Objective: The students will complete a Case study assignments that give the opportunity to synthesize and apply the thoughts learned in this and previous coursework to examine a real-world scenario. This scenario will illustrate through example the practical importance and implications of various roles and functions of a Health Care Administrator. The investigative trainings will advance students’ understanding and ability to contemplate critically about Experimental Study Designs, Measures of Effect, Data interpretation issues, and their problem-solving skills. As a result of this assignment, students will be better able to comprehend, scrutinize and assess respectable superiority and performance by all institutional employees. ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES (10%): Students will critically measure the readings from Chapters 8 to 10 in your textbook. This assignment is planned to help you examination, evaluation, and apply the readings and strategies to your Health Care organization and Managerial Epidemiology. You need to read the article (in the additional weekly reading resources localize in the Syllabus and also in the Lectures link) assigned for week 4 and develop a 3-4 page paper reproducing your understanding and capability to apply the readings to your Health Care organization and Epidemiology. Each paper must be typewritten with 12-point font and double-spaced with standard margins. Follow APA style 7th edition format when referring to the selected articles and include a reference page. EACH PAPER SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: 1. Introduction (25%) Provide a short-lived outline of the significance (not a description) of each Chapter and articles you read, in your own words that will apply to the case study presented. 2. Your Critique (50%): Case Study “Gastroenteritis following a retirement party at the State Capitol” 1 Outbreak Summary Approximately 300 persons attended a retirement party at the Nebraska State Capitol held on May 27, 1999. Most of the attendees worked in the Capitol. A private caterer (Caterer A) prepared and served food for the reception. Based on initial telephone interviews of persons reporting illness, the predominant symptoms were nausea and diarrhea, and the incubation period was approximately 24-30 hours. The following foods were served at the retirement reception: Swedish meatballs, taco dip, crab dip, a vegetable tray and herbed ranch dip, cake, nuts and mints. The vegetable tray consisted of cucumbers, broccoli, cauliflower, carrots, celery, green peppers, and radishes. All foods were prepared onsite on the day of the reception with the exception of the nuts, which were purchased by a coworker, and the mints, which were made by a coworker. The Swedish meatballs consisted of ground beef, ground pork, sour cream and flour. The meatballs were cooked twice. The taco dip contained layers of cream cheese mixed with salsa, ground beef, tomatoes, lettuce, onion, cheese and salsa. The taco dip was prepared manually by Caterer A in the kitchen at the State Capitol, and was not cooked after assembly. The crab dip contained canned real crab, cream cheese and ketchup. The investigators received completed surveys from 227 attendees. Of those 227 attendees, 128 (56%) persons reported a gastrointestinal illness within 72 hours of the reception. The average interval between time of food consumption and onset of illness was 32.3 hours (range 6 to 67 hours). Table 1 shows the symptoms reported by ill attendees. The duration of symptoms generally lasted 24 to 36 hours. One person reported being symptomatic for five days. Eight persons sought medical treatment, mostly for re-hydration therapy. Persons working in the security office at the State Capitol ate samples of the items served at the reception except the taco dip. None of the people from this office reported illness. Table 1: Distribution of Symptoms Reported in Persons Meeting the Case-definition. Symptom Number (%) Nausea 117 (92.9%) Diarrhea 111 (88.1%) Abdominal Cramps 92 (74.2%) Vomiting 90 (72.0%) Headache 87 (70.7%) Chills 73 (59.8%) Muscle aches 72 (59.5%) Sweats 67 (55.4%) Bloody diarrhea 0 (0%) CASE STUDY CHALLENGE 1. What were the main finding in the case study? 2. What are the Conclusions from these findings? 3. What are the increased risk for people to get gastroenteritis? 3. Conclusion (15%) Fleetingly recapitulate your thoughts & assumption to your critique of the case study and provide a possible outcome for the Managerial epidemiology and this case study.How did these articles and Chapters influence your opinions about study designs? Evaluation will be based on how clearly you respond to the above, in particular: a) The clarity with which you critique the case study; b) The depth, scope, and organization of your paper; and, c) Your conclusions, including a description of the impact of these Case study on any Health Care Setting.

