(Continuation of first essay)

User Generated

RA_fhpx_jevgre

Writing

Description

Hello,

I hope you can help. I have this other assignment that it's built up from the first one I worked on. I have uploaded the first essay and the requirements for this new one. Would you be able to build off the first essay?

BTW, You don't need to do any research for this essay. The most important thing is for you to have a substantive engagement with the primary text.

Thank you.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Introduction to Philosophy: Classics 2/13/2018 Socrates’ View of Death in the Apology Socrates, in the Apology, presents his argument about death. He stands before the court in defense for himself, having been accused of studying philosophy. Being put to death is the final conclusion of the jury, for his actions. In this paper, I will thoroughly analyze and concur with the three main premises Socrates give regarding death, thereby concluding that death is a blessing. He begins his argument with the first premise, stating that there is "good hope that death is a blessing, for it is one of two things" (Plato, Georges & Cooper, 40c). He claims that this is true by continuing to argue that with no perception of anything, death is nothing. He again continues to say that as it is said in religious belief, it is a transformation of the soul from one place to another. Socrates refers to the lessons of Athens that claim there is life after death for the soul, when he says, "As we are told" (Plato, Georges & Cooper, 40c). Believing this to be true, Socrates argues that death is either nothing or as it is said by many religion and belief that it is a relocation of the soul. It, therefore, makes sense that death can be a relocation of the soul, or just it means nothing.it creates a chance for only two option, which may make true premise (1). Continuing with his argument, Socrates state in his second premise that death is a great advantage if it is nothing. He uses an analogy of sleep, comparing them as nothingness, to make true assumptions. "If it is complete lack of perception, like a dreamless sleep, then death would be a great advantage" (Plato, Georges & Cooper, 40d). He claims that a great advantage is to a dreamless sleep since the day after that sleep is always better. Socrates says that death must be of a great advantage if it is like a dreamless sleep since great advantage is to a dreamless sleep. This comparison is used to persuade people to believe in his premise (2). The idea of a good sleep seems appealing to the audience and therefore proves to be true. Socrates does not stop there and continues to argue that in his third premise that if death is really the relocation of the soul, then it is of great advantage too. "If on the other hand, death is a change from here to another place, and what we are told is true and all who have died there, what greater blessing could there be, gentlemen of the jury?" (Plato, Georges & Cooper, 40e). he poses this question to the jury to add emphasis to his claim. He asks this kind of question because it involves the beliefs of the Athenians. Since the jury believes in the Athenians belief, have no option to agree to his claim. This can also be the reason Socrates think this claim can be true. Socrates continues to provide more evidence by describing the story of Hades and life after death, where one can, for the rest of his time, philosophize with the greatest thinkers. Socrates believes that death is of great advantage if this claim is proven to be true. Socrates, therefore, makes a conclusion that death is definitely a blessing. "I am willing to die many times if that is true" (Plato, Georges & Cooper, 41a). He continues to say that he is happy to join the company of Homer, Hesiod, Musaeus, and Orpheus. He continues to mention Telamon and Ajax to call unjust his conviction, and he too can compare with them, their judicial experience. Socrates thinks his claims are valid and sound. The arguments can be considered valid and sound since death can be nothing making a great blessing. However, his premise (3) could not be sound. Many religions have a different view of life after death thereby making this claim false. This statement can then be considered a bad argument. Work cited Plato, Georges M. Grube, and John M. Cooper. The Trial and Death of Socrates. Hackett, 2000. Topic: This essay is meant to build upon your first essay. In your first essay, you analyzed/presented Socrates' views on death or Socrates' view on the law. In this essay, you will respond to what Socrates says, and present your own reasons/arguments in that response. Select one of the following topics as the basis for your paper (note that you must choose the topic that corresponds to your first paper): 1. Death: Do you agree or disagree with Socrates' view of death in the Apology? You must respond both to his "fear argument" and to his “two possibilities” argument. a. If you agree with Socrates, then explain why you agree. You must also imagine how someone might object to your view, and then respond to those objections. b. If you disagree with Socrates, explain why, giving specific reasons and arguments. 2. The law: Do you agree or disagree with Socrates' view of the law in the Crito? That is, do you think that it is ever acceptable to break the law? You must respond specifically to the "four arguments” that he presents in the text. a. If you agree with Socrates—if you believe that it is never acceptable to break the law—then explain why you agree. You must also respond directly to MLK, explaining why King is mistaken in advocating for civil disobedience. b. If you disagree with Socrates, then explain why, giving specific reasons and arguments. When (or under what circumstances) do you think that law-breaking is acceptable? Be specific, and lay out what criteria you would use. Remember to respond directly to Socrates' four arguments.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

OUTLINE

1. INTRODUCTION
2. BODY
3. CONCLUSION
4. REFERENCE


Running Head: PHILOSOPHY

Philosophy
Name
Instructor
Institution
Course Title
Date

PHILOSOPHY

2

Socrates view on death
I agree with the statements brought forth with Socrates on issues with regards to passing
away, though it vividly comes from a religious point of view, his points are well articulated for a
layman’s understanding. The fear of death is among the reasons Socrates is making stern
statements with regards to the wisd...


Anonymous
Just what I was looking for! Super helpful.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags