth to the discussion.0.0 ptsDoes not respond to another student or instructor.4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Communication4.0 ptsPresents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).3.0 ptsPresents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).2.0 ptsPresents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).0.0 ptsPresents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).4.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness of Responses1.0 ptsStudent posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.0.0 ptsStudent does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.1.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFrequency of Responses1.0 ptsPosts in the discussion on two different days.0.0 ptsPosts fewer than two different days OR does not participate at all.1.0 ptsTotal Points: 25.0