Persuasive Paper Refer to the illustrative case study, Helton, et al. v. Glenn Enterprises, Inc., No. E2005-00103-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 26, 2006.

User Generated

natvrcb

Business Finance

Description

Refer to the illustrative case study, Helton, et al. v. Glenn Enterprises, Inc., No. E2005-00103-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 26, 2006. Write a persuasive paper on your perspective of the given case study. You will tell why you agree or disagree with the outcome, your reasoning, and support your perspective using supporting evidence in the form of established precedents, similar cases in other districts, scholarly writing, or other applicable research and studies.

  • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to APA (6th edition) style and formatting.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
  • Length: 700 to 1100 words demonstrating learning, research, and analysis.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running Head: PERSUASIVE PAPER

1
Persuasive Paper

Student Name:

Professor Name:
Course Name &Number:
University:
Paper Due Date:

PERSUASIVE PAPER

2

Introduction
In the Helton, et al. v. Glenn Enterprises, Inc case, the trial court’s verdict was directed
for the defendant with the jury holding that there lacked liability based on the evidence presented
by the plaintiff. However, based on the evidence presented by the plaintiff, I do not consent with
the jury’s verdict on the argument for lack of sufficient proof of liability. Ordinarily, a business
does not have the duty to protect its customers against criminal acts perpetrated by third parties
on its premises (Martin, Bates & McMyne, 2015). The business cannot be regarded as the insurer
of the customer’s safety and lacks the absolute duty of putting in place security measures to
protect the customer. However, all businesses have the obligation of putting in place reasonable
steps to safeguard the customers in cases where criminal activities by third parties against the
customers are reasonably foreseeable. In order for the criminal acts to be considered reasonably
foreseeable, the entity must have observed, known, or have reason to know based on the past
experience. In the Helton, et al. v. Glenn Ente...


Anonymous
Excellent resource! Really helped me get the gist of things.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags