Hi, the ppt was already finished, but it needed to be redone based on my professor's feedback. I titled it fpx_4060_assessment_4_old. I had a tutor do the ppt but I am not sure if they addressed all of my professor's feedback and some of the formatting needs fixing. This ppt is titled tutor_ppt. I need someone to check to see if the tutor_ppt addressed all of my professor's feedback and if not I need I need it revised. I noticed that there are also some formatting issues with the tutor ppt as well that need fixing so I am not sure if it is good or not.  I have attached the assignment instructions along with a rubric so that you know what the assignment was all about and how my professor grades. Please make sure that after you are finished revising the presentation is between 10-12 slides excluding the title and references slides plus 100-150 words of speaker notes per slide. Instructions: NURS 4060 ASSESSMENT 4. Please be sure to complete a 10-12 slide presentation excluding the title and reference slides plus 100-150 words of speaker notes per slide. Please be sure to include: At least one in-text citation for each slide and in the speaker notes. No plagiarism Scholarly sources published within the last five years, so between 2017-2021 At least one image per slide along with a background for each slide Requirements: 10-12 Slide Presentation excluding the title and reference slides + 100-150 words of speaker notes per slide Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Professor's FeedbacK: YOUR RESULT: NON-PERFORMANCE Non-Performance Does not evaluate educational session outcomes and the attainment of agreed-upon health goals in collaboration with hypothetical participants. FACULTY COMMENTS: In this section you need to define your specific measurable goals that you made in collaboration with your hypothetical participants. You would've done this in assessment one. Then assess the outcomes and and the attainment of the agreed-upon goals. And the final step is to clearly explain potential revisions to improve future sessions. I have attached the ppt along with the voice over that needs to be revised. Here is what the professor said just to show you all of it. OVERALL COMMENTS Thank you for your work on this assessment related to your health promotion on tobacco use. As a reminder this health promotion plan is a community-based plan. This is not implemented within the healthcare institution. You are representing yourself as a community health nurse trying to educate a specific hypothetical group of individuals in the hopes of making change in their behaviors based on the education you provided in your presentation. You need to define your hypothetical group, define your specific measurable goals you developed with your group. And then assess the healthy people 2030 objectives. Please see my comments below. If possible if you could highlight the changes you're making on your slides and in your notes in yellow. You can also specify what slide to make changes or additions to. Dr. Erwin RUBRICS CRITERIA 1 Present a health promotion plan to a hypothetical individual or a group within a community.COMPETENCYApply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead health promotion and improve population health. NON_PERFORMANCEDOES NOT PRESENT A HEALTH PROMOTION PLAN TO A HYPOTHETICAL INDIVIDUAL OR A GROUP WITHIN A COMMUNITY.BASICPRESENTS A HEALTH PROMOTION PLAN TO A HYPOTHETICAL INDIVIDUAL OR A GROUP WITH A COMMUNITY THAT LACKS CLEAR PURPOSE, COHERENCE, OR FOCUS, OR IS SUPPORTED BY SLIDES THAT ADD LITTLE VALUE TO THE PRESENTATION, EXHIBIT POOR DESIGN, ARE HARD TO READ, OR INCLUDE DISTRACTING SLIDE TRANSITIONS, ANIMATIONS, OR GRAPHICS.PROFICIENTPRESENTS A HEALTH PROMOTION PLAN TO A HYPOTHETICAL INDIVIDUAL OR A GROUP WITHIN A COMMUNITY. SLIDES ENHANCE KEY POINTS AND ADHERE TO VISUAL DESIGN BEST PRACTICES, BUT NO AUDIO AND/OR SPEAKER NOTES.DISTINGUISHEDPRESENTS A PROFESSIONAL, EVIDENCE-BASED, AND ENGAGING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION. THE PLAN IS BASED ON SPECIFIC, IDENTIFIED HEALTH NEEDS AND GOALS, AND IS WELL SUPPORTED BY ERROR-FREE SLIDES THAT ENHANCE KEY POINTS AND ADHERE TO VISUAL DESIGN BEST PRACTICES. THE AUDIO AND SPEAKER NOTES OF THE DETAILS OF THE EDUCATIONAL SESSION WERE CLEAR AND APPROPRIATE FOR THE HYPOTHETICAL AUDIENCE. COMMENTS: You have done an amazing job providing relevant evidence in support of your project. Your health promotion plan was difficult to follow because the slides were hard to read and had too many words. It was difficult for me to identify who your hypothetical audience was for this presentation. Once again you need to find your audience as a set of community members you were educating to make health changes. Then early on you need to identify your goals for your presentation. CRITERIA 2 Evaluate educational session outcomes and the attainment of agreed-upon health goals in collaboration with hypothetical participants.COMPETENCYIntegrate principles of social justice in community health interventions. NON_PERFORMANCEDOES NOT EVALUATE EDUCATIONAL SESSION OUTCOMES AND THE ATTAINMENT OF AGREED-UPON HEALTH GOALS IN COLLABORATION WITH HYPOTHETICAL PARTICIPANTS.BASICEVALUATES EDUCATIONAL SESSION OUTCOMES AND THE ATTAINMENT OF HEALTH GOALS WITHOUT COLLABORATING WITH HYPOTHETICAL PARTICIPANTS.PROFICIENTEVALUATES EDUCATIONAL SESSION OUTCOMES AND THE ATTAINMENT OF AGREED-UPON HEALTH GOALS IN COLLABORATION WITH HYPOTHETICAL PARTICIPANTS.DISTINGUISHEDEVALUATES EDUCATIONAL SESSION OUTCOMES AND THE ATTAINMENT OF AGREED-UPON HEALTH GOALS IN COLLABORATION WITH HYPOTHETICAL PARTICIPANTS. CLEARLY EXPLAINS THE NEED FOR REVISIONS TO FUTURE EDUCATIONAL SESSIONS. COMMENTS: In this section you need to define your specific measurable goals that you made in collaboration with your hypothetical participants. You would've done this in assessment one. Then assess the outcomes and and the attainment of the agreed-upon goals. And the final step is to clearly explain potential revisions to improve future sessions. CRITERIA 3 Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and leading health indicators.COMPETENCYEvaluate health policies, based on their ability to achieve desired outcomes. NON_PERFORMANCEDOES NOT EVALUATE EDUCATIONAL SESSION OUTCOMES IN TERMS OF PROGRESS MADE TOWARD HEALTHY PEOPLE 2030 OBJECTIVES AND LEADING HEALTH INDICATORS.BASICEVALUATES EDUCATIONAL SESSION OUTCOMES UNRELATED TO PROGRESS TOWARD HEALTHY PEOPLE 2030 OBJECTIVES AND LEADING HEALTH INDICATORS.PROFICIENTEVALUATES EDUCATIONAL SESSION OUTCOMES IN TERMS OF PROGRESS MADE TOWARD HEALTHY PEOPLE 2030 OBJECTIVES AND LEADING HEALTH INDICATORS.DISTINGUISHEDEVALUATES EDUCATIONAL SESSION OUTCOMES IN TERMS OF PROGRESS MADE TOWARD HEALTHY PEOPLE 2030 OBJECTIVES AND LEADING HEALTH INDICATORS. CLEARLY EXPLAINS THE NEED FOR REVISIONS TO BETTER ALIGN FUTURE SESSIONS WITH HEALTHY PEOPLE 2030 OBJECTIVES. COMMENTS: You have a good start by identifying the applicable healthy people 2030 objectives. The next step is to evaluate the educational sessions outcomes in terms of progress towards these objectives. And the final step is to explain the need for revisions to better align future sessions with healthy people 2030 objectives. CRITERIA 4 Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).COMPETENCYApply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead health promotion and improve population health. NON_PERFORMANCEDOES NOT ORGANIZE CONTENT WITH CLEAR PURPOSE/GOALS. POWER POINT SLIDES DO NOT SUPPORT MAIN POINTS, ASSERTIONS, ARGUMENTS, CONCLUSIONS, OR RECOMMENDATIONS. SOURCES ARE NOT RELEVANT AND/OR EVIDENCE-BASED (PUBLISHED WITHIN 5 YEARS).BASICORGANIZES CONTENT WITH CLEAR PURPOSE/GOALS. POWER POINT SLIDES DO NOT CONSISTENTLY SUPPORT MAIN POINTS, ASSERTIONS, ARGUMENTS, CONCLUSIONS, AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS WITH RELEVANT AND EVIDENCE-BASED SOURCES (PUBLISHED WITHIN 5 YEARS).PROFICIENTORGANIZES CONTENT WITH CLEAR PURPOSE/GOALS AND WITH RELEVANT AND EVIDENCE-BASED SOURCES (PUBLISHED WITHIN 5 YEARS).DISTINGUISHEDORGANIZES CONTENT WITH CLEAR PURPOSE/GOALS. POWER POINT SLIDES SUPPORT MAIN POINTS, ASSERTIONS, ARGUMENTS, CONCLUSIONS, OR RECOMMENDATIONS WITH RELEVANT AND EVIDENCE-BASED SOURCES (PUBLISHED WITHIN 5 YEARS). COMMENTS: You have a good start. I believe if you remove some of the information from your slides and make them more concise that will help. Also reviewing the rubric and covering the required elements only. And making sure that you specify your goals early on and make them specific and measurable. CRITERIA 5 Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed audio and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.COMPETENCYApply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead health promotion and improve population health. NON_PERFORMANCESLIDES ARE DIFFICULT TO READ WITH MULTIPLE EDITING ERRORS. NO AUDIO AND/OR SPEAKER NOTES PROVIDED.BASICSLIDES ARE EASY TO READ AND ERROR FREE. NO AUDIO OR AUDIO IS NOT CLEAR, DIFFICULT TO HEAR, OR NOT PROFESSIONALLY PRESENTED. SPEAKER NOTES ARE SUFFICIENT SUPPORT FOR THE SLIDES.PROFICIENTSLIDES ARE EASY TO READ AND ERROR FREE. DETAILED AUDIO AND SPEAKER NOTES ARE PROVIDED. AUDIO IS CLEAR, ORGANIZED, AND PROFESSIONALLY PRESENTED.DISTINGUISHEDSLIDES ARE EASY TO READ AND CLUTTER FREE. SLIDE BACKGROUND IS “VISUALLY” PLEASING WITH A CONTRASTING COLOR FOR THE TEXT AND MAY UTILIZE GRAPHICS. DETAILED AUDIO AND SPEAKER NOTES ARE PROVIDED. AUDIO IS CLEAR, ORGANIZED, AND PROFESSIONALLY PRESENTED.

Discussion: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy EvaluationIn the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making. A critical component of any policy design is evaluation of the results. How comfortable are you with the thought of becoming involved with such matters?Some nurses may be hesitant to get involved with policy evaluation. The preference may be to focus on the care and well-being of their patients; some nurses may feel ill-equipped to enter the realm of policy and political activities. However, as you have examined previously, who better to advocate for patients and effective programs and polices than nurses? Already patient advocates in interactions with doctors and leadership, why not with government and regulatory agencies?In this Discussion, you will reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation.To Prepare:In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making.Review the Resources and reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation.By Day 3 of Week 9Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that currently exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy review. Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may present and describe how you might overcome these challenges. Finally, recommend two strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these opportunities. Be specific and provide examples.