World War II opinions in the US Supreme Court case Korematsu vs US

User Generated

Zvxrbszr

Humanities

Description

Everything must be cited with MLA NOT APA

Read the following document, which contains the concurring and dissenting

opinions in the U.S. Supreme Court case Korematsu vs. U.S. Answer the following questions: In writing the dissenting opinion of the Supreme Court decision in Korematsu v. U.S., Justice Murphy concluded by stating “. . . All residents of this nation are kin in some way by blood or culture to a foreign land. Yet they are primarily and necessarily apart of the new and distinct civilization of the United States. They must be treated accordingly at all times as the heirs of the American experiment and as entitled to all rights and freedoms as guaranteed by the Constitution.” Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not? Does this statement apply to any present-day situations?

PRIMARY SOURCE DOCUMENT

Executive Order 9066 Internment of Japanese-Americans

http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=74 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Korematsu vs. U.S. Concurring and Dissenting Opinions

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/323/214/case.html (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hello, Please let me know if you want me to add anything else in it.

After reading the statement, I can say that I agree with the statement. First, a word about
terms. When I speak of “racism," I am referring to attitudes, habits, and institutional practices
that manifest a deep bias against people of another race because of their race. I mean by ...


Anonymous
Just what I needed. Studypool is a lifesaver!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags