explain in a short paragraph why you think scientific evidence provided by Patterson or by researchers examining the effects of second-hand cigarette smoke was countered so strongly by the big petroleum and tobacco companies. How do you think the "big money" provided by these industries to fund alternate research efforts reflects the importance of the role of funding in research? Answer needs to include:Evidence Explains why scientific evidence provided by Patterson or by researchers examining the effects of second-hand cigarette smoke was countered so strongly by the big petroleum and tobacco companiesFunding Explains how the “big money” provided by these industries to fund alternate research efforts reflects the importance of the role of funding in researchCommunicates ClearlyClearly communicates key ideas and thoughts in a short-answer response

Read the attached case study (when basic value conflict). Then answer the following questions:What sort of criteria are appropriate to be used in making decisions between conflicting values (what W. D. Ross called "prima facie duties") when those values or duties are both of utmost importance to a community?If you had been in Dean Nason's place, what would you have done? If you had been in Kukich's place, what would you have done?Once a difficult decision has been made between conflicting values or duties, how does the community live with its decision? What should the school do now that the issues have been raised if the exhibit has been removed? How does the community move forward?Note: You are expected to make one original response answering the questions and reply to the posting of at least two other students.Each original response to the questions must be at least 80 words long and specifically reference some concept or content reference in the coursework for the week (attached).Peer responses must be at least 50 words long and one or more of these types: 1) agreement with extension, 2) an alternative perspective with rationale, or a 3) respectful challenge with counter argument.