Description
Read the Remy case study. What is your opinion on how procedural law impacted the outcome in this case? Which of the participants (examples: judge, defense attorney, prosecutor, or jury) do you believe bears the most responsibility for the ultimate outcome?
Part 2
There are two class mates papers below attach at the bottom. Please read them and make a separate page for each classmate with their names on it so I want get confused, answering the following: In your responses to classmates, respectfully challenge the opinion of your peers using facts that support your assertion.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
hello buddy here is the file. Have a look at it. If there are corrections you want done please inform me am ready to work on them. Thank you!
NAME OF STUDENT
NAME OF TUTOR
COURSE
DATE
REMY CASE STUDY
Remy was a violent and psychotic spoilt rich kid who had the power of law in his pocket, the law
always seemed to bend to his side in that the judge would always regard all evidence brought to
him as circumstantial and the only proof of a crime was in the witnesses statements and they
were not available which led to him dismissing the case. Remy would use witness intimidation
and manipulation to make sure that they do not testify against him which is in clear violation of
the l...