the knowledge management report is a communities of practice

Anonymous
Category:
Writing
Price: $235 USD

Question description

Project One: Communities of Practice Report

Team Project

Worth 17 points, Due in Week 3

The Knowledge Management report is a Communities of Practice (CoP) Evaluation Report.

The purpose of writing the Communities of Practice Evaluation Report is to provide you with exposure to the social process of becoming a knowledge practitioner. Writing the report will provide the social context of an individual being integrated as a part of a community in pursuit of a common practice. The collective social practice ties individuals together but also helps shape an individual's view and interpretation of the community, language and culture.

Outcomes Met With This Assignment:

  • describe knowledge management trends, cultural impacts, and communities of practice in order to support organizational success;

NOTE: All submitted work is to be your original work. You may not use any work from another student, the Internet or an online clearinghouse. You are expected to understand the Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism Policy, and know that it is your responsibility to learn about instructor and general academic expectations with regard to proper citation of sources as specified in the APA Publication Manual, 6th Ed. (Students are held accountable for in-text citations and an associated reference list only). Serious sanctions can result from violations of any type of the Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism including a zero on an assignment, a zero for the course or dismissal from the university.

Instructions:

In this short report, you will research and observe a community of practice related to knowledge management. Acceptable communities can be found blogging on professional topics, within social media, or as a group within an organization.

Write the Introduction

Create the introductory paragraph. The introductory paragraph is the first paragraph of the paper and tells a reader the main points covered in the paper. To help you know how to write an introduction, view this website to learn how to write an introductory paragraph: http://www.writing.ucsb.edu/faculty/donelan/intro.html

Required Elements to include in the Communities of Practice (CoP Evaluation Report):

  • Identify the industry/organization that CoP is focused on;
  • Discuss the type of community of practice (CoP);
  • Discuss how the CoP is relevant to knowledge management;
  • Briefly discuss the nature of issues and topics discussed within the CoP;
  • Discuss how the CoP adds value to the industry/organization.

Write the summary paragraph

Write the summary paragraph. A summary paragraph restates the main topics of the paper. Make sure to leave a reader with a sense that the paper is complete. The summary paragraph is the last paragraph of a paper and does not need a heading.

Review the Paper

Read the paper to ensure all required elements are present. Use the grading rubric to ensure that you gain the most points possible for this assignment.

Proofread the paper for spelling and grammatical issues, and third person writing.

  • Read the paper aloud as a first measure;
  • Use the spell and grammar check in Word as a second measure;
  • Have someone who has excellent English skills to proof the paper;
  • Consider submitting the paper to the Effective Writing Center (EWC). The EWC will provide 4-6 areas that may need improvement.

Submit the paper in the Assignment Folder (The assignment submitted to the Assignment Folder will be considered a student’s final product and therefore ready for grading by the instructor. It is incumbent upon the student to verify the assignment is the correct submission. No exceptions will be considered by the instructor).

========================================================

Before you begin writing the paper you will read the following requirements that will help you meet the assignment requirements.

  • Read the grading rubric for the assignment. Use the grading rubric while completing the assignment to ensure all requirements are met that will lead to the highest possible grade.
  • Third person writing is required. Third person means that there are no words such as “I, me, my, we, or us” (first person writing), nor is there use of “you or your” (second person writing). If uncertain how to write in the third person, view this link: http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/first-second-and-third-person.
  • Contractions are not used in business writing, so you are expected NOT to use contractions in writing this assignment.
  • You are expected to paraphrase and NOT use direct quotes. You are expected to paraphrase, which can be learned by reviewing this link: https://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/QPA_paraphrase2.html.
  • You are responsible for APA only for in-text citations and a reference list.
  • The expectation is that you provide a robust use of the course readings to support ideas, reasoning and conclusions. This means that you present an idea and then use the course readings to back up what you presented. Stringing one sentence after another using the course readings does not meet the requirement and does not demonstrate critical thinking. Critical thinking is demonstrated when they “why and how” and the “who and what” are thoroughly explained.
  • You may not use books as source material.
  • When using a source document, the expectation is that the information is cited and referenced with a page or paragraph number. Note that a reference within a reference list cannot exist without an associated in-text citation and vice versa.

How to Set Up the Paper

Create a Word or Rich Text Format (RTF) document that is double-spaced, 12-point font. The final product will be between 2-3 pages in length excluding the title page and reference page. You are expected to write clearly and concisely.

Follow this format. Consider making an outline to ensure the correct headings are in place and to keep you organize the paper.

  • Title page with title, your name, the course, the instructor’s name; date
  • Introduction that includes identification of the industry/organization that CoP is focused upon - One paragraph
  • Community of Practice Type
  • CoP Relevancy to Knowledge Management
  • Nature of Issues and Topics Discussed within the CoP
  • Added Value of CoP to Industry/organization
  • Summary paragraph - One paragraph

Hide Rubrics

Rubric Name: Written Assignment (17%)

Criteria

demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions

(5.355 - 5.95)

shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions

(4.76 - 5.354)

shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion

(4.165 - 4.75)

shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draw unwarranted conclusions

(3.57 - 4.164)

lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims

(0 - 3.56)

arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implication and extensions of the material and concepts

(5.355 - 5.95)

arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate student’s understanding of the material and concepts

( 4.76 - 5.354)

arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material

(4.165 - 4.75)

arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material

(3.57 - 4.164)

a meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas does not exist

(0 - 3.56)

demonstrated full understanding of requirements; responded to each aspect of assignment

(2.296 - 2.550)

demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment

(2.05 - 2.294)

demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment

(1.54 - 2.04)

failed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment

(1.275 - 1.53)

did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements

(0 - 1.274)

writing is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability

(1.54 - 1.7)

most ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issues

(1.37 - 1.53)

wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar

(1.2 - 1.36)

unclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issues

(1.02 - 1.19)

largely incomprehensible writing/poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure

(0 - 1.01)

no APA style errors

(0.766 - .85)

attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present

(0.69 - .765)

attempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document

(0.596 - .68)

attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other

(0.51 - .595)

no attempt at APA style

(0 - 0.50)

Overall Score

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Studypool Tutor
School: UIUC
PREMIUM TUTOR
Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1829 tutors are online

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors