please complete the work given in documents which is simple task please follow apa with references and need on time

IT Consulting ProposalFor this assignment, assume you have been hired by Kris Corporation as an Information Technology consultant. Kris Corporation manufacturers parts for the automotive industry. Your job is to submit a proposal that meets their criteria (listed below) based on information provided. You may fill in any gaps in the specifications provided by making assumptions. All assumptions should be clearly identified.Current Implementation and Concerns:Parent domain (kris.local) and child domain (corp.kris.local) for the organization’s AD infrastructure are running on Server 2012. The following are concerns related to AD: (1) Kris Corporation is concerned about running multiple domain, and (2) automobile manufacturers are asking Kris Corporation to use single identity to procure orders in real time.The company has five locations: Atlanta (GA), Baltimore (MD), Chicago (IL), Seattle (WA) and San Diego (CA). The manufacturing plants are in Atlanta and Seattle.Disaster recovery is a big concern.Physical space for servers is an issue at the Atlanta location.Most of the IT staff is in Atlanta, which is the company’s headquarters, but other locations have significant IT personnel as well. Business personnel are similarly distributed across the company’s locations.Since all locations are independently connected to the internet, file sharing is difficult among sites.Your document should integrate the content presented in the course. The outline below provides required points to cover. You are free to add other related information.Describe the technical and business reasons for each choice, citing other resources as appropriate. The Windows Server 2012 operating system should be used for all aspects of the solution. Each choice should be explained with technical and business reasoning. Solutions should be reasonably detailed.Your solution should cover the following five numbered areas and associated bulleted items listed under each.Active DirectoryWhy and how should the company migrate to 2016 AD?Should the company remain at multi-domain model or migrate to single domain?What technology can provide single sign on? How will it be configured?DNSWhere should DNS servers reside?What kind of DNS security can the DNS servers leverage?DHCPWill a form of DHCP fault tolerance be implemented?How can DHCP addresses be tracked?Hyper-VEvaluate the pros and cons of implanting Hyper-V. Would it need clustering?What features of Hyper-V can Kris Corporation leverage?Routing/SecurityHow can Kris Corporation improve its networking capabilities in terms of file sharing and security?Submission Requirements:The final submission should provide 8-10 pages in length (not counting title page, images, diagrams, tables, or quotations).Support your proposed solution by citing and integrating at least one credible source that is not LabSim and not Wikipedia. Recommended sources include a best practice guide or reference from Microsoft, or an experienced provider of Microsoft solutions.At least one diagram must be included (not counted toward the minimum length described above). You may include more.Use terms, evidence, and concepts from class readings.Your paper must be formatted according to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements (Links to an external site.).If you need assistance with your writing style, start with the links under the Research Help and Writing Help tabs on the CSU-Global Library’s (Links to an external site.)RubricITS430 Mod 8 PPITS430 Mod 8 PPCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of migrating to 2016 AD; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.8.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationThe Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationThe Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationThe Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.8.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceThe Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis40.0 to >32.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProvides strong or adequate thought, insight and analysis of concepts and applications regarding migration to 2016 AD.32.0 to >24.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.24.0 to >16.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.16.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate thought, insight and analysis.40.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation40.0 to >32.0 ptsMeets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in network enterprise solutions.32.0 to >24.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.24.0 to >16.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.16.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.40.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Source Material20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationSources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor problems with selection and linkage of sources.8.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceSource selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSmall number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way, does not conform to project requirements.12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way, does not conform to project requirements.8.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceProject is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Style20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationStrong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSmall number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationInconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.8.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidencePoor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style20.0 to >16.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.16.0 to >12.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationFew errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.12.0 to >8.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.8.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.20.0 ptsTotal Points: 200.0Previous