Creating lesson plans that align the English Language Proficiency (ELP) Standards and content standards is a requirement of educators who have English language learners in their classrooms. Among the most important aspects of English language development are the integration of language instruction and practice across the content areas, which includes differentiation of instruction to address specific learning needs of all students. These aspects can be accounted for directly within lesson plans. Part 1: Lesson Plan  create a lesson plan for integrated English language development (ELD) instruction that integrates ELLs’ cultural values and beliefs. Using the "COE Lesson Plan Template,” address the following: Using your clinical field experience classroom as the context for planning the lesson, select the grade level and at least one of the 10 Arizona English Language Proficiency (ELP) standards. In addition, select an English language arts (ELA) standard that aligns with the ELP standard. Complete all sections of the lesson plan template, focusing specifically on aligning objectives, instruction, and assessments to the ELA and ELP standards selected. Include both ELA and ELP standards within the "National/State Learning Standards" section of the template. Differentiation should address ELLs’ language differences, giftedness, and special education needs. Part 2: Reflection Write a reflection explaining how your lesson plan integrates ELLs’ cultural values and beliefs in the context of teaching and learning. Include a description of how your lesson planning and focus would be different, if you were to develop a targeted ELD lesson, instead of the integrated lesson you designed.

Option #1: Anti-discrimination LawsDiscrimination is an issue impacting today’s workforce. Discrimination can occur due to race, gender, sex, religion, and so forth. For this assignment, you will discuss two anti-discrimination laws. Organize your paper in this manner:Section 1: Introduction. In this section, you will discuss the current landscape of workplace discrimination. Specifically, identify recent statistics about discrimination in the workplace.Section 2: Anti-Discrimination Employment Law 1. Describe the first anti-discrimination law (e.g., history, strengths and weaknesses of the law, and application of the law in today’s workforce).Section 3: Anti-Discrimination Employment Law 2. Describe the second anti-discrimination law (e.g., history, strengths and weaknesses of the law, and application of the law in today’s workforce).Section 4: HR’s Role in Enforcing Laws. Evaluate the role of the HR Department in regard to enforcing the discrimination laws you selected.Section 5: ConclusionAdditional requirements:Write a 3-5-page paper, or about 1100 words, not including the title and reference pages, which are required.Your paper must be properly cited and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.).Include a formal reference page. This is an individual paper; however, you should reflect on our discussion forums and incorporate ideas from there, as appropriate.You must support your analysis with at least three scholarly references and can include resources from this course.The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources. You cannot use Wikipedia or any CSU-Global assignment. For this assignment, a credible source is defined as:A scholarly or peer-reviewed journal article.A government-based website or publication.A trade or industry journal article, publication, or website, including those from trade organizations such as SHRM.org and TD.org.HRM445 Mod 3 CTHRM445 Mod 3 CTCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements15.0 to >12.0 ptsMeets ExpectationIncludes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.12.0 to >9.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationIncludes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.9.0 to >6.0 ptsBelow ExpectationIncludes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.6.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceIncludes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent30.0 to >24.0 ptsMeets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.24.0 to >18.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.18.0 to >12.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.12.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis25.0 to >20.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProvides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.20.0 to >15.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.15.0 to >10.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.10.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.25.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples10.0 to >8.0 ptsMeets ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.8.0 to >6.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.6.0 to >4.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.4.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceSource or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.10.0 to >8.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.8.0 to >6.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationProject is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.6.0 to >4.0 ptsBelow ExpectationProject is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.4.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceProject is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style10.0 to >8.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.8.0 to >6.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationFew errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.6.0 to >4.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.4.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.10.0 ptsTotal Points: 100.0