Evaluation of plan effectiveness criteria

Anonymous
timer Asked: Jan 6th, 2018

Question description

Week 10 Project - Submit Files

Capstone Project

Evaluation of Plan Effectiveness Criteria

You spent the last two weeks implementing a portion of the comprehensive care plan you developed for the aggregate. An evaluation of plan effectiveness is now due.

In the evaluation component of the Capstone project, you are expected to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention.

Some questions you should seek answers to are:

  1. What barriers might you anticipate when implementing the intervention as planned?
  2. What visible signs of success would you look for (for example, reduced health issues)? Describe them.

The evaluation component of the final paper should describe your evaluation of the implementation. Include responses to points 1and 2 above. The evaluation component of the final Microsoft Word submission document should be a minimum of 2 pages.

The complete summary document should use the Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track (MAP-IT) steps used in pulling together your project.

Over the past nine weeks, you selected an aggregate and conducted a risk assessment of its health, developed a care plan to address those health risks, planned an implement one intervention in a small group from the aggregate, and considered the effectiveness of the intervention on the health of the small group. It's time now for you to present your final submission of this Capstone project.

Your final submission comprises the documentation of the work accomplished through your Capstone project, a Microsoft Word Document that contains the evaluation and summary, a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation highlighting the main aspects of the project including the key things learned during the 10 weeks of working with this project.

The summary document should use the Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track (MAP-IT) steps used in pulling together your project. The complete documentation of the work accomplished over the course of the project should contain a minimum of 6–7 pages in a Microsoft Word document and should include the following information:

  • A detailed description of the aggregate
  • A description of the aggregate's strengths and weaknesses
  • A risk assessment of the aggregate
  • Diagnoses based on the risk assessment
  • A detailed care plan for the aggregate
  • A description of how at least one intervention was implemented in the aggregate to address an identified issue
  • An evaluation of how you would identify the effectiveness of the intervention

The Power Point presentation should be concise and should include the highlights of the Capstone project and the key things learned over the course of this project, from developing, implementing, and evaluating the care plan. Your presentation should not exceed 15 slides.

Submit your final Microsoft Word document containing the evaluation and complete summary to the W10 Assignment 2 Dropbox by Sunday, March 11, 1900. Use bold sub-headings in the paper to differentiate between the evaluation and the summary information. Submit your activities log to Doc Sharing.

Phase 7 and 8: Final Submission


Rubric Name: NSG4075 Week 10 Project Rubric

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment.

Lack of evaluation of the implementation plan.

Evaluation does not address all interventions.

Evaluation of implementation does not discuss effectiveness.

Evaluation addresses all interventions and effectiveness.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment.

Lack of a discussion about implementation.

Included a vague discussion of the implementation.

Provided description of the plan for the implementation of interventions.

Thoroughly described the plan for implementation of interventions and anticipated signs of success.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment.

Cited one source and it was not a journal article.

Cited two sources but they were not journal articles.

Cited one source that was a journal article.

Cited two journal articles.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment.

No documentation submitted.

Submitted an incomplete documentation.

Submitted a complete documentation.

Submitted a complete and clear documentation.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment.

No presentation submitted.

Submitted an incomplete presentation.

Submitted a complete presentation.

Submitted a complete and clear presentation.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment.

No key learning provided.

Provided at least one key learning, clearly related to the project.

Provided more than one key learning but not all are clearly related to the project.

Provided more than one key learning and all are clearly related to the project.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment.

Introduction is limited or missing entirely.

The paper lacks a thesis statement.

Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.

Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.

Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.

The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred.

Transitions are sporadic.

Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped.

Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic.

The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement.

Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.

Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.

Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background info, and clearly states the topic.

The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis.

Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas relate.

Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment.

Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension.

Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension.

Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension.

The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic.

Criteria

Student did not submit assignment.

No attempt at APA format.

APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant.

Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor.

Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present.

Overall Score

Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Studypool Tutor
School: Boston College
Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students
flag Report DMCA
Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors