The Constitution is the framework for the organization of the United States government and for the relationship of the federal government with the States, citizens, and all people within the United States. The Constitution has been amended twenty-seven times, the last occurring in 1992. Of the twenty-seven Constitutional amendments, which one is most important related to evidence? Why? There is obviously no wrong answer, so your analysis in support of the amendment you choose is key.

Please follow the instructions belowRead Case Activity: Unlikely Coalitions Fight New York over Soda Ban. Answer the questions. Make sure to specifically quote concepts from the chapter.In the Assignment Submission area, click Write Submission to type your response, or copy and paste your response directly into the screen. You may also click Browse My Computer to attach a file containing your response.Case Activity: Unlikely Coalitions Fight New York over Soda BanNew York Mayor Michael Bloomberg railed against sugary soft drinks and the New York City board of health banned large servings. A New York Supreme Court Justice later invalidated the regulation. The city government faced unlikely foes in this case.Hispanic and African American civil rights groups, health advocacy organizations, and small businesses opposed the ban. Some filed briefs to support overturning the ban. They claimed it was discriminatory, paternalistic, and ineffective, according to the New York Times. The newspaper investigated the relationship between the civil rights and advocacy groups and the soft drink industry. It reported that groups, including the National Hispana Leadership Institute, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the National Puerto Rican Coalition and the National Hispanic Medical Association, had benefited from millions of dollars given by the soft drink industry to sponsor conferences, scholarships, and financial literacy classes.“A lot of these organizations have particular niches that they use to service the communities,” Gus K. West told the Times. West is president of the Hispanic Institute, a policy advocacy organization that supports tighter regulation of sugary drinks. “And they’re getting funded by the soda industry. They’re taking the money and looking the other way on obesity, diabetes, heart disease. They look the other way or issue statements that have no teeth or don’t go after the industry.”Pepsico denied any link between charitable giving and public policy. Katelyn Jackson, a spokeswoman for Coca-Cola, told the Times, “The suggestion that our community philanthropic efforts are motivated by something other than good-will is grossly inaccurate and ignores our history of true partnership for well over a century.” In fact, Coca-Cola introduced an antiobesity campaign that called for nutritional labeling and a pledge to stop advertising targeting children.Soft drink executives said that black and Hispanic nonprofit groups were helpful partners in contesting unwanted regulations and taxes. “It’s important to have all impacted parties out there so we can educate lawmakers and the media about the impact bans would have on our business,” Christopher Gindlesperger, a spokesman for the American Beverage Association, told the Times.What do you think of the soft drink industry’s stance or position? If you were public relations counsel for Pepsi or Coca-Cola, what would you recommend regarding this conflict?

Several authors have warned of the perils of misaligning products, customers and supply chains (Fisher,1997; Christopher and Towill, 2002 and others) as failure to do so can lead to a loss of competitive advantage caused by degraded customer service levels, surplus inventory, escalating costs and declining profits or poor return on assets (Lee, 2002) Fisher’s seminal paper “What Is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product?” published in Harvard Business Review in 1997, outlines the steps that a company should take to develop an effective supply chain strategy by understanding the nature of demand for their products, with products being classified as either functional or innovative. Building on Fisher’s work Christopher and Towill (2002) devised a supply chain taxonomy that incorporates a Top-Up Agile pipeline which combines Lean and Agile approaches. Subsequently many researchers have produced numerous examples of product and market (customer) driven segmentation to underpin supply chain strategy design and selection. You are asked to do the following: Provide an academic review of literature which critically discusses the evolution of supply chain strategy design and selection. The contemporary argument is made more complex in relation to the type of supply chain an organization has, by the vulnerability of that supply chain set against the technological developments which are changing the landscape of how supply chains operate and are managed. The 5 papers listed below must be included in your review. All are accessible via the University Library search engine Discovery. You are also required to select an additional 4 key contemporary papers to include in your review. You are required to critically evaluate how and why supply chain strategy selection taxonomies have evolved and developed in the academic literature since the publication of Fisher’s paper in 1997. You must discuss different supply chain strategies AND the range of taxonomies and criteria used to design differentiated supply chain strategies. Do not cite literature pre-1997. You will need to write concisely and avoid including irrelevant discussion. 5 core references: 1. Christopher, M. & Towill, D. R. (2002) ‘Developing Market Specific Supply Chain Strategies’. The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 13, pp. 1-14. 2. Fisher, M. L. (1997) ‘What Is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product?’ Harvard business review, Vol. 75, pp. 105-116. 3. Godsell, J., Diefenbach, T., Clemmow, C., Towill, D. & Christopher, M. (2011) ‘Enabling supply chain segmentation through demand profiling’. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 41, pp. 296-314. 4. Godsell, J., Harrison, A., Emberson, C. & Storey, J. (2006) ‘Customer responsive supply chain strategy: An unnatural act?’ International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, Vol. 9, pp. 47-56. 5. Lee, H. L. (2002) ‘Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties’. California management review, Vol. 44, pp. 105-119. Page 2 of 2 Please read and follow these instructions carefully: • Your essay should be between 1300 and 1600 words. The word count excludes figures, tables, table of contents, reference list and appendices. You will be penalized 10% if you go over or under the word limit. • You should offer a brief introduction and conclusion to your essay. Do not introduce any new information in the conclusion. • Your essay does not require either an abstract or an executive summary. • You MUST use the Harvard Referencing style. Your essay should include relevant journal papers only. • Use 11 or 12 point font (Calibri, Arial or Times New Roman are all acceptable), with 1.5 line spacing. • This coursework accounts for 20% of the final course mark.