This assignment provides you with an opportunity to summarize ethics in financial responsibilities and to evaluate ethical considerations of executive compensation by writing a persuasive essay. In your essay, take a position on the following topics, and support it with evidence. Evidence can be facts, statistics, and quotes from scholarly articles, reliable news BBA 4751, Business Ethics 4 sources, or even anecdotal examples from personal experience. You may use any of the readings from this course, or you may find new ones to support your position. At least two pieces of evidence should be used (one for each topic). Do you think executive compensation in its various parts (i.e., salary, stock options, severance packages) funded at the current level is unethical? If so, how would you revise the compensation so that it was just? On what basis would you change it? Does the government have a role to play? If so, in what manner? Is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act too strict, not strict enough, or just right? Explain. Your essay should be at least 500 words in length, double-spaced, and written in Times New Roman, 12-point font. Use APA Style to format your citations.

I just need 1 page . Please follow directions For each reading assigned for class, choose at least one sentence, quote, and/or idea that resonates with you and write briefly about it. This ″writing briefly″ could involve, for example, explaining why an idea resonates with you, how this connects to something that you are already familiar with or that has crossed your mind before, and/or what about the reading is confusing or troublesome. These are not the only ideas for writing briefly about daily readings -- just a few to get you started. Also: Instead of adding blank lines between responses to different readings, use paragraph breaks or a bulleted list.Specific assignments to write about in DW1 (so all four of these)The TWO chapters from the Meeting 1 PDF, i.e.:a. ″Writing About Writing: A History″ by Bird et al. ANDb. ″Threshold Concepts as a Foundation for ′Writing About Writing′ Pedagogies″ by Wardle and Adler-Kassner (in Meeting 1 PDF)″Preface″ to Naming What We Know, Classroom Edition (the preface in the other edition is different, so be sure to reference the Meeting 2 PDF to access this short chapter)Introduction: Coming to Terms″ (Yancey) in Naming What We Know. daily pieces should fill at least a full typed, double-spaced page + one line on a second page, without adding wonky text features to make papers look longer. these are NOT assigned as summaries). You do not need to use formal citation in these. I need someone who will do a good job .

Explanations and Theories of the Salem Witchcraft TrialsIn Topic #2, we looked at the origins and events of the Salem Witchcraft Trials in 1692. This fascinating episode from colonial history served as a great cautionary tale about community fears and the experience of living through the damaging effects of a "witch hunt." Still today, historians, authors and the general public still probe for answers as to why this event happened in Salem Village.In this discussion, write two (2) posts where you address any of the following three questions about the Salem Witchcraft Trials or a reply to another student. Your two posts may be answering two of the three questions OR one post that answers one of the three questions and then a reply to another student. Therefore, after your initial post answering one of the three questions, you choose what you want for your second required post - answer to another question or reply to a student. Before writing your 1st post, if you have not already done so, watch and take notes from the online lecture “Colonial New England in the 17th Century" to learn the historical background of colonial New England and the Salem Witchcraft Trials. Then open the Word file found also in the Discussions module that contains articles on the Salem Witchcraft Trials. They are “The Afflicted Girls of Salem Village” by Kathy Weiser and “The Theory That May Explain What Was Tormenting the Afflicted in Salem’s Witch Trials" by Nik DeCosta-Klipa. Read these articles to help decipher reasons for the afflicted girls’ physical symptoms and reasons they accused other villagers of being witches. Understanding the content of these articles are necessary to help formulate your post.Here are the questions you can address:In general terms, what do you believe are the strengths and shortcomings of ascribing medical explanations to long ago historical figures whom present-day doctors cannot directly diagnose? Do you believe with brilliant insight, it can be effective? Or is at best hit and miss? Or do you believe it to be completely flawed? Can for example, modern-day doctors accurately diagnose if the afflicted girls of Salem Village suffered from stress, epilepsy, ergot poisoning or delusional psychosis?Provide your interpretation why the girls exhibited their physically symptoms and accused others in the community of being witches. Did they appear bored and were looking for attention? Did they appear to be malevolent and vengeful in their accusations? Did they appear really to believe they were under the spell of witches? Did they appear to be acting out in a stressful or repressive environment? Or do you believe this is something unknowable and why? Provide your best support and insight to the position you decide to take incorporating if you like from Kathy Weiser’s brief biographies of the afflicted Salem Village girls.After reading the central ideas to Nik DeCosta-Klipa’s “mass conversion disorder” theory, do you believe this disorder may be a compelling reason to explain the afflicted girls’ behavior? Why or why not? Build your position by looking at the evidence and support DeCosta-Klipa provides or, if you choose, point out any flaws or shortcomings in his article.Here are your instructions and criteria for this Discussion Board:You must have two (2) separate posts. Each post is worth five (5) points each for a total of 10 points for Discussion Board #1.Provide insightful and well-reasoned support in your posts. Show serious reflection of thought. Each written post should be between 75-150 words. You may write more, but don't be excessive; don't write less than this word minimum; this word range should be enough to develop your ideas concisely.Remember don't copy and paste material from the internet. Your posts must be your own original writing.Keep in mind that you must post first before seeing other classmates' posts. To begin your post, point and click on Reply and a text box will appear. Then after you have reviewed what you written, then you can click Post Reply. Then you'll be able to read your classmates' posts.Remember to follow the rules of civility and proper academic conduct in your posts. Avoid vulgarity, rudeness, and insensitive language. You may disagree with someone in a reply, but be respectful. And above all else, DO NOT PERSONALLY ATTACK anyone for their views.You may write as many posts as you like, but the maximum points for Discussion Board #1 is 10 points.