Unit 2: DiscussionNo unread replies.No replies.IntroductionLeadership StylesSkill development is an integral portion of leadership development. It is important to recognize your personal style of leadership. This style affects how others respond to you, how they respond to their work, and, in the end, how effective you are as a leader. As such, Chapter 3 explores theories of motivation, and leadership styles. Chapter 4 examines task and relationship-oriented behaviors determining leaders’ success and explores personal styles of leadership (Northouse, 2021).Unit Learning OutcomesAnalyze theories of motivation (CLO 2).Differentiate leadership styles (CLO 2).Assess your leadership style in various contexts (CLO 1).DirectionsReview the unit resources and assigned chapters. Answer the discussion questions and submit for review. Primary post is due by Wednesday (11:59 pm, CST). Respond to at least two peer postings. Peer postings are due by Friday (11:59 pm, CST). Your peer responses should: State if you share their perspective.Explain your perspective on the issue.Support your perspective with reasoning or justification.Please be sure to use supporting material from the chapter to strengthen your discussion and justify your answers. There is no length limit; however, you should answer each question thoroughly.Discussion EtiquetteYou should consider the discussion threads as being analogous to the kind of discussions typical of a face-to-face class: strive to be yourself, have a voice, and to say things that are interesting, provocative, and respectful.Since this is an educational setting, you are encouraged to proofread, and to avoid the more slang- and emoticon-fueled discourse that appear on social media.One of the goals here is professional preparation; if you would not say or do something in the workplace, then you should not post similar material in a discussion thread.Due DateFirst post due 11:59 p.m., Wednesday CTRespond to two or more classmates by 11:59 p.m., Friday, CT.Discussion QuestionsFor Unit 2, you will address the following tasks in one discussion post (Primary Post):Chapter 3 – three opening questions and one additional question of your choice.Chapter 4 – two opening questions and one additional question of your choice.Critical Thinking – Complete activity and share your findings.Chapter 3Chapter 4Critical ThinkingChapter 3What is your personal philosophy of leadership? Why?What are your beliefs about human behavior?Can basic assumptions about people change? How?Choose one of the following additional questions to answer:How are our attitudes about the nature of work formed? How can they be changed?What are the potential downsides of authoritarian, democratic, and laissez-faire styles of leadership?What sort of leadership (authoritarian, democratic, laissez-faire) do you prefer as a follower and why?What is the line between authoritarian leadership and abusive leadership?How can a follower resist the coercion of an abusive leader?How easy is it to change one’s preferred style of leadership?Is it reasonable to expect that individuals might exhibit “Theory X behavior” in one setting and “Theory Y behavior” in another? If so, how might that affect your style of leadership?Chapter 4When working with others, do you focus more on the task or relationships with those you’re working with? Why?Which is more important to you, task leadership or relationship leadership?Choose one of the following additional questions to answer:Do you agree that task- and relationship-oriented leadership behaviors lie along a continuum? Why or why not? Where would change behaviors fit along this continuum?Do you believe that one orientation (task or relationship) is more effective than another? Why?How can you tell what leadership style would be most effective with a given group?To what extent do your traits contribute to your preferred leadership style? How easy is it, then, to change your leadership style when needed?Do followers have preferences regarding how they are led? If so, what does that mean for leaders? How might they take that into account in determining leadership behaviors?Is it more important to be comfortable with your leadership style or to adapt to the circumstances? Explain.Critical Thinking DiscussionThe Bully BossFind and read an online article on abusive managers, such as this one from Forbes magazine: 6 Effective Tactics for Handling a Toxic Boss (Links to an external site.)Conduct your own web search for an example of an abusive authoritarian leader, such as a coach, business executive, influential celebrity, teacher, politician, etc. From the research you found, answer the following questions: How did this person cross the line into using influence for selfish reasons or to coerce followers to engage in unethical activities?For part of the peer responses determine if there are any similarities in the leaders’ stories?How can followers effectively resist destructive leadership like this?PLEASE CITE YOUR ANSWERS

IntroductionA case study analysis requires that you investigate a business problem, examine the possible and/or alternative solutions, and propose the most effective solution using supporting evidence.Read and examine the case carefully.Focus on the issues/problems.Brainstorm possible solutions or changes that need to be made.Select the best solution with reasoning.Unit Learning OutcomesExamine the concepts important to defining leadership (CLO 2).Explain key traits for effective leaders (CLO 2 and CLO 4).Case Summary - 1.2 Charity: WaterScott Harrison, a former nightclub influencer, transitioned from a life he described as being polluted with drugs and alcohol, to work with humanitarian efforts. From working with humanitarian efforts, Harrison realized that he could make a difference in the world by assisting those less fortunate. Harrison’s work with Mercy Ships provided him the opportunity to create his own charity. Charity: Water with the mission of providing clean drinking water for the 1 billion people in their world without access to it.Harrison created a four-pronged plan including: (1) guaranteeing donations would directly finance clean water projects, (2) using GPS devices to provide visual evidence that the donations were directly impacting the areas where they said they were, (3) marketing with a positive message focusing on hope, opportunity, and fun, and (4) connecting with local organizations and stakeholders to sustain the organization. Harrison’s success has led to a successful charity and successful organization that is making real and measurable change in communities around the world.DirectionsRead the full case study in the textbook: Case 1.2 - Charity Water.Answer the case study discussion questions.Submit your work for review. Case Study QuestionsWhat leadership traits account for Scott Harrison’s success?How would you describe Scott’s Leadership abilities?Leadership includes administrative skills, interpersonal skills, and conceptual skills. In what ways does Scott Harrison exhibit each of these skills?Case Study RequirementsFull points will be earned if the case study(s):responds to every aspect of the assignmentcontains fully developed answersdisplays a familiarity with the related materials and topics being referencedExhibit the ability to apply the related concepts to the case study.Each question warrants a response that is well developed and is well-formatted.At least one page in length, typed, and double spaced.All cited material must include both internal citations and a complete reference list at the end of the paper.Due DateSubmit by 11:59 p.m., Sunday, CT.RubricCase Study RubricCase Study RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues or Problems10.0 ptsExcellentIdentifies and understands the main issues in the case study.9.0 ptsProficientIdentifies and understands most of the main issues in the case study.7.0 ptsSufficientIdentifies and understands some of the main issues in the case study.5.0 ptsDevelopingIdentifies and understands few of the main issues in the case study.3.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryDoes not clearly identify main issues in the case study.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch and Review10.0 ptsExcellentExcellent research with clearly documented associations and links between problems or questions and key course concepts.9.0 ptsProficientSatisfactory research with documented associations and links between problems or questions and key course concepts.7.0 ptsSufficientLimited research with documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts.5.0 ptsDevelopingIncomplete research with documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts.3.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryLittle or no research with documented associations between problems or questions and key course concepts.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis Solution Options10.0 ptsExcellentInsightful and thorough analysis of all the key issues. Alternative solutions/options cover all the key issues with descriptive well-reasoned and logical discussion.9.0 ptsProficientInsightful and thorough analysis of most all the key issues. Alternative solutions/options cover most the key issues with well-thought out reasoning and logical discussion.7.0 ptsSufficientInsightful and thorough analysis of some of the key issues. Alternative solutions/options cover some of the key issues with solid reasoning and discussion.5.0 ptsDevelopingDeveloping analysis of the some of the key issues. Further development is needed. Alternative solutions/options cover few of the key issues with minimal reasoning and discussion.3.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryIncomplete analysis of the key issues. Incomplete solutions/options without sound reasoning or discussion.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Organization Format10.0 ptsExcellentWriting is free of grammar and spelling errors. Clear, concise, and creative presentation of ideas. Organization is effective. Sources are identified and in APA format.9.0 ptsProficientWriting is mostly free of grammar and spelling errors. Most ideas are clearly presented. Organization is effective. Sources are identified and in APA format.7.0 ptsSufficientWriting contains several spelling or grammatical errors. Some ideas are clearly presented and organized. Sources are identified with errors in APA format.5.0 ptsDevelopingWriting contains many errors with grammatical mistakes. Ideas are difficult to follow. Sources are not identified or errors in APA format.3.0 ptsUnsatisfactoryErrors in grammar and spelling distract from the overall message. Ideas are incomplete. APA format was not used correctly.10.0 ptsTotal Points: 40.0PreviousNext