PJM410 MOD5 Peer Discussion ResponsesPlease reply to both POST1: and POST2: in at least 250 words. I have included the original post and references only to assist you in the responses.Original post:What does it mean to document risks? How will you do this throughout a project? Walk us through the life of a risk in your project and describe when and where you would document risk events? POST1:Documenting a risk is a very important step in risk management that gathers information on the risk and keeps records of it from start to finish. There are a lot of risk that could come up so performing risk management is vital to the success of this project. In each phase of the project whether risk planning, risk identification, performing qualitative or quantitative risk analysis, performing risk response, implementing the risk plan and monitoring the risk, risks will be documented and regularly updated throughout the project. Which will help guide and lead the project to success. If a family is going on vacation to Disney World. There apparent risks that can be associated with the trip’s success. Documenting will help with current and future risks to know what the risks are and what actions to take per risk and should be done throughout the project. Documentation can be done by using assumption logs, milestone lists, lesson learned register, risk register, risk report, stakeholder register, and more (PMI, 2017).In the case of a family taking a trip to Disney World, let’s go through and see where documenting would look like. To identify risks, one may brainstorm all the activities that the family wants to accomplish, what transportation is going to be used, where they will be staying, what they will be eating. An assumption log or a risk breakdown structure maybe created to determine what the potential risks maybe. For instance, if they decide to rent a car and stay off site then they will have to pay for parking at the parks and fight for parking daily. Performing a qualitative and quantitative risk analysis would help to document what kind of impact and what priority the risk maybe and what direction to take the risk. For instance, by using a decision tree analysis, the family may find out that staying off site is more expensive than staying at one of the Disney resorts and taking advantage of the Disney transportation. The plan risk response may include a lesson learned register or a risk register that will then identify what strategies will happen for the risks. In this case the family mitigates from staying off site to staying onsite to help them save money. With the last steps to implement and monitor.Resources: PMI, (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (6th ed.). Project Management Institute. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania.POST2:Class,Risk is a factor in any project. Identifying areas of risk and creating meaningful plans to mitigate or avoid risk is a key factor in project management. The documentation of risk allows for the preplanning of a response if the risk occurs, including how to react to it, who is going to react to it, and potentially budgeting to pay for the risk reaction.This should occur throughout the project as new risks are discovered. Damion Thomas (2018) cites ensuring that risk analysis is happening daily as a way to ensure that projects do not miss risk. In doing so, the project maximizes the potential to safeguard against risk.Creating a risk register is one way that Stephanie Ray describes staying on top of risk by gathering risk-related information. This includes the nature of the risk, the level of risk, who owns the risk, and potential mitigation measures.Working on software development, there is a need for revision as we introduce new content that overlaps existing content and changes its expected behavior. Steven Hendershot (2018) is correct in asserting that every upgrade project needs to start with a thorough risk analysis. Changes like this sort of content introduction can create a lot of risk as we need to ensure that the code content that is being altered still meets its desired function.Frequently, this can be caught in the planning phases of the project. When this happens, the risk is noted and the stakeholders it affects are made aware. However, this does occur during the production phase of the project. When this happens, the risk is called out, the PM and stakeholders made aware, and risk mitigation planned if needed.Thanks,BenReferencesHendershot, S. (2018). Past is prologue: When organizations upgrade legacy it systems, teams must root out the hidden risks. PM Network, 12(12), 36–45. Retrieved from https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/legacy-it-sys...Ray, S. (2017). Guide to using a risk register. Retrieved from https://www.projectmanager.com/blog/guide-using-ri...Thomas, D. (2018) Protective measures: We asked the project management community: How do you make sure your project team doesn't miss any threats to project success? PM Network, 32(7), 20–21. Retrieved from https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/avoid-threat-...