This assignment focuses on the individual behavior and processes that affect innovation in an organization.Watch the video ‘IDEO shopping cart project’ (see link below) and write a summary of the attributes in IDEO organization that encourage and enhances innovation in an organization. Make sure you include your own critical thinking on the subject matter. The paper needs to have an introduction and a conclusion section with a clear thesis.***Link for the video IDEO Shopping Cart Project***

DescriptionIn this speech, you will provide an analysis of a cultural artifact ( the use of baseball in Puerto Rico) using public identity as a critical lens. Your goal in this speech is to explain to your audience the basis for your critical judgment about the artifact.This speech should last at least, but no more than, 6–8 minutes. You will be given a 15-second grace period on either end. This time limit is not a suggestion. It is a requirement, and points will be deducted if you go over or under the time limit.InstructionsThe object you analyze ( the use of baseball in Puerto Rico) should be well known or easily shown to your audience. Your analysis should focus on claims made by the artifact on the audience in terms of the issue of public identity (race/gender/orientation, citizenship, or public memory). Additionally, your speech should inform us about the context of the artifact by presenting sufficient historical and cultural background for the audience in class. Ultimately, you should be presenting a clear and thoughtful argument about the object as something that can be understood as a material instance of rhetoric. This argument should not be limited to whether the object was merely aesthetic, functional, or in conversation with community standards, but should judge it according to the criteria of how it—intentionally or not—persuades someone to think, to act, or to believe in specific ways. Were the purposes of the object (assuming it had an intended purpose) fulfilled by its persuasive stance or contradicted? What were the consequences or potential impact of the artifact? Were the principles behind it valid?This assignment will rely on logos. Logos is one of the rhetorical proofs that lead to judgment by the audience. Logos is based on evidence and reasoning, language, and structure. Your analysis, given in a speech, will demonstrate how you use criticism as a form of civic engagement. What you believe to be the persuasive dimensions of the cultural artifact will demonstrate that you know how to be a critic involved in public life, that you know how to do criticism that is engaged in civic matters, and that this functions in ways that are important for the good of the public.Provide support for your speech by drawing on what others say about the artifact or about artifacts like it: include a minimum of six published sources cited orally in the speech, cited in the outline for your speech where you use them, and listed in the outline bibliography / Works Cited page. Four of the six sources must be scholarly (edited, peer-reviewed) publications. Journalistic sources, news-aggregators, and general web pages are not scholarly sources, but they can be used to provide factual information, historical background, or pertinent cultural characteristics and uses. The artifact you analyze is not a source: it is the object of your analysis. The textbook for this course is not a source: it is your guide for preparing your speech. Your instructor can be an invaluable resource in developing your perspective: ask your instructor for suggested scholarly readings that will help you conduct your analysis. Remember, your purpose is not merely to provide facts in an informative speech, but to use these facts to argue persuasively for the perspective that you are taking.Keep in Mind… The full sentence, preparation outline for your speech is worth 40 points. We have provided an outline shell that will help you structure the body, introduction, and conclusion for your speech. The outline should be completed as a Word document and submitted here when you submit your video. The speech, as it is presented in the video you submit, is worth 160 points. Also review the evaluation criteria established by CAS for the assessment of all speeches. The time frame for completing and submitting your presentations is indicated on the course schedule. Cultural Commonplaces Speech Outline Cultural Commonplaces Speech Outline Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome General purpose Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence outline 2.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Specific purpose Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence outline 2.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction: Attention getter Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence outline 3.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 3.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction: Personal credibility Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence outline 3.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 3.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction: Thesis Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence outline 3.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 3.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction: Preview Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence outline 3.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 3.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Body: Claim A/#1 Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence outline 3.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 3.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Body: Transition from Claim A/#1 to Claim B/#2 Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence outline 2.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Body: Claim B/#2 Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence outline 3.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 3.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Body: Transition from Claim B/#2 to C/#3 Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence outline 2.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Body: Claim C/#3 Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence outline 3.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 3.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Body: Transition from Claim C/#3 to Conclusion Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence outline 2.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion: Call to action, summary, closure Rhetorical Situation Speech full sentence outline 4.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar, spelling, punctuation, format, & citations 1 point deducted for each mistake in any of these areas (not to exceed 5 points total) 5.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 5.0 pts Total Points: 40.0

Assessment 3 Instructions: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Content Print For this assessment you will create a 2-4 page plan proposal for an interprofessional team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue you identified in the second assessment. The health care industry is always striving to improve patient outcomes and attain organizational goals. Nurses can play a critical role in achieving these goals; one way to encourage nurse participation in larger organizational efforts is to create a culture of ownership and shared responsibility (Berkow et al., 2012). Participation in interdisciplinary teams can also offer nurses opportunities to share their expertise and leadership skills, fostering a sense of ownership and collegiality. Demonstration of Proficiency Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health. Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by the plan. Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes. Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to improving patient or organizational outcomes. Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature. Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals. Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan. Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes. Communicate the interdisciplinary plan with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style. Reference Berkow, S., Workman, J., Aronson, S., Stewart, J., Virkstis, K., & Kahn, M. (2012). Strengthening frontline nurse investment in organizational goals. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(3), 165–169. Professional Context This assessment will allow you to describe a plan proposal that includes an analysis of best practices of interprofessional collaboration, change theory, leadership strategies, and organizational resources with a financial budget that can be used to solve the problem identified through the interview you conducted in the prior assessment. Scenario Having reviewed the information gleaned from your professional interview and identified the issue, you will determine and present an objective for an interdisciplinary intervention to address the issue. Note: You will not be expected to implement the plan during this course. However, the plan should be evidence-based and realistic within the context of the issue and your interviewee's organization. Instructions For this assessment, use the context of the organization where you conducted your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific patient or organizational outcome or objective based on the information gathered in your interview. The goal of this assessment is to clearly lay out the improvement objective for your planned interdisciplinary intervention of the issue you identified. Additionally, be sure to further build on the leadership, change, and collaboration research you completed in the previous assessment. Look for specific, real-world ways in which those strategies and best practices could be applied to encourage buy-in for the plan or facilitate the implementation of the plan for the best possible outcome. Using the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX] will help you stay organized and concise. As you complete each section of the template, make sure you apply APA format to in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that inform your plan, as well as the reference list at the end. Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score. Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes. Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan. Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature. Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements described in the plan are not made. Communicate the interdisciplinary plan, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style. Additional Requirements Length of submission: Use the provided template. Remember that part of this assessment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 2 to 4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan. Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.Leadership Robert Johnson Wood Foundation. (2014). Preparing nurses for leadership in public policy [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/articles-and-news/... This blog post examines ways to prepare nurses to be leaders in public policy advocacy, creation, and defense.